Mycotretus deyrollei Crotch, 1876

Pecci-Maddalena, Italo Salvatore de Castro, Lopes-Andrade, Cristiano & Skelley, Paul, 2023, Catalogue of Mycotretus Lacordaire, 1842 (Coleoptera: Erotylidae: Tritomini): an annotated, illustrated and historical approach, European Journal of Taxonomy 876 (1), pp. 1-182 : 33

24. Mycotretus deyrollei Crotch, 1876

Mycotretus deyrollei Crotch, 1876: 451 . Type locality: “St Catharina ” [state of Santa Catarina , South Brazil].

Mycotretus discipennis Kuhnt, 1910: 240 . Type locality: “St. Catharina ” [state of Santa Catarina , South Brazil] syn. nov. ( Fig. 24A ).

Mycotretus discipennis conductus Kuhnt, 1910: 240 [as a variety]. Type locality: “St. Catharina (Colonia Hansa) ” [in the state of Santa Catarina , South Brazil] syn. nov. ( Fig. 24B ).

Mycotretus sexlineatus Kuhnt, 1910: 241 . Type locality: “ Brasilien ” [ Brazil] syn. nov. ( Fig. 25D ).

Mycotretus deyrollei – Gemminger & Harold 1876: 3692. — Kuhnt 1909: 75; 1911: 49. — Blackwelder 1945: 466. — Alvarenga 1994: 23. — Skelley 1998b: 17.

Mycotretus discipennis – Kuhnt 1911: 49. — Blackwelder 1945: 466. — Alvarenga 1994: 24.

Mycotretus discipennis conductus – Kuhnt 1911: 49. — Blackwelder 1945: 466. — Alvarenga 1994: 24.

Mycotretus sexlineatus – Kuhnt 1911: 53. — Blackwelder 1945: 467. — Guérin 1948: 20. — Alvarenga 1994: 35.

Primary type

Lectotype, here designated ( Fig. 6A )

BRAZIL • “TYPE [blue label, printed] \ TYPE [printed],Deyrollii, St. Cath.[handwritten] \ LECTOTYPE [printed], Mycotretus deyrollii Crotch, 1876 [red label, handwritten]”; UMZC.

Other specimens examined

BRAZIL • 2 ♀♀ (dissected); “ Porto Alegre [handwritten], R.G. do Sul. [printed], 10949 [handwritten] \ Coll. J. Guerin. S. Paulo. Brasil. [printed] 18197 [handwritten] \ Mycotretus discipennis Kuhnt [handwritten], J. Guerin. det. 19[printed]54[handwritten]”; MZSP • 1 ♀ (dissected); “ BRASIL, Timbó, Sta. Catarina, Dirings [front, printed] out 1958 [printed]”; MZSP • 1 ♂ (dissected); “ BRASIL, Timbó, Estº. Sta. Catar. Col.: DIRINGS [front, printed] out 1958 [printed]”; MZSP • 1 spec.; “ BRASIL, Timbó, Sta. Catarina, Dirings [front, printed] out 1958 [printed]”; MZSP • 1 ♂ (dissected); “ Rancho Queimado, SC, 8- 11 / X [handwritten] /19[printed]94[handwritten] L. Moura [handwritten] leg. [printed] \ Col. MCN 232961 [printed]”; MCNZ • 1 ♀ (dissected); “ Triunfo, RS ( Copersul ), 25/XI [handwritten]19[printed]94[handwritten], A. Franceschini [handwritten] \ Col. MCN 232960 [printed] \ M. sexlineatus [handwritten]”; MCNZ • 2 specs; “ Curitibá, Paraná [printed] 10942 [handwritten] \ Coll J. Guerin. S. Paulo. Brasil. [printed] 4180 [handwritten] \ Mycotretus sexlineatus Kuhnt. [handwritten] J. Guerin. det. 194[printed]5[handwritten]”; MCNZ .

Distribution

South Brazil.

Remarks

1) There was one unlabelled specimen close to the lectotype in the UMZC collection. However, we do not know whether it is a syntype. 2) The unique (and very small) difference between the lectotypes of M. discipennis and M. sexlineatus is the length of the elytral stripes, which is shorter in the former than in the latter. Similarly, the central elytral spot of the lectotype of M. deyrollei is shorter than that of M. discipennis conductus . Aside from colour variation, there is no other external morphological difference in the examined specimens and the morphological pattern of their male genitalia is the same.

Figures

Fig. 24. Kuhnt primary types (dorsal, labels). A–A’. Lectotype of Mycotretus discipennis Kuhnt, 1910. B–B’. Lectotype of M. discipennis conductus Kuhnt, 1910. C–C’. Lectotype of M. expressus Kuhnt, 1910. D–D’. Holotype of M. fascipennis Kuhnt, 1910. E–E’. Lectotype of M. graphoderus strigipennis Kuhnt, 1910. F–F’. Lectotype of M. graphoderus thoracicus Kuhnt, 1910. Scale bars: C–D = 1 mm; A–B, E–F = see Material and methods.

Fig. 25. Kuhnt primary types (dorsal, labels) cont. A–A’. Lectotype of Mycotretus interstitialis Kuhnt, 1910. B–B’. Holotype of Brachysphaenus (Iphiclus) nigromaculatus Kuhnt, 1909 [currently M. nigromaculatus (Kuhnt)]. C–C’. Holotype of M. quadristriolatus Kuhnt, 1910. D–D’. Lectotype of M. sexlineatus Kuhnt, 1910.E–E’. Holotype ofM. stillatus Kuhnt, 1910.F–F’. Holotype ofM. thoracicus Kuhnt, 1910. Scale bars: B, E–F = 1 mm; A, C–D = see Material and methods.

Fig. 6. Crotch primary types (dorsal, labels) cont. A–A’. Lectotype of Mycotretus deyrollei Crotch, 1876. B–B’. Lectotype of M. dimidiatus Crotch, 1876 [= M. seminiger Harold, 1876]. C–C’. Lectotype of M. egae Crotch, 1876. D–D’. Lectotype of M. episcaphoides Crotch, 1876. E–E’. Lectotype of M. fulviceps Crotch, 1876. F–F’. Lectotype of M. fulvilabris Crotch, 1876. Scale bars = 1 mm.