Mispila (s. str.) venosa auguralis Pascoe, 1878, 1864
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5352.2.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8D2CD481-8C0E-4E14-A8FE-5C5F43A81D28 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8431430 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B72087A5-6211-5B16-53C2-C4FE9B4AF8A9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mispila (s. str.) venosa auguralis Pascoe, 1878 |
status |
stat. nov. |
Mispila (s. str.) venosa auguralis Pascoe, 1878 View in CoL stat. rev.
( Figure 4 View FIGURE 4 )
Mispila auguralis Pascoe, 1878: 376 View in CoL .
Mispila (Mispila) auguralis: Aurivillius, 1922: 275 View in CoL .
Mispila (Mispila) venosa View in CoL m. auguralis: Breuning, 1961a: 281 View in CoL ; Breuning, 1963b: 486.
Mispila (Mispila) curvilinea View in CoL (partly): Yan et al., 2023: 3.
Type material examined. India (Andamans). Holotype, male ( Figure 4a–d View FIGURE 4 ): ‘Type [p, label circular, red framed]; Andaman [h, label oval, dark green]; Pascoe / Coll. / 93–60 [p]; Mispila . / auguralis / Typ. Pasc. [h]; Mispila / auguralis / Pasc. [h]; NHMUK 014596488’.
Non-type material examined. India (Andamans): 1 male: ‘Andaman / Islands [h]; Capt. / Wimberley [h]; 45514 [h]; Fry Coll. / 1905. 100. [p]; M. auguralis [h]; Mispila / auguralis [h]; NHMUK 014596466 [p]’; 1 female: ‘Andaman / Islands [h]; Capt. / Wimberley [h]; 45514 [h]; Fry Coll. 1905. 100. [p]’; 1 female: ‘ANDAMAN IS. [p]; 628 [p]; Mispila auguralis Pasc. [h] / det. Breuning [p]’; 1 female: ‘Andaman/ Islands [h]; Capt. / Wimberley [h]; Fry Coll. / 1905. 100. [p]’; 1 male: ‘Andaman Islands; Atkinson Coll. 92–3’.
Comments. Pascoe (1878) described this species and considered it to be distinguished from both M. venosa and M. curvilinea by the white curve at the base of the elytra. Breuning (1961a) took it as a morph of M. venosa , subsequently he (1963b) regarded it as a colour variant of M. venosa . Yan et al. (2023) followed Breuning’s decision. However, the white linear markings on the basal half of the elytra is less developed than in M. venosa in appearance, the first transverse curve is more irregular, incomplete, broken at the suture, and the short central longitudinal line of each elytron is shorter and does not meet backwards at the end of the second transverse line or is absent; and it is also isolated from M. venosa in distribution, occurring only in the Andaman Islands ( India), while M. venosa occurs in Sarawak of Malaysia, Batchian, Java and Celebes of Indonesia. In view of this, herein we propose M. auguralis as a geographic subspecies of M. venosa , i.e., Mispila (s. str.) venosa auguralis Pascoe, 1878 stat. rev..
NHMUK |
Natural History Museum, London |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Mispila (s. str.) venosa auguralis Pascoe, 1878
Xie, Guanglin, Barclay, Maxwell V. L. & Wang, Wenkai 2023 |
Mispila (Mispila) curvilinea
Yan, K. & Wu, M. - J. & Huang, G. - Q. 2023: 3 |
Mispila (Mispila) venosa
Breuning, S. 1963: 486 |
Breuning, S. 1961: 281 |
Mispila (Mispila) auguralis:
Aurivillius, C. 1922: 275 |
Mispila auguralis
Pascoe, F. P. 1878: 376 |