Neoperla (Formosita) bimaculata Li, Wang & Li 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5339.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1D26169A-DA6F-45EE-A186-C84CC78749B6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8297826 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B67C351F-FF89-2B38-63E7-FAD6FD978A0E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Neoperla (Formosita) bimaculata Li, Wang & Li 2021 |
status |
|
Neoperla (Formosita) bimaculata Li, Wang & Li 2021 View in CoL , presumed female
( Figs. 53–55 View FIGURES 50–56 )
Material studied: 2♀, India, Himachal Pradesh, Barog nr Solan [30.88°, 77.10°], 1550m, 17.7.92, leg. Julka & Bala (Zoological Survey of India). 1♀, Bhutan, Dorjee Khandu Dukpa , Kharbandi [26°50‘20‘‘, 89°23‘30‘‘], 700m (Mus. Basel) .
The GoogleMaps very characteristic pigmentation ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 50–56 ) makes me believe these are the unknown females of N. bimaculata which was named from Tibet (Motuo, Beibeng, 29°14’45.11’’ N, 95°10’16.21’’E). The species is apparently widespread in the Himalaya.
Female genitalia ( Fig. 55 View FIGURES 50–56 ) similar to N. fasciata but the vaginal extension is twice as long as the base of the vagina and is curved. It is uncertain if it contains a longitudinally folded sclerite, or a pair of closely appressed sclerites. The egg with triplets ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 50–56 )
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |