Sarimissus, Wang & Zhang & Bourgoin, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4706.2.10 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9B5D50B0-4A39-4351-9BE9-E816A1F4B5A2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B45787A8-122F-FF94-FF16-402FFCDBFE47 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sarimissus |
status |
gen. nov. |
Sarimissus View in CoL gen. nov.
Type species: Sarimissus maculifrons sp. nov., here designated.
Diagnosis. This new species appears similar to Eusarima Yang, 1994 , but differs by: 1) Frons with sublateral carinae invisible ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ) or only weakly present at apical part, but in Eusarima , the sublateral carinae elevated from apical area extend to near base ( Chan & Yang, 1994, fig. 45B); 2) ScP+RA on forewing relatively shorter, not reaching apical 1/3 of forewing ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ), while almost reaching apical 1/ 4 in Eusarima ( Chan & Yang, 1994, fig. 45C); 3) Phallic complex with only a pair of processes ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–11 ), while two pairs are present in Eusarima ( Chan & Yang, 1994, fig. 45H).
This new genus is also similar to the genus Dactylissus Gnezdilov & Bourgoin, 2014 , but differs by: 1) Vertex narrower, around 1.5 times wider than long in midline ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ), while around 2.0 times wider in Dactylissus ( Gnezdilov et al., 2014, fig.10); 2) Gonostylus trapezoidal in lateral view ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 7–11 ), but trianglular in Dactylissus ( Gnezdilov et al., 2014, fig.18); 3) Periandrium without basal processes and aedeagus with a pair of lateral processes derived from the apical 1/6 ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–11 ), but in Dactylissus , periandrium with several pairs of basal processes and aedeagus without lateral processes ( Gnezdilov et al., 2014, figs 15, 16).
Etymology. The name belongs to an arbitrary letter association between the names of “ Sarima ” and “ Issus ”, respectively type genus name of the tribe Sarimini and family Issidae , to which the new genus belongs to. The gen- der is masculine.
Description. Head with compound eyes a little wider than pronotum ( Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Vertex rectangular, around 1.5 times broader than long, margins elevated, anterior margin slightly angularly convex, posterior margin anteriorly angularly concave at middle, median carina absent on disc ( Figs 1, 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Frons almost the same width in widest part than length in midline, slightly broaden below level of compound eyes, the lateral angles rounded; margins elevated, dorsal margin slightly concave, median carina elevated from apex extending to near base but not reaching frontoclypeal suture ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ), sublateral carinae only weakly visible at apical part or invisible ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Frontoclypeal suture slightly convex ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Clypeus smooth, without median carina ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Rostrum reaching hind coxae, the apical segment nearly the same length as subapical segment. Gena in lateral view oblique with a small protuberance above the clypeus ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Antenna with scape extremely short, pedicel rounded ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Pronotum triangular, margins elevated, anterior margin angularly protruded, posterior margin nearly straight, median carina only present on the middle ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ) or invisible. Mesonotum a little longer than pronotum, anterior margin nearly straight, tricarinated on the disc ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Forewings obviously longer than broad, longitudinal veins elevated ( Figs 1, 2, 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ); costal area relatively broad, ScP+RA and RP fused with a short stem, ScP+RA median length, exceeding the middle of costal margin but not reaching apical 1/3 of forewing, RP extremely long, reaching to the outer margin of forewing ( Figs 2, 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ); MP forking only once near the middle into the forked MP1+2 and forked or unforked MP3+4 ( Figs 2, 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ); CuA forking slightly after MP ( Figs 2, 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ), CuA1 and CuA2 unforked ( Figs 2, 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Clavus closed, Pcu and A1 fused at middle of clavus ( Figs 1, 5 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Hind wings developed of Sarimini type with 3-lobes, Pcu-A1 lobe as wide as ScP-R- MP-Cu lobe, Pcu and A1 anastomosing on a long distance, Pcu unbranched, A2 lobe developed, a little wider than Pcu-A1 lobe, A2 vein non branched ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–6 ). Metatibia with two lateral spines on apical half.
Male genitalia. Anal tube in lateral view extremely long and narrow, surpassing the posterior margin of gonostyli, dorsal margin inclined downward from basal 1/6 ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–11 ). Pygofer in lateral view long rectangular, much lon- ger than broad, dorsal margin slightly sloping posterior, posterior margin convex near middle ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 7–11 ). Gonostylus trapezoidal in lateral view, dorsal margin regularly convex, posterior ventral lobe short with caudo-ventral angle nearly rectangular ( Figs 7, 9 View FIGURES 7–11 ). Capitulum of gonostylus short and broad, with an antero-lateral protuberance and a posterior protuberance near the base ( Figs 7, 9 View FIGURES 7–11 ). Periandrium symmetric, divided into dorsal lobes, lateral lobes and ventral lobe in the apex, dorsal and lateral lobes a little longer than ventral lobe in lateral view ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–11 ). Aedeagus with a pair of processes derived from the apical 1/6 ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 7–11 ).
Distribution. China (Hainan province).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.