Pseudocleobis mauryi Iuri, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5094.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:833983DE-9829-4813-A36F-A1EA2E1B4223 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6302447 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B400FD2E-FFB9-0917-FF10-28AFFD668A7F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pseudocleobis mauryi Iuri |
status |
sp. nov. |
Pseudocleobis mauryi Iuri , sp. nov.
( Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 ; 8A, B View FIGURE 8 ; 9E View FIGURE 9 ; 11C View FIGURE 11 ; 12G–I View FIGURE 12 . Table 1 View TABLE 1 )
Pseudocleobis huinca: Maury 1976 View in CoL misidentification (in part)
Type material: Holotype: ARGENTINA: Neuquén: ♂, “Area Natural Protegida Cuchillo Curá”, near Las Lajas , Neuquén, Argentina [38º36’43,28’’S 70º23’14,36’’W], 16–22.I.2012, H.A. Iuri coll., (MACN-Ar 38419) GoogleMaps ; Paratypes: ARGENTINA: Neuquén: 2 ♂, same data as holotype (MACN-Ar 38470, 38472) GoogleMaps .
Other examined material: ARGENTINA: Neuquén: 1♂, Bajada “El Marucho” [39º26’16,06’’S 70º09’58,60’’W], 8.XII.1965, S. Schajovskoy coll., (MACN-Ar 6872, recorded by Maury 1976 as P. huinca ) GoogleMaps .
Etymology: The species name is a patronym in honor to Dr. Emilio A. Maury, former director of the Aracnological Division of the Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, who was the most important taxonomist of the order in South America, and who has made the most significant contributions on this genus.
Diagnosis: Pseudocleobis mauryi sp. nov. resembles P. huinca , P. bardensis and P. profanus sp. nov. in the body coloration pattern (darker in P. mauryi ) and the general shape of the flagellum, but can be distinguished from them by the following characters: the ventral margin of fixed finger mucron is straight directed downwards and presents a tiny distal notch ( Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 , DN) that makes the FD, FSD and FM be placed in a more vertical line and more anteriorly directed ( Fig. 8A, B View FIGURE 8 ). The apex of the flagellum has a fringed retrolateral surface, with long filaments ( Fig. 9E View FIGURE 9 ). The margins at the apex are folded so that the ventral and dorsal margins almost touch each other. The attachment ring is slightly smaller and placed, at level between the FP and the PFM tooth. The movable finger mucron is strongly curved upwards and the apex is acuminate. The movable finger teeth are close to each other ( Figs. 8A, B View FIGURE 8 ). The difference of size between the MM and MP teeth is bigger than in any other species of Pseudocleobis .
Description: Male: measurements in Table 1 View TABLE 1 . Color: Similar pattern to P. huinca , P. bardensis and P. profanus sp. nov., but darker in general.
Morphology and Chaetotaxy: as described for P. profanus sp. nov., except by the following details: Fixed finger: the fixed finger mucron is robust but much shorter than the movable finger mucron ( Fig. 8A View FIGURE 8 ), and has a wide prolateral flagellar grove ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ). The proventral flange is straight directed downwards and curved at the base forming a tiny notch (DN in Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 ). The FD, FSD and FM teeth are strongly anteriorly directed, being placed almost in vertical line ( Fig. 8A, B View FIGURE 8 ). The FSD tooth is very reduced ( Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 ). Movable finger: the MP is the biggest tooth of the chelicera; the MM is smaller than the FM tooth. The movable finger mucron is long and strongly curved upwards. Flagellum: the flagellum has several long filaments on the retrolateral surface of the apex ( Figs. 9E View FIGURE 9 ). The apex is folded so that the ventral and dorsal margins almost touch each other. The attachment ring is at level between the FP and the PFM tooth ( Fig. 8B View FIGURE 8 ). Pedipalps: the pedipalps have a similar spiniform setae armature as P. huinca , P. bardensis and P. profanus sp. nov. but with the basal pair of the tibia and basitarsus more setiform. Additionally, the other spiniform setae of tibia and basitarsus are more robust (but not longer) and more equally-sized.
Opisthosoma: with several bifurcated tip setae of different sizes and some filiform ctenidia on sternite III and IV. The ctenidia are weaker than in P. huinca , P. bardensis and P. profanus sp. nov. and more difficult to distinguish at optic microscope. We observed 2-2 on sternite III and 4-4 on sternite IV.
Female: Unknown.
Variability: one studied male (MACN-Ar 6872) has an anomalous right chelicera with an additional row of two fondal teeth.
Distribution: records of P. mauryi sp. nov. are from the Austral Payunia district of the Patagonian biogeographic province ( Figs. 1C View FIGURE 1 ; 4 View FIGURE 4 ), at about 900 masl.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pseudocleobis mauryi Iuri
Iuri, Hernán A. & Iglesias, Mónica S. 2022 |
Pseudocleobis huinca
: Maury 1976 |