Pachybrachis subfasciatus (J. E. LeConte, 1824)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.332.4753 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B38CACFC-61D7-FF58-51B0-76525F8EBA65 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pachybrachis subfasciatus (J. E. LeConte, 1824) |
status |
|
Pachybrachis subfasciatus (J. E. LeConte, 1824) Habitus 15 View Habitus 15 ; Map 15 View Map 15
Cryptocephalus subfasciatus J. L. LeConte, 1824: 173.
Pachybrachys biguttatus Suffrian, 1852: 167.
Pachybrachys impurus Suffrian, 1852: 186.
Pachybrachys xanthias Suffrian, 1852: 199.
Pachybrachys impurus var. Pachybrachis umbrosus Fall, 1915: 379.
Recognition.
Color dark, pronotum with sides narrowly yellow; elytra with red or yellow, more or less broad, irregular or indented transverse median fascia often interrupted at suture, and with red or yellow apical spot ( Habitus 15 View Habitus 15 ); Disc of pronotum often, and head more rarely, variegated with reddish yellow; male size small: length 2.21 ± 0.09 mm, width 1.18 ± 0.06 mm.
Distribution.
Eastern species distributed from Kansas to Louisiana to Atlantic Coast in the United States ( Riley et al. 2003), restricted to the Carolinian Zone in southern Ontario in eastern Canada ( Map 15 View Map 15 ).
Material examined.
ONTARIO: Essex Co., Leamington, 6.VII.1931, G. S. Walley [1♀, CNC]; same data, except 9.VI.1937 [1♀, CNC]; Hastings Co., 19.VII.1938, J. F. Brimley [2♀, CNC]; Lennox & Addington Co., 16.VII.1938, J. F. Brimley [1♂, CNC]; Norfolk Co., Normandale, 5.VI.1931, W. J. Brown [1♀, CNC]; Walsingham, 3.VI.1944, W. J. Brown [3♀, CNC]; same data, except 11.VII.1956 [2♀, CNC]; Northumberland Co., Hamilton, 15.VII.1981, M. Sanborne [1♂, CNC]; Toronto Co., Toronto, 15.VI.1896 [3♀, LEM]; same data, except 30.V.1897, C. T. Hills [1♂ 1♀, LEM].
Host plants.
No records are available from the specimens examined. Downie and Arnett (1996) reported Pachybrachis subfasciatus from black walnut ( Juglans nigra L.) ( Juglandaceae ).
Comments.
Pachybrachis subfasciatus is another possible example of a species once living in the Carolinian Zone which may have been extirpated from the Canadian fauna. No specimens were collected in the last 55 years. If its association with black walnut is correct, this may explain its rarity, or even extinction, since Fox and Soper (1953) reported this tree occurring naturally only in rich woods in southernmost Ontario and considered recent trees above these limits to have been planted.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.