Synagelides leigongensis, Wang & Irfan & Peng, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.724.1153 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4D3CCD86-6CA9-42A6-BFFA-EABC6797C045 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4329858 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/67AE40F6-A67E-4CB2-ADA8-E107C10C8531 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:67AE40F6-A67E-4CB2-ADA8-E107C10C8531 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Synagelides leigongensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Synagelides leigongensis View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:67AE40F6-A67E-4CB2-ADA8-E107C10C8531
Differential diagnosis
Synagelides leigongensis sp. nov. can easily be distinguished from all other congeners by: 1) retrolateral tibial apophysis is bifurcated basally (not bifurcated, or bifurcated medially or apically in that of other congeners); 2) epigyne lacks median septum and has a large anterior arcuated rim covering almost half the epigynal length.
Etymology
The species name is derived from the type locality; adjective.
Material examined
Holotype
CHINA • ♂; Guizhou Province, Leishan County, Danjiang Township, Leigongshan National Nature Reserve ; 26 ° 22.15′ N, 108 ° 10.69′ E; ca 1290 m a.s.l.; 19 Jul. 2017; Cheng Wang et al. leg.; TRUSalticid-0012 .
GoogleMapsParatypes
CHINA • 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀; same collection data as for holotype; TRU-Salticid-0013 to 0015 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
Measurements. Total length 3.69. Carapace 1.70 long, 1.19 wide. Abdomen 2.03 long, 1.14 wide. Eye sizes and inter-distances: AME 0.37, ALE 0.19, PLE 0.18, AREW 1.19, PERW 1.22, EFL 0.95. Legs: I 4.76 (1.46, 2.39, 0.54, 0.37), II 3.05 (0.95, 1.10, 0.63, 0.37), III 3.20 (0.95, 1.05, 0.83, 0.37), IV 4.36 (1.22, 1.59, 1.07, 0.48). Carapace ( Fig. 6D View Fig ) stippled, yellow-brown, with a pair of irregular dark patches anteriorly. Fovea oval, hollowed. Chelicerae ( Fig. 6G View Fig ) yellow, with two promarginal teeth and one retromarginal tooth fissident. Endites, labium, and sternum ( Fig. 6E View Fig ) colored as chelicerae. Legs pale yellow to yellow except leg I interspersed with brown. Spination of leg I ( Fig. 6H View Fig ): femur v2-2-2; metatarsus v0-1-1. Abdomen ( Fig. 6 View Fig D–E) elongated; dorsum brown with lateral white patches anteromedially and two pairs of muscle depressions; venter grey-white, terminally brown, with brown dots. Palp ( Fig. 5 View Fig A–F): patella about 1.5 times longer than wide; retrolateral tibial apophysis bifurcated, the ventral ramus transparent and pointed apically, the dorsal ramus bent medially and blunt apically; cymbium with a discal dorsal apophysis; embolus flattened, strongly curved terminally and slightly pointed apically; median apophysis well-developed, sclerotized, terminally with little tubercles.
Female (allotype, TRU-Salticid-0014)
Total length 4.48. Carapace 1.59 long, 1.34 wide. Abdomen 2.41 long, 1.34 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.41, ALE 0.23, PLE 0.22, AREW 1.31, PERW 1.35, EFL 1.04. Legs: I 4.28 (1.30, 2.10, 0.51, 0.37), II 3.15 (0.98, 1.15, 0.63, 0.39), III 3.37 (0.98, 1.15, 0.83, 0.41), IV 4.57 (1.24, 1.73, 1.12, 0.48). Habitus ( Fig. 6F View Fig ) similar to that of male except paler. Epigyne ( Fig. 6 View Fig A–C) slightly longer than wide, with a large anterior arcuated rim; atrium large, almost occupying half the epigyne; copulatory openings located bilaterally; copulatory ducts short, terminally with short gland ducts; spermathecae inflated, boat-shaped; fertilization ducts extending transversely and slightly curved medially in dorsal view.
Distribution
China (Guizhou) ( Fig. 18 View Fig ).
Comments
The pairing of this species and the following ones are mainly based on the fact that both sexes were collected from the same sites and share similar markings. Moreover, the sexual dimorphism between the male and female of S. leigongensis sp. nov. is consistent with sexual dimorphism found in related species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |