Playfordiidae, Dzik, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13286059 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B3474D00-872D-A513-FCF7-3AAAFCFE1F93 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Playfordiidae |
status |
|
Family Playfordiidae nov.
Diagnosis.—Elements of the apparatus with very thin, finely denticulated blades and very wide basal cavity; little shape differentiation within the apparatus.
Remark.—Despite its originally suggested icriodontid affinities, the apparatus of Playfordia primitiva ( Bischoff and Ziegler, 1957) is basically different from those of the icriodontids in not showing distinction between the platform series and the symmetry transition series elements, as discussed above ( Fig. 15 View Fig ). Some remote similarities to the Early Carboniferous Eotaphrus can be traced, but there is too long time hiatus separating these genera. Symmetrical elements of Playfordia resemble superficially Ancyrognathus ancyrognathoideus ( Ziegler, 1958) (see Wang 1994: pl. 10: 1) but to make them homologous would require to assume that the basal cone of Playfordia is an extremely thin platform derived from that of Ancyrognathus . They also differ in surface ornamentation (see Figs. 15B View Fig and 28), which in the ancyrognathids, as well as in Dinodus , is covered with cell imprints and not finely tuberculated. Moreover, the stratigraphic occurrence of Playfordia makes it derivation from Ancyrognathus unlikely.
Genera included.—Only Playfordia Glenister and Klapper, 1966 .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.