Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius)
publication ID |
2360 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6287132 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B305E5D3-62BF-4CC1-BABB-ABF33630A842 |
treatment provided by |
Christiana |
scientific name |
Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius) |
status |
|
Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius) View in CoL HNS .
Formica harpax Fabricius HNS , 1804, Systema Piezatorum, p. 401, worker.
Pachycondyla montezumia, Pred. HNS Smith, 1858, Catalogue of the Hymenoptera of the British Museum, 6:108, worker, [[male]]. (New synonymy.)
Pachycondyla harpax var. dibullana HNS Forel, 1901, Revue Suisse de Zoologie, 9:347, worker. (New synonymy.)
Pachycondyla harpax var. irina Wheeler HNS , 1925, Arkiv fuer Zoologi, 17A (8):5, worker. (New synonymy.)
Pachycondyla harpax var. concinna Wheeler HNS , 1925, Ibid., p. 5, worker, [[queen]]. (New synonymy.)
I have examined many specimens of the P. harpax HNS complex, including those in the Wheeler collection placed as P. montezumia HNS , and types of P. h. irina HNS and P. h. concinna HNS . The northsouth variation which has been claimed by Forel and Wheeler as the basis for retention of P. montezumia HNS seems to me very difficult to demonstrate. I would call this situation at most a very weak cline. If I could pick a random series of this group from throughout the range and hide the labels, I feel sure that the percentage of determinations to the correct "race" by any competent entomologist would be little more than could be accounted for by chance. The bluish metallic reflections seen in many P. harpax HNS workers constitute a widely distributed phenomenon among dark ponerines which is greatly overworked as a taxonomic criterion. State of preservation of specimens, presence of oil or dirt, and other factors can affect this metallescence to such a degree that its value is highly doubtful. Under a bluewhite fluorescent lamp, it cannot be seen at all, even when clear under a yellow light. If P. harpax HNS can be broken down into categories correctly bearing the names synonymized above, there is presently no published proof of the fact that cannot easily be refuted by the proper survey of the series at hand in most large American and European museums. Additional collecting may change the interpretation here set forth, but if any of the names listed above are to be resurrected, it will have to be on a sounder basis than were the original definitions. The palps are segmented 4, 4.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |