VIVERRINAE Gray 1821
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2019v41a6 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:619EB4F8-90CD-4559-8B78-2BA79210F73B |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3704556 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B27C87E2-3542-FF8B-B17C-FF2FFD9E89DD |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
VIVERRINAE Gray 1821 |
status |
|
Subfamily VIVERRINAE Gray 1821 View in CoL View at ENA
VIVERRINAE gen. et sp. indet
MATERIAL EXAMINED. — KNM-FT 3373, right m1 .
DESCRIPTION
KNM-FT 3373 ( Fig. 4 View FIG J-L)
This m1 is smaller than the m1s of the preceding taxa. It has paraconid, protoconid, and metaconid that are subequal in height, with the paraconid being the largest in occlusal view and protoconid and metaconid nearly equal to each other. The three trigonid cusps are located close together and there is no central valley, only narrow notches between the cusps. The talonid is initially broad but tapers distally obliquely, such that the buccal side is straight and longer than the lingual side, resulting in the hypoconid being located somewhat distal to the entoconid. These two cusps are nearly equal in height, but the hypoconid is larger. There is no hypoconulid in evidence.
Measurements. Lm1 6.1; Wm1 3.5; Ltm1 3.6.
DISCUSSION
There is little to go on in the taxonomic identification of this tooth. Structurally it differs considerably from the two taxa discussed above. The closest similarity appears to be with Legetetia nandii (cf. Schmidt-Kittler [1987: figs 17d-f, 18eg]). Without suggesting specific phylogenetic affinity, the overall structure of the trigonid, as well as the asymmetric form of the talonid, are reminiscent of Genetta and the tooth is therefore tentatively placed in Viverrinae .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.