Andraegoidus Aurivillius, 1920

R, Juan Pablo Botero & Monné, Marcela L., 2012, Revision of the genus Andraegoidus Aurivillius (Insecta: Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), Zootaxa 3169 (1), pp. 1-60 : 5-14

Andraegoidus Aurivillius, 1920

Andraegoidus Aurivillius, 1920: 369 ; Hüdepohl, 1985: 39 (reval.); Monné, 1994: 86 (cat.); Monné & Giesbert, 1995: 142 (check); Monné, 2005: 581 (cat.); Monné & Bezark, 2010: 150 (check).

Type-species. Andraegoidus humeralis Aurivillius, 1920 (monotypy) [= Trachyderes cruentatus Dupont, 1838 ].

Head with fine, shallow punctures; two longitudinal carinae between the antennal tubercles. Antennal tubercles elevated and directed posteriorly. Frons short, transverse and depressed, deeper at sides. Sides of head, near outer margin of the lower ocular lobes, with oblique elevation. Eyes finely faceted; connection between upper and lower lobes with about three rows of ommatidia; lower ocular lobe subtriangular. Submentum with long and short, dense and whitish hairs, coarse and dense punctation. Genae projected, rounded, shorter than mandibles, with slightly coarse punctures. Mandibles with outer margin curved, adorned with longitudinal grooves, apices with short hairs, apices smooth and glabrous. Males with antennae filiform, 11 or 12– segmented; segments flattened dorso-ventrally, gradually narrowed to apex, smooth; females with antennae serrate, 11– segmented; segments gradually decreasing in length. Outer margin of segments IV–X and apical ¼ of segment III with longitudinal carina.

Prothorax wider than long, strongly swollen in males and with sexually dimorphic punctation. Sides of prothorax rounded and with two tubercles, one antemedian and the other postmedian, the first usually more evident in females. Disc of pronotum smooth ( Figs 1–2 ), with transverse carina interrupted by a median elevation; at each side of carina with an oblique elevation directed anteriorly; and with two elevations posterior to carina. Prosternum with transverse sulcus, median and deep; anterior margin with a median tubercle. Prosternum with intercoxal process subparallel, laterally with long, erect, whitish hairs; posterior region slightly projected and distinctly excavated below. Mesosternum depressed, with long whitish hairs. Mesepisternum, mesepimerum and metepisternum with dense, decumbent, whitish pubescence. Mesepimerum with elevated lateral margin. Metasternum with long whitish hairs, denser in lateral regions; metasternal suture almost reaching anterior margin and the latter with a slight depression. Metepisternum excavated anteriorly; narrowed apically, with a poorly developed glandular pore and without differentiated area.

Scutellum lanceolate. Elytra convex transversely, twice as long as broad and glabrous or with some microhairs restricted to apices. Humeri rounded, slightly projected anteriorly, with open depressions in anterior region.

Legs short, metalegs about ¼ longer than prolegs. Trochanters, ventrally with tuft of long, whitish hairs. Femora subclavate, not pedunculate, flattened laterally; meso- and metafemora with internal apex slightly projected; basal half of metafemora with rows of short and dense hairs. Tibiae subcylindrical, as long as femora, gradually expanded to apex. Tibiae with ventral surface pubescent, denser at apices. Tibial spurs divergent, outer spurs shorter than internal spurs. Tarsi short; metatarsomere I as long as II. Sternites I–V with fine and sparse punctures; sternites with long, short, sparse, whitish hairs, denser in lateral regions.

Male terminalia: tergite VIII ( Figs 47 , 77 , 107 , 140 , 173 , 203 ) subrectangular, apical third including margin with long hairs; ventral arc ( Figs 48 , 78 , 108 , 141 , 174 , 204 ) fork-shaped; dorsal arc ( Figs 49 , 79 , 109 , 142 , 175 , 205 ) reduced and membranous; tegmen ( Figs 50–52 , 80–82 , 110–112 , 143–145 , 176–178 , 206–208 ) with distal region divided into parameres; parameres with dense hairs apically; median lobe ( Figs 53–55 , 83–85 , 113–115 , 146–148 , 179–181 , 209–211 ) slightly curved in lateral view.

Female terminalia: tergite VIII ( Figs 56 , 86 , 116 , 149 , 182 , 212 ) about twice as long as broad, divided into a central hemitergite and two lateral hemitergites overlapping the central hemitergie’s board apical margin with acicular, long and denser hairs; posterior region of sternite VIII ( Figs 43–44 , 72 , 102 , 135–136 , 168 , 198 ) formed by aciculate, conchoidal and petiolate setae, arranged in several rows. Ovipositor ( Figs 57–58 , 87–88 , 117–118 , 150– 151 , 183–184 , 213–214 ) with short, subcylindrical lateral lobes; apical styli cylindrical; vulva membranous, longitudinally plicate; apodemes at common oviduct base, straight.

Discussion. Aurivillius (1920) provided a detailed description of the genus Andraegoidus and Hüdepohl (1985) improved the original description. We support the characteristics listed for the genus by these authors, except two cited by Hüdepohl (op. cit.): segment III with coarse punctures and elytra gradually narrowed to the apex. We note that there is variation in the punctation of segment III, from fine to coarse, and the elytra in Andraegoidus richteri are subparallel in anterior ¾. Here we add new characteristics related mainly to the pilosity and punctation exhibited in the venter and terminalia.

Aurivillius (1920) considered the genus Aegoidus Buquet, 1838 similar to Andraegoidus , and distinguished Aegoidus by the presence of spines in the femora and the appearance of the prothorax, without explaining the differences between the two genera. We add that the pronotum of Aegoidus has five tubercles: two antemedian and three postmedian.

Hüdepohl (1985) considered Andraegoidus similar to Chydarteres Hüdepohl, 1985 ; Drychateres Hüdepohl, 1985 ; and Seabraellus Hüdepohl, 1985 . Chydarteres was distinguished by the presence of a tubercle in the anterior margin of the prosternal sulcus, which is strongly projected and curved towards the apex, while in Andraegoidus the tubercle is slightly projected and not curved. Drychateres was distinguished by possessing a sharp projection in the anterior region of the prosternal process, with a projected and curved tubercle in the anterior margin of the prosternal sulcus, while Andraegoidus lacks the sharp projection. Seabraellus was distinguished by the absence of the tubercle in the prosternal sulcus and by the sexually dimorphic punctation in males restricted to the prosternum, while Andraegoidus always has the tubercle in the prosternal sulcus and sexual punctation not restricted to the prosternum.

The tribe Trachyderini includes 132 Neotropical genera ( Monné & Bezark, 2010) and, despite the large number of genera and species, a subgroup of genera within the tribe have the following characteristics in common: antennae filiform and long in males; pronotum with elevations and depressions (never with five clear tubercles); prosternum with transverse sulcus; elytra as much as four times the length of the prothorax, without carinae and generally with shiny surface. The following genera share these characteristics: Andrachydes Hüdepohl, 1985 ; Andraegoidus ; Chydarteres ; Deretrachys Hüdepohl, 1985 ; Dicranoderes Dupont, 1836 ; Drychateres ; Martinsellus Hüdepohl, 1985 ; Monneellus Hüdepohl, 1985 ; Retrachydes Hüdepohl, 1985 ; Seabraellus ; and Trachyderes Dalman, 1817 .

Andraegoidus can be differentiated from the genera listed above by the following characters: upper eye lobes connected with the lower eye lobes; antennae of males without granules; prothorax, in males, with clear sexual punctation; pronotum with transverse carina elevated and interrupted by a median elevation; deep prosternal sulcus; anterior margin of prosternal sulcus with median tubercle not projected or curved at apex; elytra glabrous or with some microhairs restricted to apex; and femora not pedunculate.

In Andraegoidus , we studied the male and female terminalia of the following species: A. cruentatus ( Figs 43– 58 ), A. homoplatus ( Figs 72–88 ), A. rufipes ( Figs 198–214 ), A. fabricii ( Figs 168–184 ), A. richteri ( Figs 135–151 ) and A. variegatus ( Figs 102–118 ). Terminalia were compared within the species of the genus as well as with the type-species of other genera considered similar to Andraegoidus : Chydarteres bicolor (Voet, 1778) ( Figs 3–15 ), Drychateres bilineatus ( Olivier, 1795) ( Figs 16–27 ), and Seabraellus gracilis Hüdepohl, 1985 ( Figs 28–39 ). We also compared Trachyderes (Trachyderes) succinctus succinctus (Linnaeus, 1758) ( Fragoso et al., 1987, Fig. 2 ), considering that it is the type-species of the tribe type-genus. Although the terminalia of all species were not studied, many morphological structures were common among all species, which are included in the redescription of Andraegoidus below. Some characters which vary in other genera where not included since they may also vary within Andraegoidus . The variable characters not included are found in the male terminalia: sternite VIII ( Figs 46 , 76 , 106 , 139 , 172 , 202 ) with short sternal apophysis; ventral arc ( Figs 48 , 78 , 108 , 141 , 174 , 204 ) with short apophysis; dorsal arc ( Figs 49 , 79 , 109 , 142 , 175 , 205 ) adorned with short hairs; ventral lobe ( Figs 53–55 , 83–85 , 113– 115 , 146–148 , 179–181 , 209–211 ) longer than dorsal lobe.

It is interesting to note that in males of Chydarteres bicolor , sternite VIII ( Fig. 3 ) possess lateral projections which are also found in Ancylocera cardinalis ( Dalman, 1823) (Ancylocerina) ( Monné & Napp, 2000, Fig. 54 ).

The use of scanning electron microscope (SEM) to study the prothorax revealed new morphological characters. In the pronotum, we observed that the appearance of the indentations is similar to the previous work that studied the sexually dimorphic punctation in other groups of Cerambycidae (e.g., Noldt et al., 1995; Monné, 2005; Nearns & Ray, 2006; Ray et al., 2006). We also observed common characteristics among the species studied: surface of the prothorax alveolate, with deep and rounded indentations; indentations with number of pores variable; between the indentations are scattered points that may have a small seta which is generally curved at apex.

Based on characters of the male prothorax, mainly of the pronotum, Hüdepohl (1985) recognized three groups of species in Andraegoidus : the first group was characterized by the strongly swollen prothorax, its octagonal shape and by the pronotum mostly covered with sexually dimorphic punctation. This group was composed of (names used by Hüdepohl (op. cit. )): A. cruentatus , A. homoplatus homoplatus , A. homoplatus hassenteufeli and A. distinguendus . The second group was characterized by having the prothorax strongly swollen in the anterior region, postmedian tubercle strongly developed and posterior half of pronotum slightly punctate; this group was composed of: A. lacordairei lacordairei , A. lacordairei punctipennis and A. variegatus . Finally, a third group was characterized by the presence of robust lateral tubercles with the antemedian tubercles generally strongly developed; pronotum with sparse punctation, posterior region and postmedian elevations smooth; this group was composed of A. rufipes and its subspecies.

Since we did not find uniformity among the morphological characters, we do not recognize Hüdepohl’s species groups. In the first group, not all the studied specimens of Andraegoidus homoplatus showed the sexual punctation described by Hüdepohl (1985) and in some cases punctation similar to A. lacordairei ( Figs 89 , 192 ) was observed. In the second group, we observed variation in the proposed sexually dimorphic punctation. In the third group, the antemedian tubercle can be much reduced or absent in A. rufipes ( Figs 215–226 ); some specimens of A. fabricii have abundant sexually dimorphic punctation ( Figs 157–163 ) and in A. richteri most specimens examined have punctures in the postmedian elevations ( Figs 152–156 ).

The presence and distribution of punctures on the elytral surface support the creation of two groups within Andraegoidus , especially considering that this character was constant in all the specimens studied for males and females. In the first group, species have elytra surface covered with dense and uniformly distributed punctation: A. cruentatus , A. homoplatus and A. laticollis . In the second group, species have the elytral surface smooth or with sparse punctures, concentrated mainly in the anterior region: A. distinguendus , A. fabricii , A. lacordairei , A. translucidus , A. variegatus , A. richteri and A. rufipes .

Key to the species of the genus Andraegoidus

Males.

1. Surface of elytra covered with dense and uniformly distributed punctuation........................................ 2

- Surface of elytra smooth or with sparse punctures, concentrated mainly in anterior region............................ 4

2 (1). Antennae exceeding elytral apices at least at segment X; prothorax with confluent sexually dimorphic punctation. Figs 59–65 . Brazil (RS), Paraguay, Argentina , Uruguay.......................................... A. cruentatus ( Dupont, 1838)

- Antennae exceeding elytral apices at segments VII or VIII; sexually dimorphic punctation not confluent................. 3

3 (2). Prothorax strongly swollen, without lateral tubercles; elytra black. Figs 66–67 . Colombia....... A. laticollis Tippman, 1953

- Prothorax not swollen, with at least one pair of lateral tubercles; elytra brown to black with red at base. Figs 89–91 . Brazil (MT, GO, DF, Paraíba to Minas Gerais, PR), Paraguay, Argentina , Uruguay............... A. homoplatus ( Dupont, 1838)

4 (1). Pronotum with dense, erect, long, whitish hairs; scutellum with long, sparse, whitish hairs. Figs 92–95 . Brazil (MG).................................................................................. A. distinguendus Hüdepohl, 1985

- Pronotum glabrous or with some sparse hairs; scutellum glabrous............................................... 5

5 (4). Antennae exceeding elytral apices at segment XI. Figs 96–97 . Bolivia............. A. translucidus Botero & Monné, 2011

- Antennae exceeding elytral apices at segments VIII or IX...................................................... 6

6 (5). Prosternal process with a distinct tubercle directed to anterior margin of prosternal sulcus ( Fig. 130 ), scape expanded from base. Figs 119–130 . Brazil (MT, MS, GO, PA, Ceará to Rio Grande do Sul), Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina , Uruguay................................................................................... A. variegatus ( Perty, 1832)

- Prosternal process without distinct tubercle, scape gradually expanded to apex..................................... 7

7 (6). Prothorax with coarse sexually dimorphic punctation; pronotum with antemedian tubercle always evident, postmedian elevations high and distinctly rounded at top; elytra subparallel at least in anterior ¾. Figs 152–156 . Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina ........................................................................ A. richteri ( Bruch, 1908) status nov.

- Prothorax with fine sexually dimorphic punctation; pronotum with antemedian tubercle evident or not, postmedian elevations different; elytra gradually narrowed to apex.................................................................8

8 (7). Prothorax enlarged anteriorly; pronotum with antemedian tubercle strongly developed (subequal to postmedian tubercle). Figs 157–163 . Brazil (MT, MS, GO, Maranhão to Bahia, SP )......................... A. fabricii ( Dupont, 1838) status nov.

- Prothorax narrowed anteriorly; pronotum with antemedian tubercle reduced and generally absent....................... 9

9 (8). Pronotum mostly covered with sexually dimorphic punctation and with postmedian tubercle slightly elevated and at right angle to body axis. Figs 185–193 . Venezuela, Brazil (PA), Trinidad and Tobago.................. A. lacordairei ( Dupont, 1838)

- Pronotum with sexually dimorphic punctation less extensive and with postmedian tubercle elevated and slightly directed posteriorly. Figs 215–226 . Brazil ( Bahia to Rio Grande do Sul), Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina ....... A. rufipes ( Fabricius, 1787)

Females.

1. Surface of elytra covered with dense and uniformly distributed punctuation....................................... 2

- Surface of elytra smooth or with some sparse punctures, concentrated mainly in anterior region........................ 3

2 (1). Surface of pronotum smooth or with some shallow punctures restricted to postmedian elevation of carina; elytra brown or brownish-orange with a black spot in the posterior half. Figs 59–65 . Brazil (RS), Paraguay, Argentina , Uruguay......................................................................................... A. cruentatus ( Dupont, 1838)

- Surface of pronotum rugose and/or with coarse punctures; elytra from black with a brown spot in basal 1/4 to light brown with four longitudinal lines clearer. Figs 89–91 . Brazil (MT, GO, DF, Paraíba to Minas Gerais, PR), Paraguay, Argentina , Uruguay............................................................................ A. homoplatus ( Dupont, 1838)

3 (1). Pronotum with dense, erect, long, whitish hairs; scutellum with long, sparse, whitish hairs. Figs 92–95 . Brazil (MG).................................................................................. A. distinguendus Hüdepohl, 1985

- Pronotum glabrous or with some sparse hairs; scutellum glabrous............................................... 4

4 (3). Prosternal process with a distinct tubercle directed to anterior margin of prosternal sulcus ( Fig. 130 ); sides of prothorax and prosternum with dense, long, erect, whitish hairs. Figs 119–130 . Brazil (MT, MS, GO, PA, Ceará to Rio Grande do Sul), Peru, Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina , Uruguay................................................ A. variegatus ( Perty, 1832)

- Prosternal process without anterior tubercle; prothorax without dense, long hairs................................... 5

5 (4). Sides of prosternum ( Fig. 156 ) with surface microsculptured and with dense wrinkles. Figs 152–156 . Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina ............................................................... A. richteri ( Bruch, 1908) status nov.

- Sides of prosternum smooth, at most with fine and sparse punctures.............................................. 6

6 (5). Pronotum swollen anteriorly, antemedian tubercle strongly developed (almost equal to postmedian). Figs 157–163 . Brazil (MT, MS, GO, Maranhão to Bahia, SP )...................................... A. fabricii ( Dupont, 1838) status nov.

- Pronotum narrowed anteriorly, antemedian tubercle reduced.................................................... 7

7 (6). Elytra subparallel at least in anterior ¾, elytral apices unarmed. Figs 185–193 . Venezuela, Brazil (PA), Trinidad and Tobago............................................................................... A. lacordairei ( Dupont, 1838)

- Elytra narrowed gradually to apex; elytral apices with or without spines. Figs 215–226 . Brazil ( Bahia to Rio Grande do Sul), Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina ....................................................... A. rufipes ( Fabricius, 1787)

Figures

FIGURES 1–2. 1. Andraegoidus rufipes, male; 2. Andraegoidus rufipes, female; ad= anterior depression; at= antemedian tubercle; dh= anterior depression of the humeri; me= median elevation; pd= posterior depression; pe= postmedian elevation; pt= postmedian tubercle; sp= sexual punctation.

FIGURES 46–55. Andraegoidus cruentatus male. 46, sternite VIII; 47, tergite VIII; 48, ventral arc; 49, dorsal arc; 50–52, tegmen: 50, dorsal view, 51, lateral view, 52, ventral view; 53–55, median lobe: 53, dorsal view, 54, lateral view, 55, ventral view.

FIGURES 76–85. Andraegoidus homoplatus male. 76, sternite VIII; 77, tergite VIII; 78, ventral arc; 79, dorsal arc; 80–82, tegmen: 80, dorsal view, 81, lateral view, 82, ventral view; 83–85, median lobe: 83, dorsal view, 84, lateral view, 85, ventral view.

FIGURES 106–115. Andraegoidus variegatus male. 106, sternite VIII; 107, tergite VIII; 108, ventral arc; 109, dorsal arc; 110– 112, tegmen: 110, dorsal view, 111, lateral view, 112, ventral view; 113–115, median lobe: 113, dorsal view, 114, lateral view, 115, ventral view.

FIGURES 139–148. Andraegoidus richteri male. 139, sternite VIII; 140, tergite VIII; 141, ventral arc; 142, dorsal arc; 143– 145, tegmen: 143, dorsal view, 144, lateral view, 145, ventral view; 146–148, median lobe: 146, dorsal view, 147, lateral view, 148, ventral view.

FIGURES 172–181. Andraegoidus fabricii male. 172, sternite VIII; 173, tergite VIII; 174, ventral arc; 175, dorsal arc; 176– 178, tegmen: 176, dorsal view, 177, lateral view, 178, ventral view; 179–181, median lobe: 179, dorsal view, 180, lateral view, 181, ventral view.

FIGURES 202–211. Andraegoidus rufipes male. 202, sternite VIII; 203, tergite VIII; 204, ventral arc; 205, dorsal arc; 206– 208, tegmen: 206, dorsal view, 207, lateral view, 208, ventral view; 209–211, median lobe: 209, dorsal view, 210, lateral view, 211, ventral view.

FIGURES 56–58. Andraegoidus cruentatus female. 56, tergite VIII; 57–58, ovipositor: 57, dorsal view, 58, ventral view.

FIGURES 86–88. Andraegoidus homoplatus female. 86, tergite VIII; 87–88, ovipositor: 87, dorsal view, 88, ventral view.

FIGURES 116–118. Andraegoidus variegatus female. 116, tergite VIII; 117–118, ovipositor: 117, dorsal view, 118, ventral view.

FIGURES 149–151. Andraegoidus richteri female. 149, tergite VIII; 150–151, ovipositor: 150, dorsal view, 151, ventral view.

FIGURES 182–184. Andraegoidus fabricii female. 182, tergite VIII; 183–184, ovipositor: 183, dorsal view, 184, ventral view.

FIGURES 212–214. Andraegoidus rufipes female. 212, tergite VIII; 213–214, ovipositor: 213, dorsal view, 214, ventral view.

FIGURES 40–45. Andraegoidus cruentatus. 40–42, pronotum, male: 40, general view; 41–42, detail of microsculptured surface and of indentations of the sexual punctation; 43–45, sternite VIII, female: 43, general view; 44, detail of brush of setae; 45, detail of conchoidal and petiolate setae.

FIGURES 68–75. Andraegoidus homoplatus. 68–71, pronotum, male: 68, general view; 69, detail of microsculptured surface; 70, detail of sexual punctation; 71, detail of a point with setae; 72–75, sternite VIII, female; 72, general view; 73, detail of aciculate and conchoidal setae; 74, detail of conchoidal setae; 75, detail of petiolate setae.

FIGURES 98–105. Andraegoidus variegatus. 98–101, pronotum, male: 98, detail of disc; 99–100, detail of microsculptured surface and of indentations of the sexual punctation; 101, detail of a point with setae; 102–105, sternite VIII, female: 102, general view; 103, detail of aciculate setae; 104, detail of conchoidal setae; 105, detail of petiolate setae.

FIGURES 131–138. Andraegoidus richteri. 131–134 pronotum, male: 131, general view; 132, detail of sexual punctation; 133, detail of indentation with pores; 134, detail of a point with setae; 135–138, sternite VIII, female: 135, general view; 136, detail of brush of setae; 137, detail of conchoidal setae; 138, detail of petiolate setae.

FIGURES 164–171. Andraegoidus fabricii. 164–167, pronotum, male: 164, general view; 165, detail of sexual punctation; 166, detail of indentation with pores; 167, detail of a point with setae; 168–171, sternite VIII, female: 168, general view; 169, detail of aciculate setae; 170, detail of conchoidal setae; 171, detail of petiolate setae.

FIGURES 194–201. Andraegoidus rufipes. 194–197, pronotum, male: 194, general view; 195, detail of sexual punctation; 196, detail of indentation with pores; 197, detail of a point with setae; 198–201, sternite VIII, female: 198, general view; 199, detail of brush of setae; 200, detail of conchoidal setae; 201, detail of petiolate setae.

FIGURES 3–12. Chydarteres bicolor male. 3, sternite VIII; 4, tergite VIII; 5, ventral arc; 6, dorsal arc; 7–9, tegmen: 7, dorsal view, 8, lateral view, 9, ventral view; 10–12, median lobe: 10, dorsal view, 11, lateral view, 12, ventral view. dl= dorsal lobe; is= internal sac; rp= ring piece; sa= sternal apophysis; vl= ventral lobe.

FIGURES 13–15. Chydarteres bicolor female. 13, tergite VIII; 14–15, ovipositor: 14, dorsal view, 15, ventral view. ap= apodeme; ll= lateral lobe; st= styli; vu= vulva.

FIGURES 16–24. Drychateres bilineatus male. 16, tergite VIII; 17, ventral arc; 18, dorsal arc; 19–21, tegmen: 19, dorsal view, 20, lateral view, 21, ventral view; 22–24, median lobe: 22, dorsal view, 23, lateral view, 24, ventral view.

FIGURES 25–27. Drychateres bilineatus female. 25, tergite VIII; 26–27, ovipositor: 26, dorsal view, 27, ventral view.

FIGURES 28–36. Seabraellus gracilis male. 28, tergite VIII; 29, ventral arc; 30, dorsal arc; 31–33, tegmen: 31, dorsal view, 32, lateral view, 33, ventral view; 34–36, median lobe: 34, dorsal view, 35, lateral view, 36, ventral view.

FIGURES 37–39. Seabraellus gracilis female. 37, tergite VIII; 38–39, ovipositor: 38, dorsal view, 39, ventral view. sg= spermathecal gland; sp= spermatheca.

FIGURES 89–97. 89, Andraegoidus homoplatus, lectotype, male; 90, Andraegoidus homoplatus, male (holotype of A. hassenteufeli); 91, Andraegoidus homoplatus, female; 92–93, Andraegoidus distinguendus, holotype, male; 94–95, Andraegoidus distinguendus, paratype, female; 96–97, Andraegoidus translucidus, holotype, male.

FIGURES 185–193. Andraegoidus lacordairei. 185, lectotype, female; 186, holotype of Andraegoidus lacordairei punctipennis, male; 187, lectotype of Trachyderes globicollis, male; 188, lectotype of Trachyderes impuctipennis, female; 189, lectotype of Trachyderes simplicipennis, male; 190, lectotype of Trachyderes nigripes, female; 191, lectotype of Trachyderes testaceus, female; Andraegoidus lacordairei, 192, male, 193, female.

FIGURES 215–226. Andraegoidus rufipes. 215, lectotype of Trachyderes ebeninus, male; 216, lectotype of Trachyderes rufipes var. axillaris, male; 217, lectotype of Trachyderes rufipes var. brunnipennis, male; 218, lectotype of Trachyderes boisduvalii, male; 219, lectotype of Trachyderes equestris, female; 220–226, Andraegoidus rufipes, male.

FIGURES 152–163. 152, Andraegoidus richteri, paratype, female; 153–154, Andraegoidus richteri, male; 155, Andraegoidus richteri, female; 156, detail of head and thorax, lateral view, female; 157, Andraegoidus fabricii, neotype, male; 158–161, Andraegoidus fabricii, male; 162–163, Andraegoidus fabricii, female.

FIGURES 59–67. 59–60, Andraegoidus cruentatus, lectotype, male; 61, Andraegoidus cruentatus, male; 62–63, Andraegoidus cruentatus, female (lectotype of Trachyderes cardinalis); 64–65, Andraegoidus cruentatus, female; 66–67, Andraegoidus laticollis, holotype, male.

FIGURES 119–130. Andraegoidus variegatus. 119, neotype, male; 120, lectotype of Trachyderes audouinii, female; 121, lectotype of Trachyderes gloriosus, male; 122–125, Andraegoidus variegatus, male; 126–129, Andraegoidus variegatus, female; 130, detail of head and thorax, lateral view, male.