Sennius bondari (Pic, 1929)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3736.5.5 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:961BBB7C-5E41-43B5-939A-F0327ED3D879 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6148086 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B22687F3-EC77-FF84-FF5F-FC5FFC6C4991 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Sennius bondari (Pic, 1929) |
status |
|
( Figs 9–12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 )
Bruchus bondari Pic, 1929: 28 . (original description, distribution); Bondar 1937: 40 (redescription, host, distribution); Zacher 1952: 461 (host).
Acanthoscelides bondari: Blackwelder 1946: 759 (catalog, distribution); Costa Lima 1955: 245 (host); Silva et al. 1968: 372 (host, distribution).
Sennius bondari: Johnson & Kingsolver 1973: 72 (citation); Johnson 1984: 62 (host, distribution); Udayagiri & Wadhi 1989: 100 (catalog, distribution, host); Kingsolver & Silva 1991: 412 (citation); Macêdo et al. 1992: 331, 334 (host, distribution); Pimentel 1997 (biology, host); Ribeiro-Costa & Reynaud 1998: 245 (catalog, distribution, host); Ribeiro- Costa 1998: 66 (biology); Silva et al. 2003: 269 (citation); Linzmeier et. al. 2004: 351 (biology); Caron et al. 2004: 4 (egg description); Koller & Nunes 2006: 6 (host); Pikart et. al. 2011: 378, 379 (distribution, host); Viana & Ribeiro-Costa 2013 (redescription, distribution, type, host, figures).
Redescription. Dimension. BL: 1.96–2.60 mm; BW: 1.28–1.64 mm.
Body black. Elytra with dense white setae on 1st strial interval, in small patch at base of 3rd and 5th interstices, forming rounded patch occupying 2nd strial interval at its narrowest section until 4th strial interval on their broadest part on median region; small, shorter and horizontal strip on submedian region, which occupies part of 5th to 9th interstices, sometimes dense patch in 7th and/or 9th interstices ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). Pygidium with intermixed sparse white and golden setae; patch of dense white setae on median-basal region and moderately dense on latero-anterior corners ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). Median lobe of male genitalia with long, moderately curved and broad hinge sclerites; apical region without spicules; subapical region with long and short spicules denser in two irregular groups; submedian region with groups of spicules at apex of latero-basal lobes; latero-basal lobes of internal sac with spicules denser at apex; basal region with denticles denser near gonopore ( Fig. 11 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ). Tegmen with lateral lobes separated by emargination about 0.7 times their length ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9 – 12 ).
Material examined and detailed diagnosis. See Viana & Ribeiro-Costa (2013).
Distribution. COL (Valle del Cauca), VEN (Carabobo), BOL (Santa Cruz), BRA (Rio Grande do Norte, Piau, Bahia, Distrito Federal, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais, São Paulo, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Paran).
Host plant. BIGNONIACEAE: Memora peregrina (Miers) Sandwith. FABACEAE : Caesalpinioideae : Senna pistaciifolia (Kunth) Irwin & Barneby, S. pendula (Willd.) Irwin & Barneby, S. occidentalis , S. bicapsularis (Linn.)
Roxb, S. macranthera (Collad.) Irwin & Barneby, S. bauhinioides (Gray) Irwin & Barneby, S. multijuga (Rich.) Irwin & Barneby, S. surattensis (Burm.f.) Irwin & Barneby, S. splendida (Vogel) Irwin & Barneby, S. alata (Linn.) Roxb., S. neglecta var. oligophylla (Benth.) H.S.Irwin & Barneby, S. neglecta var. neglecta (Vogel) H.S.Irwin & Barneby, S. appendiculata (Vogel) Wiersema (syn for S. australis), Senna spectabilis (DC) Irwin & Barneby.
Diagnosis. Sennius bondari (subgroup 3) is externally similar to S. leucostauros and S. lojaensis by sharing horizontal strip of white setae on elytra, but the male genitalia pattern place this species in subgroup 3, along with S. leucostauros . Sennius bondari differs from S. leucostauros and S. lojaensis by the shape of the horizontal strip on elytra, the white setae pattern in pygidium and characters in male genitália.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |