Funicristata
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5070/P940454153 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:58312615-0833-432E-BF5D-3DFFBF361AAA |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11488350 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/FD6D940A-FAFF-4FFE-9E35-042B7EBC2315 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:FD6D940A-FAFF-4FFE-9E35-042B7EBC2315 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Funicristata |
status |
N. |
FUNICRISTATA NEVADAENSIS N. GEN, N. SP. BURROW, 2023
( FIG. 5 View Figure 5 ; TABLE 1 View Table 1 ; SUPPL. 1, FIGS. 2 View Figure 2 , 5–7 View Figure 5 View Figure 6 View Figure 7 , 9 View Figure 9 –11, 14)
Zoobank LSID — urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:1BB5B9FC-3E9B-4F4B-B238-A25CA0E9A8D8
Diagnosis —Acanthodian with small scales up to 0.5 mm wide and 0.6 mm long; crown with strong branched ridges with a ‘twisted’ appearance leading back from anterior edge and converging towards posterior corner of crown, or at least extending past lateral corners of crown; neck low or absent anteriorly on most scales, with only small pore openings; base only slightly convex and deepest below anterior margin of crown; crown extends up to a base-length beyond posterior corner of base; four or five superposed crown growth zones with a thin enameloid top; wide-calibre canal extends from primordial crown growth zone to posterior corner of crown, its presence usually marked by longitudinal ridge on crown.
Holotype — Holotype scale UCR 10750-3 ( Fig. 5A–C View Figure 5 ); 456.5’ (= 139.1 m) level, BC II section, Roberts Mountains , Eureka county , central Nevada, U.S.A.: Roberts Mountains Formation (Late Silurian, Přidolí) .
Paratypes — Paratypes scales UCR 10750-2, UCR 10746-8, -10, thin sections UCR 10750-10, 12.
Referred specimens —Forty-three scales including the type specimens.
Occurrence —Only known from the type locality at levels 395–492.3’ (120.4–150.1 m).
Etymology — Nevada, for the U.S. state where the type material was found, and ensis, Latin suffix denoting place.
Description —Scales are small, up to 0.5 mm wide, 0.6 mm long and 0.3 mm high. Most scales appear dorsoventrally compressed, with a low or absent neck anteriorly on most scales ( Fig. 5A–E View Figure 5 ). The crowns have a distinctive ornament comprising branching ridges with a ‘twisted’ or rope-like appearance leading back from the anterior edge, extending towards the posterior corner of crown ( Fig. 5A–G View Figure 5 ), or at least extending past the lateral corners of the crown ( Fig. 5H, I View Figure 5 ). The crown extends up to a base-length beyond the posterior corner of the base, with most scales having a marked median ridge running back from the middle of the scale to the posterior tip ( Fig. 5A, E, I View Figure 5 ). In many scales, particularly the more ‘flattened’ examples, the crown ornament resembles a branching tree, with the posterior median ridge being the trunk with the radiating, branching ridges extending out towards the anterior edges. The neck has only small pore openings ( Fig. 5I View Figure 5 ). The base on all scales is only slightly convex and deepest below the anterior margin of the crown, with a marked rim between the base and neck.
Histological preservation is poor at these levels, with extensive hyphal borings, so that only general features can be discerned. The crown has four or five growth zones with all except the embryonic zone being extremely thin under the crown surface, comprising only enameloid posterior to the apex of the base ( Fig. 5J, L View Figure 5 ). A wide calibre canal runs from the embryonic zone up and back through the middle of the posterior crown, aligned with the median ridge on the crown surface, to the posterior corner ( Fig. 5J, K View Figure 5 ). Fine branching dentine tubules rise up in the anterior parts of the crown. No bone cell lacunae are detectable in the base.
Comparison —These scales differ from all known taxa, based on their distinctive crown ornament resembling a tree with successively branching ridges. The single large canal extending from the primordial zone back to the posterior corner could indicate that the taxon is a highly derived poracanthodid, but no poracanthodids resemble this species in morphology or position of pore canals.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.