Ficus amplocarpa

Mahima, Karthikeyan, Sudhakar, Jana Venkata & Ramalingam, Sathishkumar, 2020, Taxonomic delimitation of endemic Ficus amplocarpa and Ficus dalhousiae Complexes (Moraceae) by DNA barcoding, Phytotaxa 436 (1), pp. 21-35 : 22-23

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.436.1.2

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AD2F8432-FFF4-C43B-5DB2-F922407D1373

treatment provided by

Felipe (2024-10-01 21:18:12, last updated 2024-10-01 22:06:50)

scientific name

Ficus amplocarpa
status

 

Ficus amplocarpa View in CoL complex

Ficus amplocarpa View in CoL and F. guttata View in CoL are endemic species of Western Ghats of Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu belonging to subgenera Synoecia (Miq.) Miq. ( Corner, 1965) . They are almost identical to F. laevis View in CoL , distributed in Northeast, and Andaman & Nicobar Islands, however both are distinct in cauliflorus figs with short (up to 1 cm) peduncles. However, figs are axillary with long peduncles (1.5–4 cm) in F. laevis View in CoL . In F. amplocarpa View in CoL young shoots are glabrous or puberulous, leaves ovate to lanceolate, style of female flowers glabrous, figs without ooze of resin at maturity, where as in F. guttata View in CoL young shoots are dense pubescent, leaves cordate, densely to thinly tomentose, style of female flowers with tuft of apical hairs, figs with ooze of resin at maturity. Morphological differences of F. amplocarpa View in CoL and F. guttata View in CoL are described in Table 2. Corner (1960, 1965) reduced F. amplocarpa View in CoL (= F. macrocarpa Miq. View in CoL ) as a variety of F. laevis View in CoL ( F. laevis var. macrocarpa (Miq.) Corner View in CoL ) and also merged F. guttata View in CoL under this variety. Morphological and anatomical studies ( Sudhakar & Murthy, 2016) proved that these two species can be recognized as distinct and may not be treated under F. laevis View in CoL . But, most of the floras and online plant databases, i.e. the plant list, tropicos, ipni etc., still follow Corner’s view.

Therefore, we attempted to prove the distinctness of these two complex species and to confirm the taxonomic status of F. anamalayana View in CoL , F. dalhousiae View in CoL , F. amplocarpa View in CoL , F. guttata View in CoL and F. laevis View in CoL at sub generic level using DNA barcoding technique.

Corner, E. J. H. (1960) Taxonomic notes on Ficus Linn., Asia and Australasia. I. Subgenera Urostigma (Gasp.) Miq. II. Subgenera Pharmacosycea Miq. III. Subgenera Ficus and section Ficus. IV. Subgenera Ficus section Sycidium Miq. Gardens' Bulletin of Singapore 17 (3): 368 - 485.

Corner, E. J. H. (1965) Check list of Ficus in Asia and Australasia with keys to Identification. Garden. Bulletin of Singapore 21: 1 - 186.

Sudhakar, J. V. & Murthy, G. V. S. (2016) Identity of Ficus amplocarpa and F. guttata (Moraceae), the two closely allied south Indian endemic species and their conservation status. Rheedea 26 (1): 69 - 73.

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Rosales

Family

Moraceae

Genus

Ficus