Paraconocrinus rhodanicus, Roux & Philippe, 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5052.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1EB14EF1-E205-4E37-85F9-DFD97BE93058 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5572121 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AD1B87AD-FFFB-CC64-FF25-03A8FE6DF879 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paraconocrinus rhodanicus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Paraconocrinus rhodanicus n. sp.
Fig. 12G–K View FIGURE 12 , 13 View FIGURE 13 , Table 8 View TABLE 8
Type material. 26 Co not figured ( MHNL 20062728) + 4 Co figured ( MHNL 20062727) .
Etymology. Reference to the Rhodanian basin.
Additional material. 1 AC, 1 Co from Vedène.
Diagnosis. As in description.
Type stratum. Late Burdigalian.
Type locality. Place du Palais des Papes in Avignon .
Description. 30 Co (quantitative characters given in Table 8 View TABLE 8 ) corresponding to a stalk length of 62.5 mm. Co from distal stalk with proximal facet having one or more projections ended by rhizoid insertion at one ( Fig. 12G View FIGURE 12 ) or both sides ( Fig. 12J–K View FIGURE 12 ) of fulcral ridge. Co from mesistele without rhizoid, more elongated (1<H/D<1.5) with oval (D/d <0.85) synarthries (Fig. 14I). Distally, Co with weaker H/D (tending to 0.7), narrower (D/d tending to 2.5) spindle-shaped synarthries ( Figs.12G, J View FIGURE 12 ) with more robust rhizoid socket ( Fig. 12J View FIGURE 12 ). Synarthrial facets of classical Conocrinus type (see Roux et al. 2019) with a deep 8-shaped ligament fossa; fulcral ridge of two segments with axis hollowed, regular crenularium reaching ~20 small Cr on each side and bordered by slightly depressed ligament areas ( Fig. 12H View FIGURE 12 ).
Worn material from Vedène presumedly belonging to P. rhodanicus n. sp. Oblong aboral cup, preserved H 6.9 mm, D maximum 4.0 mm, stalk insertion 1.98 mm. Co with H 2.70 mm, D 2.95 mm and d 2.10 mm.
Remarks. Paraconocrinus rhodanicus n. sp. is a small species with distal Co articulated by narrow synarthries of fulcral ridge bordered by slightly depressed areas as in most species of the genus Paraconocrinus ( Merle and Roux 2018; Roux et al. 2019). The Co figured from the Middle Miocene near Turin (see especially Albus 1931 and Manni 2005) differ in having a larger size and more massive shape. As previously usual, isolated Miocene rhizocrinid Co had been attributed to the most classically cited Eocene species: “ Conocrinus ” thorenti (d’Archiac 1846) or “ Conocrinus ” pyriformis (Münster in Goldfuss, 1826). “ Conocrinus ” seguenzai Meneghini, 1875, known only from aboral cups from the Miocene of Piedmont ( Noelli 1900; Manni 2005), is the only rhizocrinid species clearly identified, but the published figures are too imprecise to attribute it to one of the genera distinguished by Roux et al. (2019). Although very worn, the aboral cup from Vednes, which may belong to P. rhodanicus n. sp., differs markedly from “ Conocrinus ” seguenzai.
Occurrence in southeastern France. Avignon (Place du Palais des Papes), Les Angles?, Vedène?, Late Burdigalian, Early Langhian?
MHNL |
Musee Guimet d'Histoire Naturelle de Lyon |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |