Chlorotocus crassicornis (A. Costa, 1871)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13229438 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AA7E8793-FFA8-F641-6F80-F417FBE4FC0A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chlorotocus crassicornis |
status |
|
Chlorotocus crassicornis View in CoL ( Costa, 1871)
Pandalus crassicornis View in CoL Costa, 1871: 89, 90, pl. 2, fig. 2 [type locality: Gulf of Napoli ] .
Chlorotocus crassicornis View in CoL – Sivertsen & Holthuis, 1956: 39, figs. 28, 29, pl. 3, fig. 3; Crosnier & Forest, 1973: 184, figs. 58-60; Chace, 1985: 12, figs. 7, 8; Hayashi, 1986: 116, 117, 267, fig. 73; Liu & Zhong, 1994: 560; Takeda & Hanamura, 1994: 20.
Chlorotocus crassicornis var. andamanensis Alcock & Anderson, 1899: 284 View in CoL [type locality: Andaman Sea].
Chlorotocus gracilipes A. Milne Edwards, 1882: 14 View in CoL [type locality: Alboran Sea off Mediterranean coast of Morocco].
Material examined. – 3 females (cl 9.4-10.0 mm) ( IOCAS), CN L43 B-4, 18 30’N, 111 30’E, 182 m, sandy mud, AT, coll. X. Ma, 11 Apr.1959 GoogleMaps ; 1 female (cl 10.1 mm), 1 ovig. female (cl 11.4 mm) ( IOCAS), CN K30 B-33B, 20 00’N, 112 30’E, 99 m, sand, AT, coll. F. Sun, 18 Apr.1959 GoogleMaps ; 2 ovig. females (cl 10.3, 11.0 mm) ( IOCAS), CN L58 B-5B, 19 30’N, 112 00’E, 120 m, sand, AT, coll. Y. Wang, 20 Apr.1959 GoogleMaps ; 1 female (cl 9.7 mm), 1 ovig. female (cl 10.3 mm, 2 specimens (cl 6.6, 7.2, abdomens lost) ( IOCAS), CN K33 B-53, 19 30’N, 113 00’E, 180 m, muddy sand, AT, coll. F. Sun, 21 Apr.1959 GoogleMaps ; 1 ovig. female (cl 10.2 mm) ( IOCAS), CN K45 B-54, 20 30’N, 113 30’E, 89 m, muddy sand, AT, coll. F. Sun, 25 Apr.1959 GoogleMaps ; 1 female (cl 11.1 mm) ( IOCAS), CN K46B2-21 , 20 00’N, 113 30’E, 140 m, sand, AT, coll. F. Sun, 25 Apr.1959 GoogleMaps ; 2 females (cl 6.4, 11.4 mm) ( IOCAS), CN K55 B-19, 19 30’N, 112 30’E, 156 m, shells and sand, AT, coll. Y. Wang and F. Sun, 5 Jul.1959 GoogleMaps ; 2 specimens (damaged) ( IOCAS), CN SIII19 B-7, 21 30’N, 115 30’E, 115 m, sandy mud, AT, coll. W. Zhang, 14 Jul.1959 GoogleMaps ; 1 female (cl 9.3 mm), 2 ovig. females (cl 8.3-9.4 mm) ( IOCAS), 1 ovig. female ( ZRC), CN R39 A-5, 17 00’N, 109 30’E, 157 m, sandy mud, AT, coll. Z. Fan, 15 Jul.1959 GoogleMaps ; 2 ovig. females (cl 10.7, 10.8 mm) ( IOCAS), CN SIII28 B-43B, 21 45’N, 116 00’E, 103 m, sand, AT, coll. Weiquan Zhang, 15 Jul.1959 GoogleMaps ; 1 female (cl 11.9 mm) ( IOCAS), CN N90 B-14, 19 30’N, 111 30’E, 102 m, sand, AT, coll. H. Li, 19 Oct.1959 GoogleMaps ; 2 females (cl 10.2, 12.2 mm) ( IOCAS), CN K88-55 , 20 00’N, 113 00’E, 128 m, sand, AT, coll. Y. Wang, 20 Oct.1959 GoogleMaps ; 1 male (cl 10.8 mm) ( IOCAS), CN K102 B-60, 19 30’N, 112 00’E, 122 m depth, muddy sand, AT, coll. F. Xu, 28 Oct.1959 GoogleMaps ; 4 females (cl 7.3-10.6 mm), CN K84B2-24 , 20 00’N, 113 30’E, 180 m, muddy sand, AT, coll. J. Liu, 20 Nov.1959 GoogleMaps ; 1 ovig. female (cl 11.1 mm) ( IOCAS), CN K123 B-71, 19 30’N, 112 30’E, 174 m, sandy mud, AT, coll. S. Shen, 8 Feb.1960 GoogleMaps ; 14 females (cl 9.3-15.8 mm, aver. 12.0 mm), 2 ovig. females (cl 13.9, 21.1 mm) ( IOCAS) , 1 female ( ZRC), CN K122 B-39, 19 00’N, 112 30’E, 300 m, sand, AT, coll. S. Shen, 8 Feb.1960 GoogleMaps ; 3 specimens (damaged) ( IOCAS), CN N115 B-7, 18 30’N, 111 30’E, 220 m, muddy sand, AT, coll. J. Liu, 8 Feb.1960 GoogleMaps ; 1 female (cl 10 mm) ( IOCAS), CN K148 B-16B, 19 30’N, 112 00’E, 124 m depth, sandy mud, AT, coll. Z. Tang, 4 Apr.1960 GoogleMaps ; 2 ovig. females (cl 13.8, 16.2 mm) ( IOCAS), CN K150 B-27, 19 00’N, 112 30’E, 290 m, muddy sand, AT, coll. Tang, 6 Apr.1960 GoogleMaps ; 1 female (cl 10.7 mm) ( IOCAS), CN N172 B-22, 19 00’N, 111 30’E, 162 m, sandy mud, AT, coll. Wang, 7 Apr.1960 GoogleMaps ; 1 female (cl 9.3 mm) ( IOCAS), CN S219 B-2B, 21 30’N, 115 30’E, 115 m, muddy sand, AT, coll. J. Qu, 13 Apr.1960 GoogleMaps .
Distribution. – South and East China seas, Africa, Andaman Sea, Indonesia, Philippines, Korea Strait, eastern Atlantic and Mediterranean; at depths of 3- 597 m.
Remarks. – Crosnier & Forest (1973) discussed the uncertain composition of Chlorotocus . They recognized C. crassicornis and C. novaezealandiae ( Borradaile, 1916) are valid. They believed that the Japanese specimen doubtfully assigned to Chlorotorus [sic] incertus by Balss (1914) probably represents a distinct, otherwise undescribed species. Our specimens are identified as C. crassicornis following Chace (1985).
Crosnier & Forest (1973) determined by direct comparison that a proportionally shorter rostrum distinguishes C. novaezealandiae from C. crassicornis . However, we have found that the proportional length of the rostrum is considerably variable in our specimens without correlation with size or sex, and that it is not reliable in distinguishing the two taxa. A thorough revision is needed to clarify the identities of these two taxa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Chlorotocus crassicornis
Li, Xinzheng & Komai, Tomoyuki 2003 |
Chlorotocus gracilipes A. Milne Edwards, 1882: 14
Milne Edwards, A 1882: 14 |
Pandalus crassicornis
Costa, A 1871: 89 |