Telema circularis, Tong & Li, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5403268 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AA26A802-FFF7-106A-F6CF-09F71EA9C22B |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Telema circularis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Telema circularis View in CoL n. sp.
( Figs 1A View FIG ; 2 View FIG )
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype: China, Guizhou Province, Guanling Bouyeizu Miaozu Autonomic County, Shangguan Town (25°48’N, 105°40’E), Gan-Zhi-Shu- Dong Cave , 8.V.2005, leg. Y. F. Tong & Y. C. Lin, ♂ ( MNHN) GoogleMaps
Paratypes: same data as holotype, 2 ♂♂, 16 ♀♀ ( IZCAS) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ ( MNHN) GoogleMaps .
ETYMOLOGY. — The specific name is from Latin circularis , round, and refers to the nearly round carapace.
DIAGNOSIS. — The new species is similar to T. dongbei Wang & Ran, 1998 , but can be distinguished by the distinctive straight embolus of males (the angle of embolus to the bulb is smaller than 90° in T. dongbei ), the different shapes of spermathecae of females (the spermatheca with distal end spiral in T. dongbei , but straight in the new species), the relatively distinctive promarginal teeth of fang furrow, the nearly rounded carapace and the relatively smaller body size.
DESCRIPTION
Male (n = 4)
Total length 1.33-1.36 (average: 1.34). Carapace 0.65-0.66 (average: 0.65) long, 0.59-0.61 (average: 0.60) wide; abdomen 0.64-0.70(average:0.68) long, 0.57-0.58(average:0.57) wide.Carapace,legs,sternum ( Fig. 2A View FIG ), labium, endites and chelicerae yellowish white. Carapace ( Fig. 1A View FIG ) nearly round, with a pair of setae on the clypeus, in the place of eyes and in the middle. No eyes. Promargin of fang furrow with one large tooth, one relatively small tooth and three barely visible granulous denticles, retromargin with four barely visible denticles ( Fig. 2H View FIG ). Legs with a dorsal spine at the distal end of patella as well as in the middle of tibia. Leg measurements:I 5.44 (1.61, 0.23,1.71, 1.16, 0.73); II 4.74(1.48, 0.24, 1.44, 0.94, 0.64); III 3.39 (1.11, 0.22, 0.92, 0.63, 0.51); IV 4.03 (1.36, 0.22, 1.17, 0.71,0.57).Leg formula:I-II-IV-III. Abdomen globular, gray; colulus as in Figure 2F View FIG . Palp with prolateral cymbial apophysis ( Fig. 2C View FIG ); bulb oval with one simple embolus ( Fig. 2B View FIG ).
Female (n = 18)
Total length 1.35-1.87 (average: 1.68). Carapace 0.61-0.82 (average: 0.75) long, 0.56-0.69 (average: 0.64) wide; abdomen 0.74-0.95 (average: 0.82) long, 0.72-0.88 (average: 0.79) wide. Eyes and chelicerae as in male. Leg measurements: I 5.50 (1.69, 0.25, 1.77, 1.12, 0.67); II 4.83 (1.52, 0.25, 1.54, 0.94, 0.58); III 3.55 (1.15, 0.23, 0.99, 0.69, 0.49); IV 4.43 (1.44, 0.24, 1.29, 0.90, 0.56). Leg formula: I-II-IV-III. Genital area with one row of hairs on epigynal plate, and another row behind epigastric furrow ( Fig.2G View FIG ). Spermatheca boot-shaped in lateral view ( Fig. 2D, E View FIG ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.