Arma velata, (Arma), 1868
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5232.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7B67882-2148-49C5-9F09-D5CAA95A21D1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10556094 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A948651B-FD3B-FFD5-D68E-FD91FCBD715B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Arma velata |
status |
|
velata (Arma) Walker 1868: 532.
Original data: “Hindostan. In the National Museum at Melbourne.” [syntype (s)]
Current status: Arma velata Walker, 1868 .
Notes: Walker (1868: 532) had separated Arma velata from Arma turbida thus: “Allied to A. turbida , but the spines of the thorax are longer and more acute.” Under the following heading “Species the types of which are not to be found in the British Museum.”, Distant (1900a: 64) placed Arma velata Walker, 1868 , declaring that it should be treated as non existent. Distant (1902: 256), however, noted: “This species, described from Hindostan, is in the National Museum at Melbourne.” Walker (1985) did not list Arma velata in his “List of Hemiptera sent to the Museum of Victoria by F. Walker”.
Atkinson (1888: 183) listed the species as of uncertain position, merely reproducing Walker’s (1868: 532) description. Distant (1902: 256) also listed the species as of uncertain position, noting further: “It is certainly described in the wrong genus, probably does not belong to the Asopinae , and is very possibly a synonym of some other species.”
If the type (s) were to be found in Melbourne, Distant’s (1900a: 64) remark should, obviously, not apply and Distant’s (1902: 256) conclusions could be proved.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Arma velata
Roell, Talita, Lemaître, Valérie A., Webb, Michael D. & Campos, Luiz A. 2023 |
velata (Arma)
Walker, F. 1868: 532 |