Hipparchia pellucida Stauder, 1924
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4559.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1FBE1872-5BA7-4E98-8D35-50C09D43F9E9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5935195 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A85A87DE-DC31-FFA3-25C5-FE09199DF9BF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hipparchia pellucida Stauder, 1924 |
status |
|
Hipparchia pellucida Stauder, 1924 View in CoL ssp. HESSELBARTHI Kudrna 1976
Atalanta 7 (3), 168–171 [169-170]. Combination still valid (see Kudrna, 1977)..
Paratype, 1 male, pinned.
Satyrus HYSIUS Godart , in Latreille & Godart, 1819 [1824]
Encyclopédie Méthodique Histoire Naturelle [Zoologie] 9. Entomologie 329–825 [525]. Current accepted combination: Calisto hysius (Godart, in Latreille & Godart, 1819 [1824]) (see D’Abrera, 1988; Lamas, 2004).
Lectotype, female (no.55) and paralectotype male (no.54), pinned underside uppermost on a strip of cork: Specimen data: Specimen reg. no. 55: “hysius” [Handwritten (by Godart) on coarse bluish paper]. “Dufresne” [Printed] on verso “ Satyrus | hysius | 68” [Handwritten]. “TYPE” [Handwritten on oval pink label]. “Dufresne | 1936-50 | 55” on verso “ Calisto hysius | Godart | TYPE” [Handwritten (by Grimshaw) on mauve paper]. Specimen reg. no. 54: Labels as no. 55 above only without Godart’s handwritten label and with registration no. 54. Remarks: Godart’s handwritten label indicates that specimen no.55 was present in the Dufresne collection when it was studied by Godart. The two form part of the type series. The lectotype was designated by Grimshaw (1897) when he stated that the female was “….the type.” Type locality unknown, but “nous le soupçonnons de l’Amérique septentrionale” [North America]. The species is an endemic of Hispaniola ( Haiti and Dominican Republic). Interestingly although the description was not published until 1824 it must have been written prior to 1818 as that name is used in the collection catalogue of that date (cf. Grimshaw 1897). An invalid “ neotype ” of Satyrus hysius Godart , [1824] was designated by Johnson & Hedges (1998).
Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus, 1758) View in CoL ssp. LEIGHEBI Kudrna, 1976 View in CoL
Atalanta 7 (3), 168–171 [168-169]. Current accepted combination: Hipparchia leighebi Kudrna, 1976 View in CoL (see Balletto, Cassulo & Bonelli, 2014).
Paratype, 1 male, pinned.
Hipparchia semele (Linnaeus, 1758) ssp. WILKINSONI Kudrna, 1977
A revision of the genus HIPPARCHIA Fabricius. E.W. Classey, Faringdon, Oxford. pp.300 [66–68], figures 236 and 237. Junior subjective synonym of Hipparchia semele semele (Linnaeus, 1758) (see Cesaroni et al., 1994). Paratypes, 3 males, 1 female, pinned (genitalia on slides L.1030(♂), L.1031(♂) and L.1032(♀).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hipparchia pellucida Stauder, 1924
Bland, Keith P. 2019 |
LEIGHEBI
Kudrna 1976 |
Hipparchia leighebi
Kudrna 1976 |