Gagea sect. Plecostigma (Turcz.) Pascher
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.15.1.6 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4907046 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A81987DC-B85A-FFA9-FF62-06B1CDAFFC78 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Gagea sect. Plecostigma (Turcz.) Pascher |
status |
|
Gagea sect. Plecostigma (Turcz.) Pascher
Both Pascher (1904, 1907) and Levichev (2006) accepted Gagea sect. Plecostigma . However, the species they included in this section were different. For example, G. afghanica Terracciano (1904: 3) and G. olgae Regel (1875: 292) were placed under G. sect. Platyspermum by Pascher (1907) and subsequently by Uphof (1958 – 1960), whereas Levichev (2006) believed these three species should be classified under G. sect. Plecostigma . Molecular analysis of Zarrei et al. (2009) and Peterson et al. (2008) confirmed Levichev's treatment of the section. Moreover, based on molecular data ( Zarrei et al. 2009) G. wendelboi Rechinger (1986: 291) , G. exilis Vvedensky (1946: 236) and G. chlorantha (M.Bieb.) Schultes & Schultes (1829: 551) should be transferred to G. sect. Plecostigma .
Palynomorphological data also support Levichev's treatment of the section because all members of the section have a foveolate or perforate pollen type and similar basal leaf transverse sections ( Zarrei & Zarre 2005). The possession of a cymose inflorescence and fibrous-papery tunic are synapomorphies for this section.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |