Micaelamys Ellerman 1941
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316535 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11335005 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A688C567-D484-3E40-FA2F-3798B93C9D39 |
treatment provided by |
Guido |
scientific name |
Micaelamys Ellerman 1941 |
status |
|
Micaelamys Ellerman 1941 View in CoL
Micaelamys Ellerman 1941 View in CoL , Families and Genera of Living Rodents, Vol. 2: 170.
Type Species: Mus granti Wroughton 1908
Species and subspecies: 2 species:
Species Micaelamys granti (Wroughton 1908)
Species Micaelamys namaquensis (A. Smith 1834)
Discussion: Aethomys Division. Formerly included in Aethomys as a subgenus, but a variety of data sets ranging from morphological to molecular indicate the two species discussed below belong in a monophyletic group, Micaelamys , separate from that containing species of Aethomys (see generic account of Aethomys ). References cited in the following accounts treated granti and namaquensis as species of Aethomys . Including Micaelamys with Aethomys in the same Division is provisional. In phylogenetic analyses of mtDNA cytochrome b sequences, Aethomys (represented by A. chrysophilus and A. kaiseri ) is closest to Grammomys , while Micaelamys ( M. namaquensis ) joins other African genera depending on the analyses ( Castiglia et al., 2003 b; Ducroz et al., 2001). Phylogenetic analyses employing a broader sampling of not only species in Aethomys but of endemic African murine genera using molecular, chromosomal, and morphological data sets may resolve the phylogenetic relationships of Aethomys and Micaelamys . Evolutionary history as documented by fossils extends back to the late Pliocene of South Africa (" A. cf. namaquensis "; Denys, 1990 c), and Pleistocene of Namibia (" Micaelamys "; Senut et al., 1992).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.