Tympanicheles ornatus (Holthuis, 1952)

de Gier, Werner & Fransen, Charles H. J. M., 2023, Polka-dotted treasures: Revising a clade of ascidian- and bivalve-associated shrimps (Caridea: Palaemonidae), Contributions to Zoology 92 (3), pp. 179-282 : 254-282

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1163/18759866-BJA10042

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A47E8796-EA69-0163-44CE-133E046EFEA0

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Tympanicheles ornatus (Holthuis, 1952)
status

 

Tympanicheles ornatus (Holthuis, 1952)

(figs. 36A–B, 37, 39A,C)

Paranchistus ornatus Holthuis, 1952: 97–100 View in CoL , figs. 39, 40 [type locality: Mozambique]; Barnard, 1955 (listed): 5; Barnard, 1958 (listed): 12; Rosewater, 1961: 195; Jacquotte, 1963: 61; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1967: 153–166; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1971: 194, figs. 4, 5 9; Bruce, 1972a: 219–221, colour figures (listed); Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1972a: 288, fig. 2a2; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1972b: 10, 14, 17, figs. 1a2–e2, 3a2, 3b2, 4a2–d2, 6b, 7a2–f2, 8a2–d2; Thomassin, 1972: 311; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1973a; 96–116, fig. 1a2–e2, 3a2–b2, 4a2–d2, 5, 6b, 7a2–f2, 8a2– d2; Hipaeu-Jacquotte, 1973b: 63–70; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1974a: 367–382; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1974b: 383–402; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1974c: 403–407; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1974d: 359–386; Thomassin, 1974:306; Bruce, 1975a:162 (listed); Bruce, 1976a: 93; Bruce, 1976d: 471: Monod, 1976a: 839 (listed); Bruce, 1978a: 119; Bruce, 1978b: 279; Bruce, 1980: 179, textfig. 1a, pl. 1 figs. a–c; Müller, 1993: 51 (listed); Fransen, 1994a: 107, 111, 112, fig. 2g, pl. 2 fig. 3; Fransen, 1994b: 117, fig. 2g, pl. 2D; Li, 2000: 111, fig. 121 (listed); De Grave & Fransen, 2011: 357 (listed); Chow et al., 2021: table A.1 (listed).

Material examined. RED SEA: 3 males pocl. 3.90, 4.22, 4.74 mm, 7 ovigerous females pocl. 7.40, 7.92, 8.18, 8.18, 8.31, 8.70, 8.83 mm ( RMNH. CRUS.D.41491), Nocra Island , 18.iii.1962, Israel Red Sea Expedition no. E62/2028. – 1 ovigerous female pocl. 6.10 mm ( RMNH. CRUS.D.41492), Loe Salina , 1965, in Atrina sp. , Israel Red Sea Expedition no. E65/1868. – 3 males pocl. 3.64, 3.90, 4.42 mm, 3 ovigerous females pocl. 7.53, 7.66, 8.70 mm ( RMNH. CRUS.D.41493), off Nocra Island , 17.iii.1962, in Atrina sp. , Israel

Red Sea Expedition no. E62/1350.– 1 male pocl. Island, 4°37’S 55°31’E, 25.xii.1992, depth 10 m; 5.32 mm, 1 ovigerous female pocl. 9.09 mm SCUBA diving, in Atrina vexillum (Born) , coll. ( RMNH. CRUS.D.41494), NE of Nocra Island, C.H.J.M. Fransen. 18.ii.1962, depth 2-3 m, in Atrina sp. (10049), Diagnosis. Rostrum well developed, lat- Israel Red Sea Expedition no. E62/1354. – erally compressed towards distal part, bent 3 males pocl. 4.35, 4.87, 4.94 mm ( RMNH. downwards, reaching end of te second seg- CRUS.D.41495), Nocra Island , 18.iii.1962, Israel ment of antennular peduncle, with 3–5 dor- Red Sea Expedition no. E62/2059. – 1 male sal distal teeth, without ventral distal teeth; pocl. 4.48 mm ( RMNH. CRUS.D.41496), Umm row of setae between dorsal teeth. Carapace Aabak, 4.v.1962, Israel Red Sea Expedition with well-developed antenna tooth, with no. 1452. – 2 males pocl. 3.05, 3.57 mm, 1 small articulating hepatic spine, situated female pocl. 5.52 mm, 1 ovigerous female pocl. somewhat posteroventrally of antennal spine; 6.36 mm ( RMNH. CRUS.D.41497), SW of Umm inferior orbital angle acute, slightly produced; Aabak, near Nocra Island , 22.iii.1962, depth anterolateral angle broadly rounded, slightly 0-3 m, in Atrina sp. , Israel Red Sea Expedition produced. Sixth abdominal segment with posno. E62/1379. MOZAMBIQUE: 1 male holo- terior ventral margin rounded. Telson with type pocl. 5.97 mm ( ZMA. CRUS.D.102827), two pairs of small dorsal spines at 0.58 and published by Holthuis , 1952: 97–100, figs. 39, 0.81 of telson length; lateral pair of terminal 40. SEYCHELLES: 1 ovigerous female pocl. spines placed just behind intermediate pair. 7.7 mm ( RMNH. CRUS.D.42794), NIOP-E stn Basal segment Downloaded of from antennular Brill.com peduncle 06/24/2024 with 12:38:05 AM SEY.748, E of Mahé, E coast of via Sainte Open Anne Access. This one is (seldom an open access two) distal article teeth distributed, anterior under margin the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 GoogleMaps /

almost straight; outer flagellum with basal 4–6 Second pereiopods usually equal in size and segments fused, free shorter ramus of two or shape in females, subequal in size in males; three segments. Scaphocerite well developed dactylus with one large tooth in proximal half;

with slightly convex lateral margin; distolat- fixed finger with 5–6 small teeth in proximal

eral tooth normal, almost reaching the distal half; palm with oblong ventral oval tympamargin of the lamina; slit between distolat- nal organ over entire length. Ambulatory

eral tooth and lamina shallow. First pereio- pereiopods with slender long slightly curved

pod slender, chela sub-spatulate, minutely non-biunguiculate Downloaded dactyli from Brill;.com serrated 06/24/2024 carinae12:38:05 AM pectinate in distal two-third of lateral via margin Open Access. on. This distoventral is an open access margin article of corpus distributed; unguis under not the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

flattened, dorsally and ventrally with trans- 2001: 107, 109, 135, fig.; Hayashi, 2002: 224, verse rows of scale-lake spinules. Uropod with figs. 432k, l, 434i, j, 435i, j; Hayashi, 2006: 510, protopodite posterolaterally acute, exopod 512; De Grave & Fransen, 2011: 340 (listed); with small mobile distolateral spine. Radhakrishnan et al., 2012: table 1 (listed); Remarks. Smaller specimens have the dor- Samuel et al., 2016: table 1 (listed).

sal rostral teeth in the distal fourth of the ros- Anchistus misakensis Yokoya, 1936: 136 , fig. 5 trum while larger specimens have them all at [Type locality: Octavia Bay, Nancowry Harbor, the tip. This indicates that the dorsal rostral Nicobars]; Holthuis, 1952: 13; Bruce, 1967: 568 teeth are placed more distally after each moult (key).

as has been observed in Anchistus australis . Material examined. JAPAN: 1 ovigerous Colour (figs. 36A,B). “Uniformly covered female pocl. 3.51 mm, 1 male pocl. 3.90 mm all over body and appendages with small red ( RMNH. CRUS.D.26972), Kanagawa prefecture, chromatophores, with minute yellow and Sagami Bay near Manazuru, S of Odawara, white chromatophores interspersed.” ( Bruce , 25.viii.1968, coll. H. Suzuki. INDONESIA: 1 1978a: 119; see colour figures Bruce, 1972a). non ovigerous female pocl. 1.8 mm ( RMNH.

Hosts. Reported from Pinnidae : Atrina vex- CRUS.D.47465), stn MAL.21, Moluccas, Ambon, illum (Born, 1778) (Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1967, Ambon bay, N coast Cape Hatupero, E of 1973b, 1974b; Bruce, 1976e, 1978a, 1978b, 1980; Lilibooi, 03°44’S 128°02’E, 20.xi.1996, depth Fransen, 1994b); Pinna bicolor Gmelin, 1791 10 m, SCUBA diving, in pectinid shell, coll.

( Rosewater, 1961; Hipeau-Jacquotte, 1967). C.H.J.M. Fransen. VANUATU: 1 non ovigerous Distribution. Distributed along the East female pocl. 1.6 mm ( RMNH. CRUS.D.58094), African coast: Mocambique (Holthuis, 1952); stn LD25, N Aoré, 15°19’29”S 167°06’19”E, Zanzibar and Kenya (cf. Rosewater, 1961; 7.x.2006, scuba diving, depth unknown. GoogleMaps

Bruce, 1976d, 1980), Madagascar (cf. Hipeau- Diagnosis. Rostrum well developed, lat- Jacquotte, 1967, 1971, 1972a, 1972b, 1973a, 1973b, erally compressed towards distal part, bent 1974a, 1974b, 1974c, 1974d; Thomassin, 1972, downwards; reaching just beyond basal seg- 1974; Bruce, 1978b), Comoro Islands (cf. Bruce, ment of antennular peduncle, with 3, seldom 1978a); Seychelles (Fransen, 1994b); Nocra 2 distal teeth with setae in between. Antennal Island, Red Sea (Fransen, 1994a). spine present, hepatic spine absent; inferior orbital angle slightly produced; anterolateral Tympanicheles pectinis (Kemp, 1925) angle rounded, not produced. Sixth abdom-

(figs. 36C,D, 38) inal segment with posterior ventral margin Anchistus pectinis Kemp, 1925: 327–330 , figs. rounded. Telson with dorsal pairs of spines 19, 20 [Type locality: Octavia Bay, Nancowry at 0.61 and 0.79 of telson length; lateral pair Harbor, Nicobars]; Holthuis, 1952: 13 (listed); of terminal spines placed just behind inter- Bruce, 1967: 568; Fujino & Miyake, 1967: 293- mediate pair. Basal segment of antennular 296, figs. 1–3; Suzuki, 1971: 101–106, figs. 5–7, pl. peduncle with one small distolateral tooth.

2; Bruce, 1972a: 219 (listed); Bruce, 1975a: 150, Scaphocerite with lateral margin almost 162 (listed); Bruce, 1976d: 465; Bruce, 1977b: straight, slit between distolateral tooth and 175–176, fig. 6e; Bruce, 1983c: 200 (listed); lamina of moderate depth. Chela of first Bruce, 1990: 15, 18 (listed); Bruce, 1991a: 261, pereiopods spatulate, with minutely pect- 275, fig. 24; Bruce, 1991b: 378–381, figs. 56–57, inate cutting edges distolaterally. Second

71 d-f; Müller, 1993: 11 (listed); Fransen, 1994a: pereiopods unequal; dactylus exceeding fixed 107, 111, fig. 2b; Bruce, 1996: 205, figs. 2, 3; Li, finger, distally Downloaded strongly from Brill hooked.com 06, with /24/2024 one12large:38:05 AM 2000: 12, fig. 12 (listed); Yamaguchi via& Open Holthuis Access,. This triangular is an open tooth access in article proximal distributed half, fixed under finger the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ with 4-6 small teeth in proximal half of which distalmost largest; palm with oblong oval tympanal organ on entire medio-ventral surface. Ambulatory dactyli simple; corpus with carinated ventral margin with small triangular subdistal denticle, distodorsally transversely wrinckled; unguis strongly hooked, not flattened, with transverse rows of minute scale-like spinules dorsally. Uropod with protopodite posterolaterally acute, exopod with small mobile distolateral spine.

Remarks. The variability in the development of the accessory tooth on the dactylus of the ambulatory pereiopods ranging from its absence in Kemp’s material to well developed in the type of Anchistus misakiensis Yokoya, 1936 and the illustrated specimen from New 1977b), Keppel Bay and Magnetic Island, Caledonia (indicated as Lagon, stn. CC 147) of Australia (Bruce, 1983b); New Caledonia Bruce (1991b) attributes to the opinion that A. (Bruce, 1991a,1991b,1996).Now newly recorded misakiensis is conspecific with Tympanicheles from Ambon, Indonesia, and Vanuatu.

pectinis . In the two specimens studied the

accessory tooth was absent or minute (fig.

38I). Differences in the male first endopod as Key to the genera of the ‘ Anchistus’ clade

noted by Bruce (1991b: 381) could be due to

different developmental stages involved. In 1. Unguis of ambulatory pereiopods with the present male (pocl. 3.90 mm) 13 spinules few scattered minute scales dorsally......2 are present on the proximal median margin. – Unguis of ambulatory pereiopods with

In the male specimen (pocl. 2.7 mm) from dense cover of minute scales dorsally...4 New Caledonia (Bruce, 1991b: fig. 56k) only 2. Ambulatory dactyli without obtuse comsix spinules are present while in a large male pressed ventral process.............................. 3 specimen (pocl. between 3.65 and 5.88 mm) – Ambulatory dactyli with obtuse comfrom Japan ( Suzuki, 1971: fig. 7.4) at least 10 pressed ventral process.................. Dasella spinules are present. 3. Ambulatory pereiopods biunguiculate; Colour (figs. 36C, D). “The body is translu- mobile hepatic spine present.................. cent. A number of reddish circular marking, .................................................... Paranchistus which are encircled with purplish colouration, – Ambulatory pereiopods simple; hepatic are found on the body and appendages; these spine absent....................................... Ensiger marks are variable in size and number. The 4. Rostrum laterally compressed, distally distal portion of the antennular and anten- acute, with teeth in distal part.................5 nal peduncles, the scaphocerite, the second – Rostrum broad, swollen, distally trunchela, the telson and the uropod is purplish in cate, without teeth............... Neoanchistus colour.” ( Suzuki, 1971: 13, textfig. 5, pl. 2). 5. Palm of second chelipeds with tympanal Hosts. Reported from Pectinidae : organ...............................................................6 Bractechlamys vexillum (Reeve, 1853) (Bruce, – Palm of second chelipeds without ven- 1996, as Semipallium vexillum (Reeve, 1853)) ; tral tympanal organ; mobile hepatic Mimachlamys crassicostata (G. B. Sowerby II, spine present........... Polkamenes gen. nov.

1842) (Hayashi, 2002, 2006, as Mimachlamys 6. Tympanal organ on palm of second nobilis (Reeve, 1852) ; Pecten albicans (Schröter, cheliped oblong; dorso-distal part of 1802) (Fujino & Miyake, 1967; Suzuki, 1971; corpus of ambulatory dactyli wrinkled Hayashi, 2002, 2006, as P. (Notovola) albi- ............................... Tympanicheles gen. nov.

cans); Pecten sp. (Kemp, 1925); Yilistrum bal- – Tympanal organ on palm of second loti (Bernardi, 1861) ( Yokoya, 1936; Suzuki, 1971; cheliped restricted to proximal part Bruce, 1977b, 1983b, 1991a, 1991b, 1996; Hayashi, of palm; dorso-distal part of corpus of 2002, 2006, as Amusium ‘ japonicum’ balloti ambulatory dactyli glabrous..... Anchistus (Bernardi, 1861)) ; Pectinid bivalve (Bruce,

1976d). Also one record from an unidentified

bivalve (Bruce, 1977b). Discussion

Distribution. Nicobar Islands (Kemp, 1925);

Zanzibar (Bruce, 1976d); Japan ( Yokoya, 1936; Outgroup placements

Fujino & Miyake, 1967; Suzuki, 1971; Hayashi, All outgroup Downloaded species from, except Brill.com Cuapetes 06/24/2024 tenuipes 12:38:05 AM 2002, 2006); Townsville, Australia via Open(Bruce Access,. This and is Palaemonella an open access rotumana article distributed, are part under of ‘Clade the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 5’ recovered by Horká et al. (2016), which has Allopontonia Bruce, 1972 , which appear to be

a topology that only partly matches the cur- somewhat related (Chow et al., 2021)).

rent results. The coral-associated Actinimenes

inornatus, A. ornatus , and Periclimenes kempi Uncertain placements and polytomies

split off as a separate clade in the phyloge- Although most ingroup clades seem to be

nies resulting from the concatenated and TE recovered in a similar way across the various alignment (figs. 1, 2). This seems to be con- analysis methods, there are a few species with gruent with the results of Horká et al. (2016). aberrant placements. Paranchistus armatus, Here , the present ingroup (consisting of three the type species of Paranchistus , was recovspecies) is a sister of a clade comprised of ered based on the concatenated alignment as a Lipkemenes lanipes , Periclimenes colemani , part of a large polytomy, including various out-

and Zenopontonia rex . In our analyses (TE and groups (see above) and the rest of the ingroup, concatenated datasets), these outgroups seem suggesting a basal placement of the species. In

to be placed elsewhere: L. lanipes is placed the tree based on the TE-approach, the species basal to a clade including both P. colemani , Z. is placed next to a clade including Ensiger cus-

rex , as well as the ingroup (figs. 1, 2); and Z. rex tos and E. custoides , with Dasella being placed

and P.colemani seem to be clustering together basal to this group. The morphological fea-

in all analyses. In the phylogeny reconstruc- tures placed P.armatus with the two species of

tion resulting from the concatenated data- Ensiger . Although this difference in placement

set, Z. soror clusters together with Z. rex and is not interfering with the taxonomic decisions P. colemani , while in the TE-analysis Z. soror made in this study, a more basal placement of

is placed basally to these species and the this species in the TE-approach would probaingroup (figs. 1, 2). Horká et al. (2016) found bly directly influence the low ML-value of the Z. soror to be basal to a clade containing all character state reconstruction of the common three before-mentioned outgroups, as well as ancestor (now p = 0.508; fig. 3) to be higher in

the ingroup. In Chow et al. (2021), the place- favour of a bivalve host.

ment of these species is also different, plac- The genera Anchistus and Paranchistus

ing Z. soror basal to the current ingroup, and were in need of reappraisal after being recov- L. lanipes basal to Z. rex and P. colemani (sim- ered as polyphyletic in the phylogeny recon-

ilar to Horká et al., 2016). One has to keep in struction (figs. 1, 2). Two species, however, mind that the present phylogeny reconstruc- were also represented by more than one lintions are based on two molecular markers, eage. This is only the case in the phylogenetic compared to four and eight markers used tree resulting from the concatenated molec-

by Horká et al. (2016) and Chow et al. (2021), ular dataset (fig. 1). First, Anchistus demani is which partially use the same sequences. represented by three specimens, two of which

In short, the systematic position of the cluster together (KP759379/KP725496 and selected outgroups remains elusive. In order JX185707) next to A. miersi . The other spec-

to explore the systematic position of all mem- imen, making the placement of the species

bers of our outgroup genera, a large-scale paraphyletic, is only represented by a newly systematic review, combining molecular and acquired 16S barcode ( RMNH. CRUS.D.48354), morphological data, is needed, especially and is placed basal to a clade comprising the involving Zenopontonia and related echino- other specimens of A. demani and A. miersi .

derm-associated genera (e.g., Sandimenes Li , This deviating placement is probably caused 2009, various members of Periclimenes , and by the limited Downloaded phylogenetic from Brill.com information 06/24/2024 12of:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 16S, when used on its own (supplementary limited morphological data, and can only be fig. S1). In a similar light, the specimens repre- resolved by increasing the number of morphosenting Ensiger custos are grouping together, logical characters (Neumann et al., 2021). The but in two lineages. Two specimens group present polytomous branch splits into three together (KF738360 and KJ584120), while monophyletic clades: Anchistus , Neoanchistus , one other specimen is placed basal to this and Tympanicheles . Considering the molecclade ( RMNH. CRUS.D.57963), in both the tree ular trees (fig. 1, supplementary figs. S1–S3), resulting from the TE-approach (fig. 2), as well the placement of the three Anchistus species

as the tree resulting from the concatenated and T. ornatus seems to be fixed. The placemolecular alignment (fig. 1). Again, this could ment of T. pectinis inside Tympanicheles , be the result from the first two specimens only solely based on morphology, is tentative but being represented by 16S (supplementary fig. convincing. What remains is the placement S1), while the latter is represented by both of Neoanchistus within this group; both spemolecular markers. cies’ placement is based solely on morpholog- Horká et al.(2016) included only three of the ical features, possibly causing the polytomy.

present ingroup species: Dasella herdmaniae Whether Neoanchistus should be placed more was recovered in a basal position to Ensiger basal to Tympanicheles , or closer to Anchistus , custoides and Polkamenes pycnodontae (sensu remains unclear. Acquiring DNA extractions Horká et al., 2016), which complies to the from fresh specimens of Neoanchistus may current results. Similarly, Chow et al. (2021) solve this polytomy in a future study (A.Anker, recovered a clade including E. custoides and pers. comm.).

E. custos as a sister group to a clade including

P. pycnodontae and an unidentified species of Host switching

Paranchistus (probably part of Polkamenes ). An ancestral character state reconstruction This clade was, however, recovered as a sis- of the host affiliations resulted in ML probater to a branch containing D. herdmaniae and bilities for all nodes in the tree based on the Tympanicheles ornatus (Chow et al., 2021) . In TE-approach (fig. 3, supplementary fig. S4, our results, Dasella is always placed basally to supplementary table S3). Most interesting are the other mentioned species and T. ornatus is nodes where host switching might have hapgrouped together with the more derived spe- pened, and the host affiliation of the common cies of the ingroup (figs. 1, 2). The 16S barcode ancestor of the entire ingroup. In this case, a

of T. ornatus featured in Chow et al. (2021) is single host switch seemed to have happened the same as the one used in the current study, in the split from the common ancestor of the only here it is accompanied by a COI-barcode entire ingroup.In contrast to the other bivalveprovided by Aznar-Cormano et al. (2015). and ascidian-associated palaemonid clade (de Based on this, we believe that a more derived Gier et al., 2022), which appeared to have an placement of T. ornatus is correct. ascidian-associated ancestor, the common The phylogenetic trees that are solely based ancestor of the present ingroup was recovered on molecular data (fig. 1, supplementary as a bivalve-associated species, albeit with a figs. S1–S3) do not pose problems regarding low probability (fig. 3, supplementary fig. S4, polytomies. The tree resulting from combined supplementary table S3). Consequently, there molecular and morphological data, however, seems to have been one host switch from a shows one major polytomous split (fig. 2). bivalve to an ascidian in the branch includ- Polytomies are common in trees based on ing Dasella Downloaded. Horká from et al. (Brill.com 2016) were 06/24/2024 not able 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ to recover an ancestral host affiliation from have a similar spotted pattern, although two

the currently studied clade, and Chow et al. groups can be distinguished by their spots (2021) recovered the ancestral node of the and colouration (Bruce, 1972a; supplemenentire clade as a bivalve-associated species. tary appendix S1, supplementary table S2).

This node also included various species of the Minute white, red or yellow spots can be found echinoderm-associated genera Zenopontonia , in Dasella , Tympanicheles ornatus and both Sandimenes , Lipkemenes Bruce & Okuno, 2010 , species of Ensiger . In addition, minute spots

etc., and one free-living species, Periclimenes can also be found in the more closely related josephi Li, 2008 . outgroups, like Zenopontonia , Lipkemenes

and Periclimenes kempi , confirming the basal Phylogenetical significance of placement of some of the before-mentioned

morphological features species. Larger spots, usually a combination

Comparing phylogenetic trees resulting from of both blue and red (or orange) chromato-

the concatenated molecular alignment and phores, can be found in all other ingroup spe-

the morphological character state dataset cies: Anchistus australis , A. demani , A. miersi , could give us an insight in which morpho- Polkamenes pycnodontae , P. spondylis , and logical characters are more phylogenetically additionally to some extent in Tympanicheles significant than others. Previous authors have ornatus . The colour pattern of T. ornatus made some remarks on the subject, which resembles the minute spots of E. custoides

will be discussed below, together with new (figs. 20, 36), although closer inspection (e.g., findings. MNHN-IU-2010-4971) reveals that the yellow Bruce (1975b, 1976a) mentioned that the spots are larger and that additional orange “irrelevant” colour patterns of Anchistus spots are present. Projection of the colour pat-

(s.l.) have little specific relevance due to the terns on the molecular trees show that larger shrimps endosymbiotic lifestyle and their spots are derived characters and that they are monogamous mating system (Neo et al., 2015). only found in symbionts of larger bivalves.

This implies that the conspicuous colourations The presence of minutely pectinate cutting

have no obvious advantages or disadvantages edges of spatulate to subspatulate first cheli- (Bruce, 1976a). Consequently, there would be peds is considered to be a definitive charac-

no strong selection pressure for this character. ter for the studied ingroup genera (e.g., Bruce,

The whole ingroup clade can be seen exhibit- 1995; Fransen & Van der Meij, 2010), but was

ing a spotted (or polka-dotted) colour pattern also found in the related outgroup species

(figs. 4, 17, 20, 33, 36; Bruce, 1972a), with the Lipkemenes , Zenopontonia , Actinimenes and exception of Neoanchistus (fig. 28; A. Anker, both Periclimenes colemani and P. kempi

pers. comm.), and to some extent A. pectinis . (supplementary appendix S1, supplemen-

The colour pattern of Neoanchistus and A. tary table S2). A quick investigation also pectinis somewhat resembles that of other proves that Sandimenes and various memendosymbiotic shrimps, such as those of the bers of Periclimenes and Allopontonia (which genus Platypontonia Bruce, 1968 (see de Gier et were proven to be somewhat related to the

al., 2022). Why these species exhibit a distinct currently studied ingroup by Chow et al., pattern of larger red spots is unknown, but this 2021) also have subspatulate first chelipeds,

may be concordant with the species’ aberrant although the associated minutely pectinate

host choice, consisting of pectinid and cardiid cutting edges cannot be seen in the published bivalves. All other ingroup species appear to illustrations Downloaded (Bruce,from 1971Brill, 1972.com b, 06 1995 /24/2024, 2010 12b:38;:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Li, 2009; Rauch et al., 2019), except for the 39E, F). Although the systematic position of T.

illustrations of P. josephi , which show “a dis- pectinis , A. gravieri , and Neoanchistus cannot tal row of pectinate short setae” (Li, 2008b). be confirmed with the current molecular data, Closer examination of collection material is T. ornatus has a more basal placement than A.

needed in order to see if minutely pectinate australis , A. demani , and A. miersi (fig. 1). Thus, cutting edges are also present in related ecto- it seems that a dinstinctly outlined smaller symbiotic species. The potential function of organ evolved from a less clearly delimited the (sub)spatulate cheliped shape is currently larger organ. More morphological and histounknown, although it may be linked to the logical work is needed in order to see if the dietary habits of the shrimp. Species could surface of the tympanal organ is homologous be using the minor chelipeds to harvest and to the outer surface of the chelae of other spedigest their hosts’ mucus and ‘steal’ food par- cies in the ingroup. The potential function of ticles, such as in E. custos (Johnson & Liang, the organ is unknown, and a potential link 1966), although the cheliped morphology of to the host choice could also not be found E. custos and E. custoides is quite aberrant (with T. ornatus occupying the same hosts (e.g., fig. 27A). Interestingly, De Grave et al. as Ensiger ). Similar drum-looking organs are (2021) concluded that representatives of the used for interspecies communication, host currently studied clade, Actinimenes ornatus , detection, or predator avoidance in various Zenopontonia soror , and Anchistus miersi , groups of insects (described as a ‘tympanum’: were facultative or obligate parasites, feed- Yack, 2004; Strauss & Lakes-Harlan, 2014) and ing from the hosts’ tissue. Comparatively, as a ‘directional air motion sensor’ in the spithe limited information on the bivalve-asso- der genus Hortipes Bosselaers & Ledoux, 1998 ciated species from the other endosymbiotic ( Ramírez, 2014). Perhaps the functionality of palaemonid clade (de Gier et al., 2022) were the drum-like organ for shrimps can be found found to feed from host mucus strands and/ in the field of bioacoustics (e.g., Lovell et al.,

or pseudofeces (Kennedy et al., 2001; Ashelby 2005). In crustaceans, similarly looking struc-

et al., 2015). In addition, Pontonia pinnophylax tures called ‘gas windows’ or also ‘tympana’ (Otto, 1821) was found to be feeding from sim- can be seen in the last walking leg pairs and ilar carbon sources as its host (De Grave et al., sometimes thoracic sternites of semi-ter- 2021), making it a ‘true’ commensal symbiont. restrial sand bubbler crabs (Brachyura: The flat oval-shaped ‘tympanal’ organ Dotillidae ), which they use for osmoregulafound on the underside of the second cheli- tion (Matsumasa et al., 2001). In various other peds was first described and figured by semi-terrestrial crabs, small ‘window-like’ Monod (1976a) for Anchistus miersi . This organs called ‘Barth’s myochordotonal structure can be found in various members organs’ can be found, which play a role in

of the ingroup: Anchistus australis , A. dem- intraspecific communication, being able to ani, A. miersi , and A. gravieri bear major claws respond to vibrations transmitted through with small, distinct tympanal organs (fig. 39B, the exoskeleton from the substrate and the D–F), while both species of Tympanicheles , air (Davie et al., 2015). In male Australian Neoanchistus nasalis , and possibly N. cardi- freshwater crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus odytes , bear major claws with larger, less-pro- (von Martens, 1868), sexually dimorphic ‘red nounced tympanal organs (fig. 39A, C). In A. patches’ on the propodus of the major claws’ australis , the ‘veil’ is much thinner than the can be found. The function of this uncalsurrounding rim and the rest of the claw (fig. cified structure Downloaded from was reviewed Brill.com by 06/24/2024 Karplus 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ et al. (2003) and hypothesized to be a sensory (Fransen, 2002; de Gier & Fransen, 2018). In organ, possibly used in intraspecific social addition, both species of Ensiger have no interactions. Various species of amphipods accessory teeth whatsoever (figs. 22E, 27D).

within the Bogidiellidae , Niphargidae , and Higher up in the tree (see fig. 1), Polkamenes Ingolfiellidae exhibit ‘windows’ in the cuticle pycnodontae (as well as P. spondylis and P.

of the pereiopods, pleon, and pereion, called nobilii ) exhibit a strong accessory tooth (figs.

‘lentiform organs’ ( Pretus & Stock, 1990). 34K, L, 35S), while Tympanicheles ornatus has

As for now, the function of these structures just one minor denticle (fig. 37H). Similar to T.

remains unknown (Vonk & Schram, 2003). ornatus , T. pectinis , A. gravieri , as well as both

In addition, a semi-transparent structure species of Neoanchistus (although the struc-

can be found on the dorsal sides of the heads tures on the illustrations of N. cardiodytes of

of ‘mountain shrimp’ ( Anaspidacea ) in the Bruce (1975a) are difficult to identify) bear genus Allanaspides Swain, Wilson, Hickman none or one small denticle on the flexor mar-

& Ong, 1970, which resembles the structures gin (fig. 29E). The elusive T. liui also has no found in amphipods, mentioned above (Vonk accessory teeth (Li et al., 2004). Interestingly,

& Schram, 2003). the species in the more derived clade of

The walking legs’ (third to fifth pair of Anchistus , comprised of A. australis , A. dempereiopods’) dactyli bear many of the char- ani, and A. miersi , show a presence of a larger acteristic features used for species and gen- accessory tooth, most apparent in A. miersi

era identifications within the present shrimp (figs. 5L, M, 6J, 16G). In contrast, the microclade (Fransen, 2002). In most cases, the scopic spinules which can be found on the dactyli are well-illustrated in taxonomic liter- dorsal surface of the unguis, can exclusively ature, revealing the wide range of morpholog- be found in the more derived lineages, and is

ical ornamentations and setation patterns on not found in Ensiger and Dasella . Paranchistus

the corpus and unguis. Although homology armatus exhibits a few microspinules on the

and sequential evolution in the structures unguis, although preliminary SEM-images

are sometimes hard to dinstinguish (supple- prove that these structures are not homolomentary appendix S1; supplementary table gous (de Gier et al., unpublished observation).

S2), some characters give the impression to

be unique to bivalve- and ascidian-associated Sexual dimorphic and ontogenetic

endosymbiotic shrimp (Fransen, 1994a, 2002; characters

de Gier & Fransen, 2018; de Gier et al., 2022). To keep the dataset uniform, mostly female However, Chow et al. (2021) showed that the ovigerous specimens were used to score overall shape of a ‘biunguiculate’ dactylus has almost all of the character states (with the evolved many times in both endo- and ecto- exception of the exclusively male features), symbionts, and bears no phylogenetic signal both regarding data from the literature as

on a higher taxonomic level. Similarly, in the from collected material (supplementary present clade, traces of convergent evolu- appendix S1, supplementary table S2). Since

tion can be found in the accessory teeth on the species in the ingroup are considered to

the flexor margin of the dactylar corpus: all exhibit reverse sexual dimorphism (Baeza species of Dasella show a blunt, distoventral et al., 2013), the morphological characters process (fig. 19D), while Paranchistus armatus of the bigger female specimens are easier

has a somewhat sharper tooth (fig. 30J; almost to score. The differences between male and resembling species of Pontonia and Odontonia female specimens Downloaded can from Brill mostly.com be 06/24found /2024 12in:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ the abdominal region (male and female first a juvenile shrimp found in a boring mussel

and second pleopods, size of abdominal seg- ( Spengleria mytiloides (Lamarck, 1818) belongments), which has an inclusion that is limited ing to the Gastrochaenidae ; Fransen & Van

in the morphological analysis. The bigger size der Meij, 2010). The specimen is thought to be

of females may result in a stronger selection related to the species in the currently studied

for ecomorphological characters, due to the ingroup, and was described as an unknown limited size of their hosts’ internal cavities. species of Anchistus (Fransen & Van der Meij,

This link has not been studied in palaemonid 2010), although its juvenile characters could shrimp as for now, although there is strong not be included in the morphological analysis.

evidence for sex-related selection pressure in

other crustaceans with more extreme sexual

dimorphisms (e.g., where males visit seden- Conclusions

tary females in gall and pea crabs (Brachyura:

Cryptochiridae , Pinnotheridae ); Van der Meij, New distributions, hosts, and classification

2014; Vehof et al., 2016; de Gier & Becker, In this study, numerous new records of dis- 2020). Sexual dimorphism in the colouration tribution ranges and host affiliations are

of the chromatophores (dichromatism) was presented, summarized in table 2. In addirecently found in Anchistus miersi , with the tion, this study establishes three new genera,

male showing red spots, and the female blue and resulted in some additional taxonomic spots (Neo et al., 2015). This causes no prob- changes (table 2).

lems in our dataset (supplementary appendix

S1, supplementary table S2). Future perspectives

All chosen characters were picked based on The analyses revealed two genera to be poly-

their visibility in adult specimens, since juve- phyletic and that three genera needed to be

nile anatomy may differ a lot from their adult (re)erected to make a naturally sound classi-

form (Fransen, 1994a). In most cases, these fication. Various species of the present study juvenile characters are easily distinguisha- did not have any molecular data, causing

ble, such as a shorter rostrum and relatively various branches to have low support values larger eyes (Fransen, 2002, 2006). In extreme and their exact evolutionary placement to cases, juvenile characters may be completely remain uncertain. Similar to an earlier study reduced in the adult stages, and can provide (de Gier et al. 2022), additional molecular erroneous character states. Examples can data are needed for this clade to obtain bet-

be seen in the (articulate) hepatic spine of ter supported and resolved phylogeny recon- Paranchistus armatus , which is much larger in structions regarding host associations and juveniles than in adults (Bruce, 1975c). More ancestral state reconstructions, which would extreme examples can be found in the ‘biun- require more field observations and studies guiculate’ juvenile dactyli of the walking legs addressing the feeding habits, host choices,

of Tympanicheles pectinis , which grow away in and distribution ranges.

later stages (Bruce, 1996), and in the juvenile Some authors have suggested that the molrostrum morphology of Anchistus australis , lusc- and ascidian-associated shrimp clades which grows from an acute to a more rounded display various host-specific (eco)morphologshape (Fransen, 1994a). Some juvenile char- ical adaptations (Bruce, 1972a, 1976a; Fransen, acters result in unknown species-identifica- 1994a), although the statistical evidence for tions, as is the case for a single specimen of this is limited Downloaded (Dobson from et Brill al..,com 2014 06, 2016 /24/2024; Chow 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Species Taxonomic New locality records New host records name changes

Anchistus A. australis – Indonesia: West Papua: Raja Ampat;

NE Kalimantan; Nanaka Is., Sulawesi .

Malaysia: Tioman Is. A. demani – Indonesia: N Sulawesi; NE Kalimantan; Hippopus hippopus ;

Red Sea; Palau; Philippines: Cebu strait. Tridacna deresa ;

Tridacna crocea

(confirmed after

Bruce, 1979a) A. gravieri – Vanuatu Tridacna sp. A . miersi – Micronesia: Caroline Islands. Indonesia: –

NW Java: Thousand Islands ; NE and S

Kalimantan; West Papua: Numfor; SW and

N Sulawesi; Mollucas: NW Seram. Dasella D. ansoni – – – D. brucei – – – D. – Vanuatu: Tutuba Is. Indonesia : N, SW, Polycarpa sp. ; herdmaniae and NE Sulawesi; Mollucas: Ambon; Phallusia sp.

Halmahera; NW Java: Thousand Islands ;

West Papua: Raja Ampat. Ensiger E. custoides Transferred Indonesia: Ambon; Kera Is. near Timor; Atrina pectinata

from Komodo; NW Java: Thousand Islands ;

Anchistus Bali; NE and SW Sulawesi, Halmahera; W

Papua: Raja Ampat; NE Kalimantan: Berau

Islands. Vanuatu. Philippines: Cebu strait. E. custos Transferred Indonesia: NW Java: Thousand Islands; Atrina pectinata

from Sunda Islands ; SW Sulawesi ; West Papua .

Anchistus Japan. Oman: Masicoh (?). Saudi Arabia. Neoanchistus N. – – – cardiodytes N. nasalis – – – Paranchistus P. armatus – Indonesia: Moluccas; Kei Islands, –

Tanimbar. Polkamenes gen. nov.

et al., 2021). Ecomorphological analyses using Eurlings (all Naturalis Biodiversity Center) are

new imaging methods (µCT-scanning, SEM), thanked for their assistance generating the combined with ecological and molecular DNA-barcodes which were used during this

data may help us to understand how exactly study.Collection managers Jeroen Goud, Bram

the currently studied species have adapted to van der Bijl, and Esther Dondorp (all Naturalis

their endosymbiotic way of life. Biodiversity Center) are thanked for their sup-

port during the examinations of the physical specimens. Bertie-Joan van Heuven and Dirk Acknowledgements van der Marel (both Naturalis Biodiversity Center) are thanked for their assistance man-

The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Bert ning the SEM and µCT scanner in the Naturalis W. Hoeksema (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, imaging facilities. Research interns Jurriaan Rijksuniversiteit Groningen), Dr. Ronald van den Oever en Pepijn Helleman are Vonk (Naturalis Biodiversity Center), and Dr. thanked for their help in the SEM lab, acquir- Jeroen Hubert (Universiteit Leiden) for their ing images of the dactyli and claws of various helpful comments and feedback during the species studied in this paper. Dr. Arthur Anker writing phase of this project. The lab-techni- (King Abdullah University of Science and cians Frank Stokvis, Roland Butôt, and Marcel Technology Downloaded, Saudi Arabia from) is Brill.com thanked 06/24/2024 for his 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ contributing colour pictures of Neoanchistus (chief scientist Dr. B.W. Hoeksema) and the cardiodytes and N. nasalis (fig. 28), and Jeroen RCO-LIPI (chief scientist Dr.Suharsono),as part Goud (Naturalis Biodiversity Center) for the of the NWO-LIPI East Kalimantan Programme.

identification of the Vasticardium host of The ‘Thousand Islands Expedition, September N. cardiodytes . In addition, two anonymous 2005’, organized by the RCO-LIPI and the NNM.

reviewers are thanked for their helpful com- The ‘ SANTO 2006 Global Biodiversity Survey’ ments and suggestions, which helped to was initiated by the Muséum national d’Hisimprove the manuscript. Mr. H.L Strack organ- toire naturelle, Paris ( MNHN), Institut de ized the ‘Rumphius Biohistorical Expedition’ Recherche pour le Développement ( IRD) and (1990) to Ambon, in cooperation with the ProNatura International. Dr. Philippe Bouchet Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum ( NNM; acted as expedition leader for the marine now Naturalis Biodiversity Center), Leiden, theme. The ‘2007 Raja Ampat expedition’ the Netherlands; Oceanological Institute, was organized by the NNM (at that time NCB Indonesian Institute of Sciences ( LIPI, now Naturalis) and RCO-LIPI, under the umbrella RCO-BRIN); and Universitas Pattimura, both of Ekspedisi Widya Nusantara (E-Win) of LIPI.

from Ambon, Indonesia. The R. V. ‘Tyro’ We are grateful to LIPI for granting research ‘Oceanic Reefs Expedition’ to the Seychelles permits and to Dr. B.W. Hoeksema for his (1992–1993) was organized by the NNM, and efforts in organizing the expedition. The the Netherlands Indian Ocean Program. Dr. ‘ Ternate expedition’ in the northern Moluccas

J. van der Land ( NNM) was chief-scientist was organised by the RCO-LIPI and the NNM

at these cruises. The ‘ Sulawesi expedition’ (at that time Naturalis Biodiversity Center).

(1994) was organized was organised by the This expedition was part of the Ekspedisi NNM in cooperation with the Hasanuddin Widya Nusantara project (E-Win expeditions), University at Makassar ( UNHAS) and the field with chief-scientists Dr. B.W. Hoeksema and station of the Oceanological Institute of LIPI Ir. M.I.Y. Tuti ( PPPO-LIPI). The ‘Semporna

at Bitung with chief-scientist Dr. J. van der Marine Ecological Expedition’ (2010) was Land. The ‘Maluku Expedition’ (1996) was jointly organized by WWF-Malaysia, Universiti organised by the NNM in cooperation with the Malaysia Sabah’s Borneo Marine Research Oceanological Institute of LIPI at Ambon with Institute, Naturalis Biodiversity Center and chief-scientist Dr. J. van der Land and counter- Universiti Malaya’s Institute of Biological part Dr. Dwi Listyo Rahayu ( LIPI). The ‘Cebu Sciences. Research permission was granted Strait’ Expedition (2000) by the NNM and the by Economic Planning Unit, Prime Minister’s University of San Carlos ( USC), Cebu, with Department, Economic Planning Unit Sabah, chief-scientists Dr. Bert W. Hoeksema, Dr. Sabah Parks and Department of Fisheries Thomas Heeger ( USC) and Dr. Filipina B. Sotto Sabah. Dr. B.W. Hoeksema and Ms. Zarinah ( USC). The ‘Lombok Strait’ Expedition (2001) Waheed acted as expedition leaders for the by the NNM, the Center of Oceanological biodiversity theme. The ‘Marine Biodiversity Research and Development ( PPPO) of LIPI in Workshop at Lembeh Strait’ (2012) was organ- Jakarta, and the World Wildlife Foundation ized by Universitas Sam Ratulangi ( UNSRAT in ( WWF) Wallacea project at Denpasar, with Manado) and the Bitung field station of the chief-scientists Dr. B.W. Hoeksema and Ir. M.I. Research Centre of Oceanography ( RCO-LIPI) Yosephine Tuti ( PPPO-LIPI). The 2003 ‘Berau in cooperation with Naturalis Biodiversity 2003’ expedition around the Berau Islands, Center. Prof. Dr. Suharsono, former director East Kalimantan was organised by the NNM of the Downloaded Research from Centre Brill.com for Oceanography 06/24/2024 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ( PPO-LIPI), is acknowledged for his sup- relationships in Caridean decapods. Genetica, port. Prof. Dr. Markus T. Lasut (Universitas 143, 195–205. doi: 10.1007/s10709-014-9807-0. SamRatulangi), Dr. B.W. Hoeksema, and Ir. Baeza, J.A., Ritson-Williams, R. & Fuentes, M.S. Y. Tuti ( PPO-LIPI) acted as workshop coor- (2013) Sexual and mating system in a caridean dinators. Dr. Francesca Benzoni organized shrimp symbiotic with the winged pearl oyster the ‘Marine Biodiversity Workshop’ (2014) at in the Coral Triangle. J. Zool., 289, 172–181. the Marine Research and Higher Education doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2012.00974.x. Centre University of Milano-Bicocca, Barnard, K.H. (1955) Additions to the fauna-list Magoodhoo Island, Faafu Atoll, Republic of South African Crustacea and Pycnogonida. of Maldives. Prof. Mike Berumen (Red Sea Ann. S. Afr. Mus ., 43(1), 1–107. Research Center, King Abdullah University Barnard, K.H. (1958) Further additions to the of Science and Technology, KAUST), hosted crustacean fauna-list of Portuguese East Africa. a Naturalis field team under leadership of Mem. Museu Dr.Álvaro de Castro, 4, 3–23. Dr. B.W. Hoeksema in November 2014 off the Berggren, M. (1990) Dasella herdmaniae (Lebour) Red Sea coast of Thuwal, Saudi Arabia. ( Decapoda : Natantia: Pontoniinae ) from

Moçambique and establishment of a new

species, Dasella brucei . J. Crustacean Biology, 10, Supplementary material 554–559.

Borradaile, L.A. (1898) A revision of the Supplementary material is available online at: Pontoniidae. Ann. Mag. Nat ., 2(7), 376–391. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22310059. Borradaile, L.A. (1900) On the Stomatopoda and

Macrura brought by Dr. Willey from the South

Seas. Pp. 395–428, pls 336–339 in: Willey, A. References (ed.) Zoological results based on the material

from New Britain, New Guinea, Loyalty Islands Al-Kandari, M., Anker, A., Hussain, S., Al-Yassen, and elsewhere collected during the years 1895, S., Sattari, Z. & De Grave, S. (2020) New 1896, and 1897. Cambridge University Press: records of decapod crustaceans from Kuwait Cambridge. ( Malacostraca: Decapoda ). Zootaxa, 4803(2), Borradaile, L.A. (1915) Notes on Carides. Ann. Mag. 251–280. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4803.2.2. Nat ., 15(8), 205–213. Anker, A. & De Grave, S. (2016) An updated and Borradaile, L.A. (1917) The Percy Sladen Trust annotated checklist of marine and brackish Expedition to the Indian Ocean in 1905, under caridean shrimps of Singapore ( Crustacea, the leadership of Mr. J. Stanley Gardiner, M.A. Decapoda ). Raffles B. Zool. Suppl., 34, 343–454. No. VIII. On the Pontoniinae . Trans. Linn. Soc. Ashelby, C.W., De Grave, S. & Johnson, M.L. (2015) London, (2) Zoology, 17, 323–396. Preliminary observations on the mandibles of Bouchet, P., Le Guyader, H. & Pascal, O. (2011) palaemonoid shrimp ( Crustacea: Decapoda : The ‘‘Making of’’ Santo 2006. In: Bouchet, P., Caridea : Palaemonoidea ). PeerJ, 3, e846. doi: Le Guyader, H. & Pascal, O. (eds.), The Natural 10.7717/peerj.846. History of Santo. Patrimoines Naturels, 70. Aznar-Cormano, L., Brisset, J., Chan, T.-Y., Corbari, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, IRD, L., Puillandre, N., Utge, J., Zbinden, M., Marseille and Pro-Natura International, Paris, Zuccon, D. & Samadi, S. (2015) An improved pp. 529–548. taxonomic sampling is a necessary but not Bourdon, R., (1983) Expédition Rumphius II sufficient condition for resolving inter-families (1975). In Downloaded: Monod, Th from. (ed.) Crustacés Brill.com parasites 06/24/2024, 12:38:05 AM

via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms

of the CC-BY 4.0 license.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

commensaux, etc. VIII. Crustacés Isopodes (3e shrimp from Madagascar ( Decapoda : partie; Épicarides Bopyridae). Bull. Mus . natl. Palaemonidae ). Crustaceana, 29, 149–165.

hist. nat., (4) 5, Sect. A(3), 845–869. Bruce, A.J. (1975b) Coral reef shrimps and their Brinkmann, B.W. & Fransen, C.H.J.M. (2016) colour patterns. Endeavour, 34, 23–27. Identification of a new stony coral host for Bruce, A.J. (1975c) Pontonia armata H. Milne the anemone shrimp Periclimenes rathbunae Edwards ( Decapoda Natantia , Pontoniinae ) – a Schmitt, 1924 with notes on the host-use correction. Crustaceana, 29, 49–54.

pattern. Contrib. Zool., 85, 437–456. Bruce, A.J. (1976a) Coral Reef Caridea and Britayev, T.A. & Fachrutdinov, R. R. (1994) ‘Commensalism.’ Micronesica, 12, 83–98.

Shrimps associated with molluscs at the Bruce, A.J. (1976b) A report on some pontoniinid seashore of South Vietnam: ecological notes. shrimps collected from the Seychelle Islands by In: Hydrobionts of South Vietnam: 122–139. the F. R. V. Manihine , 1972, with a review of the Moskva Nauka. [In Russian with English Seychelles pontoniinid shrimp fauna. Zool. J. summary]. Linn. Soc. London, 59, 89–153.

Broderip, W.J. (1841) Shrimps. In: Penny Bruce, A.J. (1976c) A report on a small collection of Cyclopaedia of the Society for the Diffusion of shrimps from the Kenya National Marine Parks Useful Knowledge, volume 21, 419–428. Charles at Malindi, with notes on selected species. Zool. Knight, London. Verh., 145, 3–72.

Bruce, A.J. (1967) The results of the re-examination Bruce, A.J. (1976d) A synopsis of the pontoniinid

of the type specimens of some pontoniid shrimp fauna of Central East Africa. J. Mar. Biol. shrimps in the collection of the Muséum Assoc. India, 16 [for 1974], 462–490 .

national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris. Bull. Mus . Bruce, A.J. (1976e) A report on a small collection of natl. hist. nat., (2) 39, 564–572. pontoniine shrimps from the Northern Indian Bruce, A.J. (1971) On a new commensal shrimp Ocean. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 16 [for 1974], Periclimenes hirsutus sp. nov. ( Crustacea, 437–454.

Decapoda Natantia , Pontoniinae ) from Fiji. Pac. Bruce, A.J. (1976f) Shrimps and prawns of coral Sci., 25, 91–99. reefs with special reference to commensalism. Bruce, A.J. (1972a) Shrimps that live with molluscs. In: Jones O.A. & Endean, R. (eds.) Biology and Sea Frontiers, 18, 218–227. geology of coral reefs Vol. III: Biology 2, pp 37– Bruce, A.J. (1972b) Notes on some Indo-Pacific 94. Academic Press, New York.

Pontoniinae . XIX. Allopontonia iani gen nov., sp. Bruce, A.J. (1977a) Pontoniine shrimps in the nov., a new echinoid associate from Zanzibar. collections of the Australian Museum. Rec. Crustaceana, 22, 1–12. Aust. Mus ., 31(2), 39–81.

Bruce, A.J.(1973)The pontoniinid shrimps collected Bruce, A.J. (1977b) A report on a small collection

by the Yale Seychelles Expedition, 1957-1958 of pontoniine shrimps from Queensland, ( Decapoda , Palaemonidae ). Crustaceana, 24, Australia. Crustaceana, 33(2), 167–181.

132–142. Bruce, A.J. (1978a) Pontoniinid shrimps from the Bruce, A.J. (1974) A report on a small collection of ninth cruise of R / V Anton Bruun, IIOE, 1964, pontoniinidshrimpsfromtheislandofFarquhar II. The remaining genera. B. Mar. Sci., 28(1), ( Decapoda , Palaemonidae ). Crustaceana, 27, 118–136.

189–203. Bruce, A.J. (1978b) A report on a collection of Bruce, A.J. (1975a) Notes on some Indo-Pacific pontoniine shrimps from Madagascar and Pontoniinae . XXVI. Neoanchistus cardiodytes adjacent seas. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. London, 62, gen. nov. sp. nov., a new mollusc-associated 205–290 Downloaded. from Brill.com 06/24/2024 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Bruce, A.J. (1978c) Paranchistus pycnodontae sp. Bruce, A.J. (1984) Marine caridean shrimps of the

nov., a new pontoniine shrimp associated with Seychelles. In: Stoddart, D. R. (ed.) Biogeography

an ostreid bivalve host. Mem. Queens. Mus ., 18, and ecology of the Seychelles Islands, 8, 142– 233–243. 169. Junk, The Hague.

Bruce, A.J. (1979a) Records of some pontoniine Bruce, A.J. (1986) Logerende på koralrevet – rejer i shrimps from the South China Sea. Cah. Indo- samliv med mange andre dyr. Naturens Verden,

Pac., 1(2), 215–248. 5, 166 [in Danish].

Bruce, A.J. (1979b) A report on a small collection Bruce, A.J. (1989) A report on some coral reef

of pontoniine shrimps from Eniwetok Atoll. shrimps from the Philippine Islands. Asian Mar.

Crustaceana, Suppl. 5, 209–230. Biol., 6, 173–192.

Bruce, A.J. (1980) SEM observations on the Bruce, A.J. (1990) Recent additions to the ambulatory dactyls of some pontoniine pontoniine shrimp fauna of Australia. The shrimps ( Decapoda Caridea ). Crustaceana, Beagle, 7(2), 9–20.

38(2), 178–182. Bruce, A.J. (1991a) Crustacea Decapoda : Shallow- Bruce, A.J. (1981a) Notes on some Indo-Pacific water palaemonoid shrimps from New Pontoniinae, XXXVII additional information Caledonia ( Crustacea: Decapoda ). In: Crosnier,

on Dasella herdmaniae (Lebour) ( Decapoda , A.(ed.), Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM, Natantia). Crustaceana, 40(1), 50–56. vol. 9. Mém. Mus . natl. hist. nat., (A) Zoologie, Bruce, A.J. (1981b) Pontoniine Shrimps from the 152, 221–279.

Great Astrolabe Reef, Fiji. Pac. Sci., 34(4), Bruce, A.J. (1991b) Crustacea Decapoda : Further 389–400. deep-sea palaemonoid shrimps from New Bruce, A.J. (1981c) Pontoniine shrimps of Heron Caledonian waters. In: Crosnier, A. (ed.), Island. Atoll. Res. Bull., 245, 1–33. Résultats des Campagnes MUSORSTOM, vol.

Bruce, A.J. (1982) The pontoniine shrimp fauna 9. Mém. Mus . natl. hist. nat., (A) Zoologie, 152,

of Hong Kong. In: Morton B & Tseng CK (eds.) 299–411.

The marine flora and fauna of Hong Kong and Bruce, A.J. (1993) Some coral reef pontoniine southern China. Volume I, Introduction and shrimps from Vietnam. Asian Mar.Biol., 10, 55–75.

taxonomy. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Bruce, A.J. (1995) A synopsis of the Indo-West Kong, pp. 233–284. Pacific genera of the Pontoniinae ( Crustacea, Bruce, A.J. (1983a). Additions to the marine fauna Decapoda , Palaemonidae ). Koeltz Scientific

of the Northern Territory. 1. Decapod Crustacea: Books, Königstein.

Caridea and Stenopodidaea. The Beagle, 1 (5), Bruce, A.J. (1996) Crustacea Decapoda : 41–49. Palaemonoid shrimps from the Indo-West Bruce, A.J. (1983b) Expédition Rumphius II (1975) Pacific region mainly from New Caledonia.

Crustacés parasites, commensauz, etc. (Th. In: Crosnier, A. (ed.) Résultats des Campagnes Monod éd.) IX. Crustacés Décapodes (1ere MUSORSTOM, 15. Mém. Mus . natl. hist. nat., (A) partie: Natantia Pontoniinae ). Bull. Mus . natl. Zoologie, 168, 197–267.

hist. nat., (4) 5, section A (3), 871–902. Bruce, A.J. (2000) Biological observations on the Bruce, A.J. (1983c) The pontoniine shrimp fauna of commensal shrimp Paranchistus armatus Australia. Rec. Aust. Mus ., 18, 195–218. (H. Milne Edwards) ( Crustacea: Decapoda : Bruce, A.J. (1983d) A second species of the Pontoniinae ). The Beagle, 16, 91–96.

pontoniine shrimp genus Dasella Lebour, Bruce, A.J. (2003a) Further information on two D. ansoni sp. nov., from the Arafura Sea. The pontoniine shrimps from ascidian hosts, Dasella Beagle , 1, 21–29. brucei Berggren Downloaded , from 1990 Brill and.com Pseudopontonia 06/24/2024 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

minuta (Baker, 1907) ( Crustacea: Decapoda : Macroura. Proc. Acad. Nat . Sci. Philadelphia, 6,

Palaemonidae ). Mem. Queens. Mus ., 49, 111–114. 10–28.

Bruce, A.J. (2003b) The Pontoniine shrimp Davie, P.J.F. (1998) Wild Guide to Moreton Bay:

fauna of Hong Kong and the South China Sea Wildlife and habitats of a beautiful Australian

( Crustacea: Decapoda : Palaemonidae ). In: coast – Noosa to the Tweed. Queensland

Morton, B. & Tseng, C.K. (eds.) Perspectives Museum: South Brisbane, 408 pp. [not

on Marine Environment Change in Hong Kong accessed].

and Southern China, 1977–2001: 209–257. Hong Davie, P.J.F. (2002) Crustacea: Malacostraca –

Kong University Press, Hong Kong. Phullocarida, Hoplocarida, Eucarida (part 1).

Bruce, A.J. (2006) Pontoniine shrimps ( Decapoda : In: Wells, A. & Houston, W. (eds.) Zoological

Palaemonidae ) from the island of Socotra, Catalogue of Australia, Vol. 19.3A. Queensland

with descriptions of new species of Dactylonia Museum, Brisbane, Australia.

Fransen, 2002 and Periclimenoides Bruce, 1990 . Davie, P.J.F., Guinot, D. & Ng, P.K.L. (2015) Anatomy

Zootaxa, 1137, 1–36. and functional morphology of Brachyura). In

Bruce, A.J. (2010a) Pontoniine shrimps ( Crustacea: Castro, P., Davie, P., Guinot, D., Schram, F. &

Decapoda : Palaemonidae ) from the CReefs Von Vaupel Klein, C. (eds.) Treatise on Zoology

2009 Heron Island Expedition, with a review – Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Crustacea,

of the Heron Island pontoniine fauna. Zootaxa, Volume 9 Part C (2 vols). Chapter 71-2: 11–163.

2541(1), 50–68. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa. 2541.1.3. Dawydoff, C. (1952) Contribution à l’étude des

Bruce, A.J. (2010b) Allopontonia alastairi sp. nov., a invertébrés de la faune marne benthique de

second species of the genus Allopontonia Bruce, l’Indochine. Bull. biol. Fr. Belg., Suppl. 37, 1–158.

1972 ( Crustacea: Decapoda : Pontoniinae ), from de Gier, W. & Becker, C. (2020) A review of the

the Australian Northwest Shelf. Zootaxa, 2372, ecomorphology of pinnotherine pea crabs

33–36. (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae ), with an updated list

Bruce, A.J.& Coombes,K.E.(1995)The palaemonoid of symbiont-host associations. Diversity, 12, 431.

shrimp fauna ( Crustacea: Decapoda : Caridea ) de Gier, W. & Fransen, C.H.J.M. (2018) Odontonia

of the Cobourg Peninsula, Northern Territory. plurellicola sp. n. and Odontonia bagginsi

The Beagle, 12, 101–144. sp. n., two new ascidian-associated shrimp

Bruce, A.J. & Svoboda, A. (1983) Observations on from Ternate and Tidore, Indonesia, with a

some pontoniine shrimps from Aqaba, Jordan. phylogenetic reconstruction of the genus

Zool. Verh., 205, 3–44. ( Crustacea, Decapoda , Palaemonidae ). ZooKeys,

Chace, F.A. Jr & Bruce, A.J. (1993) The caridean 765, 123–160.

shrimps ( Crustacea: Decapoda ) of the de Gier, W., Groenhof, M. & Fransen, C.H.J.M.

Albatross Philippine expedition, 1907-1910, Part (2022) Coming out of your shell or crawling

6: Superfamily Palaemonoidea . Smithsonian back in: multiple interphylum host

Contrib. Zool., 543, 1–152. switching events within a clade of bivalve-

Chow, L.H., De Grave, S. & Tsang, L.M. (2021) and ascidian-associated shrimps ( Caridea :

Evolution of protective symbiosis in Palaemonidae ). Contrib. Zool., 91, 166–198. doi:

palaemonid shrimps ( Decapoda : Caridea ) with 10.1163/18759866-bja10030.

emphases on host spectrum and morphological De Grave, S. (1999) Pontoniinae ( Crustacea:

adaptations. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 162, 107201. Decapoda : Palaemonidae ) associated with

Dana, J.D. (1852a) Conspectus crustaceorum, etc. bivalve molluscs from Hansa Bay , Papua New

Conspectus of the Crustacea of the exploring Guinea. Bull. Inst. r. sci . nat. Belg., Biologie, 69,

expedition under Capt. C. Wilkes, U.S. N. 125–141Downloaded. from Brill.com 06/24/2024 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 /

De Grave, S. (2001) On the taxonomic status of Fankboner, P. V. (1972) On the association between Marygrande mirabilis Pesta, 1911 ( Crustacea: the pontonid shrimp Anchistus meirsi De Man Decapoda : Palaemonidae ). Ann. Nat . Hist. Mus . ( Decapoda , Palaemonidae ) and giant clams Wien, 103B, 129–134. ( Bivalvia, Tridacnidae ). Wasmann. J. Biol.,

De Grave, S. (2007) Notes on some shrimp species 30(1/2), 35–42.

( Decapoda : Caridea ) from the Persian Gulf. Farris, J.S. (1970) Methods for computing Wagner

Ann. Nat . Hist. Mus . Wien, 108B, 145–152. Trees. Syst. Zool., 19, 83–92.

De Grave, S. & Ashelby, C.W. (2011) Notes on some Fitch, W.M. (1971) Toward defining the course of shrimp species ( Decapoda : Caridea ) from evolution: Minimal change for a specific tree Qatar, with an annotated checklist of marine topology. Syst. Zool., 28, 375–379.

caridean species known from the Persian Gulf. Forskål, P. (1775) Descriptiones Animalium, Avium ,

Mar. Biodivers. Rec., 4, e20. Amphibiorum, Piscium, Insectorum, Vermium;

De Grave, S. & Fransen, C.H.J.M. (2011) quae in Itinere Orientali Observavit Petrus Carideorum catalogus: the recent species Forskål. Post Mortem Auctoris editit Carsten

of the dendrobranchiate, stenopodidean, Niebuhr. Adjuncta est materia Medica Kahirina.

procarididean and caridean shrimps ( Crustacea: Mölleri, Hafniae, 19 + xxxiv + 164 pp.

Decapoda ). Zool. Meded., 85, 195–589. Fransen, C.H.J.M. (1994a) Shrimps and Molluscs./

De Grave, S., Struck, U. & Johnson, M.L. (2021) Garnalen en Weekdieren. Vita Marina, 42 (4), Preliminary study into the trophic position of 105–113.

symbiotic palaemonid shrimps ( Decapoda, Fransen, C.H.J.M. (1994b) Marine palaemonoid Palaemonidae ) using stable isotopes. shrimps of the Netherlands Seychelles Crustaceana, 94, 1145–1153. Expedition 1992-1993. Zool. Verh., 297, 85–152.

De Man, J.G. (1888) Report on the podophthalmous Fransen, C.H.J.M. (2002) Taxonomy, phylogeny, Crustacea of the Mergui Archipelago, collected historical biogeography, and historical ecology

for the Trustees of the Indian Museum, Calcutta, of the genus Pontonia ( Crustacea: Decapoda :

by Dr. John Anderson F. R.S., Superintendent of Caridea : Palaemonidae ). Zool. Verh., 336, 1–433.

the museum. J. Linn. Soc. (Zoology), 22, 1–305. Fransen, C.H.J.M. (2006) On Pontoniinae Devaney, D.M. & Bruce, A.J. (1987) Crustacea ( Crustacea, Decapoda , Palaemonidae ) collected Decapoda (Penaeidea, Stenopodidea, Caridea , from ascidians. Zoosystema, 28, 713–746.

and Palinura) of Enewetak Atoll. In: Devaney, Fransen, C.H.J.M. & Reijnen, B. T. (2012) A second

D.M, Reese, E.S., Burch, B.L & Helfrich P. (eds.) discovery of Lacertopontonia chadi Marin, 2011

The Natural History of Enewetak Atoll, Volume ( Crustacea: Decapoda : Palaemonidae ), with

I, The Ecosystem: Environments, Biotas, remarks on its systematic position. Zootaxa,

and Processes; Volume II, Biogeography and 3437, 43–50.

Systematics: 221–233. Fransen, C.H.J.M. & Van der Meij, S.E. T.

Dobson, N.C., De Grave, S. & Johnson, M.L. (2010) First record of a pontoniine shrimp (2014) Linking eye design with host symbiont ( Caridea , Palaemonidae ) in association with relationships in pontoniine shrimps ( Crustacea, a boring bivalve of the genus Splengeria Decapoda , Palaemonidae ). PLoS one, 9, e99505. ( Bivalvia, Euheterodonta, Gastrochaenidae ).

Dobson, N.C., Johnson, M.L. & De Grave, S. Crustaceana, 83, 1391–1400.

Natantia, Pontoniinae ). Crustaceana, 29(3), Lobsters from Japan (149). Family Palaemonidae ,

252–254. Subfamily Pontoniinae – Commensalism of

Fujino, T. & Miyake, S. (1967) Two species of Japanese species and Family Hymenoceridae

pontoniid prawns commensal with bivalves – Genera Hymenocera and Phyllognathia ].

( Crustacea, Decapoda , Palaemonidae ). Aquabiology, 166; 28(5), 509–519.

Publications of the Seto Marine Biological Hedley, C. (1924) A revision of the Australian

Laboratory, 15(4), 291–296. Pinnidae . Res. Aust. Mus ., 14(3), 141–153, plates

Gan, Z.B., Li, X.Z., Chan, T.-Y., Chu, K.H. & Kou, xix–xxi.

Q. (2015) Phylogeny of Indo-West Pacific Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1967) Etude de l’association

pontoniine shrimps ( Crustacea: Decapoda : des crevettes Pontoniinae avec les mollusques

Caridea ) based on multilocus analysis. J. Zool. Pinnidae de Madagascar. Rec. Trav. St. Mar.

Syst. Evol. Res., 53, 282–290. Endoume, Marseille, Bull., Fasc. hors série

Ghory, F.S. & Kazmi, Q.B. (2018) Morphological suppl., 6, 153–166.

study of the zoeal stage of Anchistus Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1971) Étude des crevettes

custos (Forsskål, 1775) ( Crustacea: caridea: Pontoniinae ( Palaemonidae ) associées aux

palaemonidae: pontoniinae ) reared under mollusques Pinnidae a Tulear ( Madagascar). I.

laboratory conditions and note on parental Taille. Tethys, suppl. 1, 193–214.

mother identity. Int. J. Fauna Biol., 5, 23–26. Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1972a) Étude des crevettes

Hale, H.M. (1927) The Crustacea of South Australia, Pontoniinae ( Palaemonidae ) associées aux

vol. 1, pp. 1–201. Handbooks of the Flora and mollusques Pinnidae a Tuléar ( Madagascar). 2.

Fauna of South Australia, Issued by the British Alimentation. Tethys, suppl. 3, 287–295.

Science Guild (South Australian Branch). Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1972b) Étude des crevettes

Published by Favour of the Honorable the Pontoniinae ( Palaemonidae ) associées aux

Premier, Adelaide. [Published in parts: part I, mollusques Pinnidae a Tuléar ( Madagascar).

pp. 1–201, 13 August 1927; part II, pp. 202–380, Thèse. pp. 212. [Unpublished thesis, l’université

30 August 1929]. d’Aix-Marseille ( France) ].

Hayashi, K.-I. (2002) θψĕエĉfiの分fiとƚ Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1973a) Étude des crevettes

ŝ (123) テ†ガエĉ"-カクレエĉ亜"--ス Pontoniinae ( Palaemonidae ) associées aux

ベスベカクレエĉ属 [Prawns, Shrimps and mollusques Pinnidae a Tuléar ( Madagascar). 3.

Lobsters from Japan (131). Family Palaemonidae, Morphologie externe et morphologie des pièces

Subfamily Pontoniinae – Genus Anchistus ]. buccales. Tethys, suppl. 5, 95–116.

Aquabiology, 140; 24(3), 220–225. Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1973b) Mánifestation d’un

Hayashi, K.-I. (2005) θψĕエĉfiの分fiと comportement territorial chez les crevettes

ƚŝ (123) テ†ガエĉ"-カクレエĉ亜 Pontoniinae associées aux mollusques Pinnidae

"--カイカクレエĉ属- キネ†シヤドリ à Tuléar ( Madagascar). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 13,

エĉ属- キサンゴカクレエĉ属 [Prawns, 63–71.

Shrimps and Lobsters from Japan (131). Family Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1974a) Étude des crevettes

Palaemonidae , Subfamily Pontoniinae – Genera Pontoniinae ( Palaemonidae ) associées aux

Paranchistus , Periclimenoides , and Pontonides ]. mollusques Pinnidae a Tuléar ( Madagascar). 4.

Aquabiology, 160; 27(5), 515–521. Influence de divers agents stimulants sur leur

Hayashi, K.-I. (2006) θψĕエĉfiの分fiとƚ comportement. Attraction biochimique. Tethys,

ŝ (149) テ†ガエĉ"-カクレエĉ亜"--共 suppl. 5(2-3), 367–382.

ƚ関係 7リソΪエĉ"-7リソΪエĉ Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1974b) Étude des crevettes

属- ŀゲツノメエĉ属 [Prawns, Shrimps and Pontoniinae Downloaded ( Palaemonidae from Brill.com) 06associées /24/2024 12:38 aux:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

mollusques Pinnidae a Tuléar ( Madagascar). Crustacea, order Decapoda , supersection

5. L’infestation dans les conditions naturelles. Natantia) with keys for their determination.

Tethys, suppl. 5(2–3), 383–402. Zool. Verh., 26, 1–157.

Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1974c) Étude des crevettes Holthuis, L.B. (1986) Some pontoniinae ( Crustacea:

Pontoniinae ( Palaemonidae ) associées aux Decapoda : Palaemonidae ) from southern

mollusques Pinnidae a Tuléar ( Madagascar). Oman. Zool. Meded., 60, 263–272.

6. Comportement sexuel. Tethys, suppl. 5(2-3), Holthuis, L.B. (1993) The recent genera of

403–407. the caridean and stenopodidean shrimps

Hipeau-Jacquotte, R. (1974d) Étude des crevettes ( Crustacea: Decapoda ): with an appendix on

Pontoniinae ( Palaemonidae ) associées aux the order Amphionidacea : 1–328. Fransen,

mollusques Pinnidae a Tuléar ( Madagascar). C.H.J.M. & Achterberg, C. (eds.) Brill, Leiden,

Archs Zool. Exp. Gen., 115, 359–386. the Netherlands.

Hoeksema, B.W. (2004) Marine biodiversity of Horká, I., De Grave, S., Fransen, C.H.J.M., Petrusek,

the coastal area of the Berau region, East A. & Ďuriš, Z. (2016) Multiple host switching

Kalimantan, Indonesia. Progress report East events shape the evolution of symbiotic

Kalimantan Program, pilot phase (October palaemonid shrimps ( Crustacea: Decapoda ).

2003), Naturalis, Leiden. Sci. Rep., 6, 26486. doi: 10.1038/srep26486.

Hoeksema, B.W. & Tuti, Y. (2001) Marine Hosie, A.M., Sampey, A., Davie, P.J.F. & Jones,

biodiversity of Lombok Strait, Bali: preliminary D.S. (2015) Kimberley marine biota. Historical

research report. NNM Naturalis, Leiden. data: crustaceans. Rec. West. Aust. Mus .,

Hoeksema, B.W. & Van der Meij, S.E. T. (eds.) (2008) Supplement 84, 247–285. doi: 10.18195/

Cryptic marine biota of the Raja Ampat island issn.0313-122x.84.2015.247-285.

group: Preliminary results of the Raja Ampat Idris, M.H., Awang, M.A., Kamal, A.A., Hamli,

Expedition (2007), Ekspedisi Widya Nusantara H., Al-Asif, A., Pursetyo, K. T. Masithah, E.D.

(E-Win) of the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (2022) Symbiotically snapper shrimp Anchistus

( LIPI). National Museum of Natural History custoides Bruce,1977 ( Decapoda : Palaemonidae )

Naturalis, Leiden, 73 pp. inhabiting the mantle cavity of the Pen shell

Hoeksema, B.W. & Van der Meij, S.E. T. (2010) ( Bivalvia: Pinnidae ). J. Sustain. Sci. Manag., 17

Crossing marine lines at Ternate: capacity (10), 136–148. doi: 10.46754/jssm.2022.10.010.

building of junior scientists in Indonesia for Jacquotte, R. (1963) Habitat electif des Pontoniinae

marine biodiversity assessments. Naturalis, commensales des Pinnidae de Tuléar

Leiden. ( Madagascar). Rec. Trav. St. Mar. Endoume,

Hogarth, P.J. (1989) The marine Crustacea of Marseille, Bull., 29(44), 59–62.

Dhofar, southern Oman. J. Oman Sci., 10, 99–124. Jensen, G.C. (1995) Pacific coast crabs and

Holthuis, L.B. (1952) The Decapoda of the Siboga shrimps. Sea Challengers, Monterey, California

Expedition. Part XI. The Palaemonidae ( USA).

collected by the Siboga and Snellius Expeditions Johnson, D.S. (1961) A synopsis of the Decapoda

with remarks on other species II. Subfamily Caridea and Stenopodidea of Singapore with

Pontoniinae . Siboga Expeditie, 39a10, 1–253. notes on their distribution and a key to the

Holthuis, L.B. (1953) Enumeration of the decapod genera of Caridea occurring in Malayan waters.

and stomatopod Crustacea from Pacific coral Bull. Nat . Mus ., State of Singapore, 30, 44–79.

islands. Atoll Res. Bull., 24, 1–66. Johnson, D.S. (1979) Prawns of the Malacca Straits

Holthuis, L.B. (1955) The recent genera of the and Singapore waters. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India,

caridean and stenopodidean shrimps (class 18 [for 1976 Downloaded], 1–54. from Brill.com 06/24/2024 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Johnson, D.S. & Liang, M. (1966) On the biology of the Watchman prawn, Anchistus custos ( Crustacea; Decapoda ; Palaemonidae ), and Indo-West Pacific commensal of the bivalve Pinna . J. Zool. Lond., 150, 433–455.

Karplus, I., Sagi, A., Khalaila, I. & Barki, A. (2003) The soft red patch of the Australian freshwater crayfish ( Cherax quadricarinatus (von Martens)) : a review and prospects for future research. J. Zool., Lond., 259, 375–379.

Kassem, K., Hoeksema, B.W. & Affendi, Y.A. (eds.) (2012) Semporna Marine Ecological Expedition. WWF-Malaysia, NCB Naturalis, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu Malaysia, v + 262 pp.

Kemp, S. (1922) Notes on Crustacea Decapoda in the Indian Museum, XV. Pontoniinae . Rec. Indian Mus ., 24, 113–288.

Kemp, S. (1925) Notes on Crustacea Decapoda in the Indian Museum. XVII On various Caridea . Rec. Indian Mus ., 27, 249–342.

Kennedy, H., Richardson, C.A., Duarte, C.M. & Kennedy, D.P. (2001) Diet and association of Pontonia pinnophylax occurring in Pinna nobilis : insights from stable isotope analysis. J. Mar. Biolog. Assoc. UK, 81, 177–178.

Kou, Q., Li, X.Z., Chan, T.Y. & Chu, K.H. (2015) Divergent evolutionary pathways and host shifts among the commensal pontoniine shrimps: a preliminary analysis based on selected Indo-Pacific species. Org. Divers. Evol., 15, 369–377.

Kozlov, A.M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B. & Stamatakis, A.(2019) RAxML-NG:a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics, 35, 4453–4455.

Kubo, I. (1940) Studies on Japanese palaemonoid shrimps. II. Pontoniinae . J. Imp. Fish. Inst. Tokyo , 34, 31–75.

Kubo, I. (1949) On a new species of the genus Anchistus . Bull. Biogeo. Soc. Japan, 14, 26–29.

Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol., 35, 1547–1549.

Lanchester, W.F. (1902) On the Crustacea collected during the “Skeat” Expedition to the Malay Peninsula, together with a note on the genus Actaeopsis . Part I.- Brachyura, Stomatopoda, and Macrura. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 1901(3), 534–574, pls. 33–34.

Land, J. van der (ed.) (1994) Oceanic Reefs of the Seychelles. In: Netherlands Indian Ocean Programme, Cruise Reports. Vol. 2. Nationaal Natuurhistorische Museum, Leiden, pp. 1–192.

Lebour, M. V. (1938) Decapod Crustacea associated with the ascidian Herdmania . Proc. Zool. Soc., 108B, 649–653.

Lebour, M. V. (1945) Alteration in the name Dasia as a decapod genus. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 114, 279.

Li, X. (2000) Catalog of the genera and species of Pontoniinae Kingsley, 1878 . Xueyuan Press, Beijing, iv + 319 pp .

Li, X. (2001) Some pontoniine shrimps ( Crustacea: Caridea ) from Hainan Island, South China Sea. In: Matsuura, K. (ed.) Marine Fauna of the Shallow Waters around Hainan Island, South China Sea. Nat . Sci. Mus . Mon., 21, 75–86.

Li, X. (2004) The pontoniine shrimps ( Crustacea: Decapoda : Palaemonidae ) from Anambas and Natuna Islands, Indonesia, collected by Anambas Expedition, 2002. Raffles Bull. Zool., suppl. 11, 67–72.

Li, X. (2008a). Palaemonid shrimps ( Crustacea: Decapoda : Caridea ) from Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. In: Davie, P.J.F. & Phillips, J.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Marine Biological Workshop, The Marine Fauna and Flora of Moreton Bay, Queensland. Mem. Queens. Mus ., Nature, 54(1), 233–267.

Li, X. (2008b). Report on some species of Palaemonidae ( Crustacea, Decapoda ) from French Polynesia. Zoosystema, 30(1), 203–252.

Li, X. (2009) Sandimenes nov. gen. for Periclimenes Matsumasa, M., Kikuchi, S., Takeda, S. , hirsutus Bruce, 1971 ( Decapoda : Caridea : Poovachiranon, S., Yong, H.-S. & Murai, M.

Pontoniinae ). Crustaceana, 82, 881–896. (2001) Blood osmoregulation and ultrastructure

Li, X. & Bruce, A.J. (2006) Further Indo-West of the gas windows (‘tympana’) of intertidal Pacific palaemonoid shrimps ( Crustacea: ocypodid crabs: Dotilla vs. Scopimera . Benthos Decapoda : Palaemonoidea ), principally from Res., 56, 47–55.

the New Caledonian region. J. Nat . Hist., 40(11- McNeill, F.A. (1953) Carcinological Notes No. 2. Rec.

12), 611–738. Aust. Mus ., 23, 89–96.

Li, X. & Liu, J.Y. (2002) Report on pontoniine McNeill, F. A. (1968) Crustacea, Decapoda and shrimps ( Crustacea: Decapoda ) collected Stomatopoda. Great Barrier Reef Expedition,

by joint Chinese-German marine biology 1928-29, Sci. Rep., 7(1), 1–98.

expeditions to Hainan Island, South China Sea. Miers, A.J. (1884) Crustacea. Part I. The collections I. Anchistus , Conchodytes , Coralliocaris . Chin. J. from Melanesia. Crustacea. In: Report on the Oceanol. Limnol., 20(4), 371–377. Zoological Collections made in the Indo-Pacific

Li, X., Bruce, A.J. & Manning, R.B. (2004) Some Ocean during the Voyage of H.M.S. ‘Alert’ 1881- palaemonid shrimps ( Crustacea: Decapoda ) 82. Report on the Zoological Collections made

from northern South China Sea, with in the Indo-Pacific Ocean during the Voyage of descriptions of two new species. Raffles Bull. H.M.S. ‘Alert’ 1881-82. British Museum of Natural

Zool., 52, 513–553. History, London, 178–322, plates 18–35.

Li, X., Liu, R.Y., Liang, X.Q. & Chen, G.X. (2007) Miller, M.A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. (2010) Crustacea Decapoda Palaemonidae . Fauna Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for Sinica, Invertebrata, 44, 1–381. inference of large phylogenetic trees. In:

Liu, H. (2020) Sequence and phylogenetic Proceedings of the Gateway Computing analysis of the mitochondrial genome for Environments Workshop ( GCE), 14 Nov. 2010 ,

a giant clam commensal shrimp Anchistus New Orleans, LA, 1–8.

australis ( Decapoda : Caridea : Palaemonidae ). Milne Edwards, H. (1834-1840) Histoire Naturelle Mitochondrial dna, Part B: Resour., 5(1), 312–313. des Crustacés, Comprenant l´Anatomie, la

doi: 10.1080/23802359.2019.1700839. Physiologie et la Classification de ces Animaux.

Lovell, J.M., Findlay, M.M., Moate, R.M. & Yan, Encyclopédique Roret, Paris. Vol. III, 638 pp.,

H.Y. (2005) The hearing abilities of the prawn plates 1–42.

Palaemon serratus . Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part Miyake, S., (1972) Decapoda . In: Aquatic Animals.

A Mol. Integr. Physiol., 140, 89e 100. Genshoku gakushu waido zu kan [= Picture Lucas, H. (1851) Histoire naturelle des Crustacés, Encyclopedia. Coloured Illustrations of Wide

des Arachnides et des Myriapodes; précédée Learning]. Volume 6, 62–99.

de l’Histoire naturelles des Annélides, par M. le Miyake, S. (1982) Japanese crustacean decapods Comte de Castelnau: 1–601. Paris. and stomatopods in color, volume 1: Macrura, Marin, I.N. & Savinkin, O. V. (2007) Further records Anomura and Stomatopoda: vii + 261 pp.

and preliminary list of pontoniine ( Caridea : Hoikusha Publishing Co., Osaka. [ In Japanese ].

Palaemonidae : Pontoniinae ) and hymenocerid Miyake, S. & Fujino, T. (1968) Pontoniid shrimps ( Caridea : Hymenoceridae ) shrimps from from the Palau Islands ( Crustacea, Decapoda, Nhatrang Bay. In : Britayev, T. & Pavlov, D. (eds.) Palaemonidae ). J. Fac. Agri., Kyushu University, Benthic fauna of the Bay of Nhatrang, Southern 14, 399–431.

Vietnam. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. Monod, T. (1972) Sur quatre crevettes du Pacifique

278 pp. Sud. Cah. Downloaded Pac., 16, 7– from 29. Brill.com 06/24/2024 12:38:05 AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Monod, T. (1976 a) Expédition Rumphius II (1975) Opinion 470 (1957) Addition to the “Official List Crustacés parasites, commensaux, etc. (Th. of Generic Names in Zoology” of the names Monod et R. Serène, éd). I. Introduction. Bull. on one hundred and two genera of Caridea Mus. natl. hist. nat., Zoologie, 273 (= ser. 3, no. (Class Crustacea, Order Decapoda) and use 391), 833–843. of the Plenary Powers for various purposes in Monod, T. (1976b) Sur quelques Natantia (Crust, connection therewith. Opin. Decl. iczn, 16(9), décapodes) de Nouméa (Nouvelle Calédonie). 129–202.

Cah. Pac., 19, 7–28. Ortmann, A. (1894) Zoologische Forshungreisen in Müller, F. (1887) Zur Crustaceenfauna von Australien und dem Malayischen Archipel mit Trincomali. Verh. Naturforsch. Ges. Basel, 8(2), Unterstützung des Herrn Dr. Paul von Ritter 470 –485, pls. IV–V. ausgefürht in den Jahrn 1891–1893. Crustaceen. Müller H.G. (1993) Catalogue of the Indo-Pacific Denkschr. Mediz.-Naturw. Ges. Jena, 8, 3–80. pontoniine shrimps: i-ii, 1–159, 1 fig. Wetzlar, Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. (2019) ape 5.0: an Germany. environment for modern phylogenetics Neo, M.L., Lee, B.Y., Vicentuan, K. & Todd, P.A. and evolutionary analyses in R (v. 5.5). (2015) Dichromatism in the commensal shrimp Bioinformatics, 35, 526–528.

Anchistus miersi (De Man, 1888). Mar. Biodivers., Pearson (1905) Report on the Macrura collected 45, 877–878. doi: 10.1007/s12526-014-0303-7. by Professor Herdman, at Ceylon, in 1902. Rep. Neumann, J.S., Daselle, R., Narechania, A., Ceylon Pearl Oyster Fisheries - 1905. Supp. Rep., Schierwater,B.&Tessler,M.(2021)Morphological XXIV, 65–92.

characters can strongly influence early animal Penell, M.W., Eastman, J.M., Slater, G.J., Brown, relationships inferred from phylogenomic data J.W., Uyeda, J.C., FitzJohn, R.G., Alfaro, M.E. & sets. Syst. Biol., 70, 360–375. Harmon, L.J. (2014) Geiger v2.0: an expanded Ng, P.K.L., Murphy, D.H., Lim, K.K.P., Chou, L.M. suite of methods for fitting macroevolutionary

& Lane, D.J.W. (1995) A guide to the threatened models to phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics, animals of Singapore: 160 pp. Singapore Science 30, 2216–2218.

Centre, Singapore. Pérez, C. (1920) Le complexe éthologique du Nobili, G. (1899) Contribuzioni alla conoscenza spondyle sus les bancs perliers du Golfe della fauna carcinologica della Papuasia, delle Persique. C. R. Seacnes Soc. Biol., 83, 1027–1029. Molluche e dell’ Australia. Ann. Mus. Civ. Stor. Pesta, O. (1911) Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Nat. Genova, series 2(20(40)), 230–282. Pontoniiden. Marygrande mirabilis nov. gen. Nobili, G. (1906a) Mission J. Bonnier et Ch. Pérez nov. spec. Zool. Anz., 38, 571–575.

(Golfe Persique 1901). Crustacés Décapodes et Pesta, O. (1913) VI. Crustacea II. Teil. Decapoda Stomatopodes. Bull. biol. Fr. Belg., 40, 13–159. (mit Ausschluss der Brachyura) und Nobili, G. (1906b) Faune carcinologique de la mer Stomatopoda aus Samoa. In: K. Rechinger (ed.) rouge. Décapodes et Stomatopodes. Ann. Nat. Botanische und Zoologische Ergebnisse einer Sci., (9)4, 1–347. wissenschaftlichen Forschungsreise nach den Nobili, G. (1907) Ricerche sui Crostacei della Samoa-Inseln, dem Neuguinea-Archipel und Polinesia. Decapodi, Stomatopodi, Anisopodi den Salomoninseln von März bis Dezember

e Isopodi. Mem. Real. Ac. Sci. Torino, (2)57, 1905. Denkschr. Math-Naturw. Kl. Kaiserl. Ak. 351 –430. Wiss., 89, 673–682.

Ooishi, S. (1964) Results of Amami Expedition. No. Poupin, J. (1998) Crustacea Decapoda and 3. Invertebrates. Rep. Fac. Fish., Pref. Uni. Mie, 5, Stomatopoda of French Polynesia. Atoll Res. 189– 215. Bull., 451 Downloaded, 1–62. from Brill.com 06/24/2024 12:38:05AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Poupin,J. & Juncker,M. (2010) A guide to the decapod crustaceans of the South Pacific. Published by CRISP and SPC, Noumea, New Caledonia, 320 pp., 366 photographs. Downloadable at www. crisponline.net & www.oeil.nc

Pretus, J.L. & Stock, J.H. (1990) A new hyporheic Bogidiella (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from Mallorca. Endins, 16, 47–51.

Radhakrishnan, E.V., Deshmukh, V.D., Maheswarudu, G., Josileen, J., Philipose, K.K., Sarada, P.T., Pillai, S.L., Saleela, K.N., Thirumilu, P., Sridhara, B., Muniyappa, Y., Vaidya, N.G., Johny, R.D., Verma, J., Unnikrishnan, C.K., Ramachandran, N.P., Vairamani, A., Palanichamy, A.P., Radhakrishnan, M. & Raju, B. (2012) Prawn fauna (Crustacea: Decapoda) of India – An annotated checklist of the Penaeoid, Sergestoid, Stenopodid and Caridean prawns. J. Mar. Asoc. India, 54 (1), 50–72.

Rafinesque, C. S. (1815) Analyse de la Nature ou Tableau de l’Univers et des corps organisés: 1 –224. (Palermo).

Rambaut, A. (2009) FigTree version 1.4 .2. Available at: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk (Accessed: 14th November 2020).

Ramírez, M. (2014) The morphology and phylogeny of dionychan spiders (Aranea:Araneomorphae). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat., 390, 1–374.

Rathbun M.A. (1914) Stalked-eyed crustaceans collected from the Monto Bello Islands. Proc. Zool. Soc., London, 1914(3), 653–664.

Rauch, C., Hoeksema, B.W., Hermanto, B. & Fransen, C.H.J.M. (2019) Shrimps of the genus Periclimenes (Crustacea, Decapoda, Palaemonidae) associated with mushroom corals (Scleractinia, Fungiidae): linking DNA barcodes to morphology. Contrib. Zool., 88, 201–235.

Revell, L.J. (2012) phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol., 3, 217–223. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x.

Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572–1574.

Rosewater, J. (1961) The family Pinnidae in the Indo-Pacific. Indo-Pac. Moll., 1 (4), 175–226.

Rosewater, J. (1965) The family Tridacnidae in the Indo-Pacific. Indo-Pac. Moll., 1 (6), 347–393.

Salis, P., Roux, N., Soulat, O., Lecchini, D., Laudet, V. & Frédérich, B. (2018) Ontogenetic and phylogenetic simplification during white stripe evolution in clownfishes. bmc Biol., 16, 1–14. doi: 10.1186/s12915-018-0559-7.

Samuel, V.D., Sreeraj, C.R., Krishnan, P., Parthiban, C., Sekar, V., Chamundeeswari, K., Immanuel, T., Shesdev, P., Purvaja, R. & Ramesh, R. (2016) An updated checklist of shrimps on the Indian coast. J.Threat. Tax., 8, 8977–8988.

Sayers, E.W., Cavanaugh, M., Clark, K., Ostell, J., Pruitt, K.D. & Karsch-Mizrachi, I. (2020) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res., 48, D84–D86.

Seurat, L.G. (1934) La faune et le peuplement de la Polynésie française. In: P. Lechevalier & fils (eds), Contribution à l’étude du Peuplenient zoologique et botanique dce îles du Pacifiquc. Soc. Biogeogr., 4, 41–74.

Sharp, B. (1893) Catalogue of the crustaceans in the Museum of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1893, 104–127.

Strack, H.L. (1993) Results of the Rumphius Biohistorical Expedition to Ambon (1990). Part 1. General account and list of stations. Zool. Verh., 289, 3–72.

Strauss, J. & Lakes-Harlan, R. (2014) Evolutionary and phylogenetic origins of tympanal hearing organs in insects. In: Hedwig, B. (ed.) Insect hearing and acoustic communication. Animal signals and communication 1, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40462-7_2.

Suzuki, H. (1971) On some commensal shrimps found in the western region of Sagami Bay. Res. Crustacea, 4-5, 92–119.

Swofford, D.L. (2003) Paup*. Phylogenetic Analysis Museum, Sydney, 1980. Aust. Mus. Mem., 18, Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). 141–153.

Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Van der Meij, S.E.T. (2014) Host species, range Talavera, G. & Castresana, J. (2007) Improvement extensions, and an observation of the mating

of phylogenies after removing divergent and system of the Atlantic shallow-water gall crabs ambiguously aligned blocks from protein (Decapoda: Cryptochiridae). Bull. Mar. Sci., 90, sequence alignments. Syst. Biol., 56, 564–577. 1001–1010. doi: 5343/bms.2014.1017.

Tattersall, W.M. (1921) Report on the Stomatopoda Vehof, J., Van der Meij, S.E.T., Tuerkay, M. & Becker, and macrurous Decapoda collected by Mr. Cyril C. (2016) Female reproductive morphology Crossland in the Sudanese Red Sea. J. Linn. Soc., of coral-inhabiting gall crabs (Crustacea: London, 34, 345–398. Decapoda: Brachyura: Cryptochiridae). Atca Thomassin, B. (1972) Les biotopes de sables Zool., 97, 117–126.

coralliens derivant des appareils recifaux Vine, P. (1986) Red Sea Invertebrates: 224 pp. Immel

de la region de Tulear) SW de Madagascar). Publishing, London, UK.

In: Mukundan C. & Gopindha Pillai C.S. Vonk, R. & Schram, F. R. (2003) Ingolfiellidea (eds.) Proceedings of the First International (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Amphipoda): a Symposium on Corals and Coral Reefs, Marine phylogenetic and biogeographic analysis.

Biological Association of India, Mandapam Contrib. Zool., 72, 39–72.

Camp, India: 291–313. Watabe & Tomida (1977) Report on the marine Thomassin, B. (1974) Soft bottom carcionological biological expeditions to the Yap Islands of fauna sensu lato in Tulear coral reef complexex Micronesia. 46 [Toba Aquarium, Mie Prefectural (SW Madagascar): distribution, roles played Museum and Asahi Shinbun Publishing

in tropic food chain and in bottom deposits. Company (1977). Report on the marine In: Cameron, A.M., Cambell, B. M, Cribb, A.B., biological expeditions to the Yap Islands of Endean, R., Jell, J.S., Jones, O.A., Mather, P. & Micronesia, 1974. 176 pp. (YINS)] [not accessed].

Talbot F.H. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second Whitelegge, T. (1897) The Crustacea of Funafuti. VI.

International Coral Reef Symposium. Vol. 1: The Crustacea. Mem. Aust. Mus ., 3(1), 127–154.

297–320. The Great Barrier Reef Committee, Xia, X. (2009) Assessing substitution saturation Brisbane, Australia. with DAMBE. In: P. Lemey, M. Salemi & A.-M.

Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. Vandamme (eds.) The Phylogenetic Handbook: (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity A Practical Approach to Phylogenetic Analysis

of progressive multiple sequence alignment and HypothesisTesting, pp. 615–630.Cambridge through sequence weighting, position-specific University Press, Cambridge, UK.

gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Xia, X., Xie, Z., Salemi, M., Chen, L. & Wang, Y.

Acids Res., 22, 4673–4680. (2003) An index of substitution saturation and Tirmizi, N.M. & Kazmi, Q.B. (1982) Report on its application. Molecular Phylogenetics and Anchistus custos (Decapoda: Caridea) (Forskal, Evolution, 26, 1–7.

1775) in Pakistan Waters (Arabian Sea). Pakistan Yack, J.E. (2004) The structure and function of J. Zool., 14 (1), 115–117. auditory chordotonal organs in insects. Microsc.

Vader, W. (1983) Associations between amphipods Res. Techniq., 63, 315–337.

(Crustacea: Amphipoda) and sea anemones Yamaguchi, T. & Holthuis, L.B. (2001) Kai-ka Rui (Anthozoa, Actiniaria). In: Lowry, J.K. (ed.) Siya-sin, a collection of pictures of crabs and Papers from the conference on the biology and shrimps, donated by Kurimoto Suiken to Ph. F.

evolution of Crustacea, held at the Australian von Siebold Downloaded. Calanus from,Brill spec.com. no.06 3,/1 24 –156 / 2024. 12:38:05AM via Open Access. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY 4.0 license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Yang, Z., Kumar, S. & Nei, M. (1995) A new method of inference of ancestral nucleotide and amino acid sequences. Genetics, 141, 1641–1650.

Yokoya, Y. (1936) Some rare and new species of decapod crustaceans found in the vicinity of the Misaki marine biological station. Jpn. J. Zool., 7, 129–146.

RMNH

National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis

ZMA

Universiteit van Amsterdam, Zoologisch Museum

AM

Australian Museum

CC

CSIRO Canberra Rhizobium Collection

ML

Musee de Lectoure

T

Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics

NNM

National Museum of Natural History, Naturalis

MNHN

Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle

NCB

National Culture Bank

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

V

Royal British Columbia Museum - Herbarium

USC

University of Southern California

PPPO

Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Oseanologi

WWF

Rob and Bessie Welder Wildlife Foundation

KMK

Kraevedscheskii Musei Kishineva - Museum of Regional Study

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Decapoda

Family

Palaemonidae

Genus

Tympanicheles

Loc

Tympanicheles ornatus (Holthuis, 1952)

de Gier, Werner & Fransen, Charles H. J. M. 2023
2023
Loc

Paranchistus ornatus

Holthuis 1952: 97 - 100
1952
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF