Floridotarsonemus humeophilus, MashkovK & KhaustovK & GoncharovK, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.24349/8rdx-1y0u |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BA1AB319-AABC-42EC-926E-AD44458EF587 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A47BB179-CE26-6C4A-FE0A-73EE0C8FF8AC |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Floridotarsonemus humeophilus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Floridotarsonemus humeophilus n. sp.
Zoobank: 18111E83-E675-4933-B1CC-5A4390B5BCE1
( Figs 1–5 View Figure 1 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 View Figure 4 View Figure 5 )
Female — Gnathosomal capsule ( Figs 2A, B View Figure 2 , 3A View Figure 3 ) subtriangular in shape, 1.5 times longer than wide, connected with idiosoma with membranous cuticle. Length of gnathosomal capsule 28 (28–30), width 18 (15–20). Palpcoxal setae pp () 9 (9–12) present laterally. Dorsal gnathosomal setae ch () 13 (12–14) smooth, simple. Palpi short 10 (9–10), with tiny setae
(dGE) and round inconspicuous process on distal extremity. Ventral gnathosomal setae m () 12 (10–14) smooth and pointed. Cheliceral stylets 8 (7) and their levers short. Pharynx medium, muscular, with thin walls, width of pharynx 5 (5–6) occupies 1/3 part of gnathosomal width ( Fig. 3A View Figure 3 ). Idiosomal dorsum ( Figs 1A View Figure 1 , 3C, D View Figure 3 ). Prodorsal shield expanded laterally. Stigmata small, round, located partially under prodorsal shield; trachea long, thin and narrow, without sclerotized sacks. Bothridia present, trichobothria sc 1 () clearly elongated, pilose, almost completely covered by prodorsal shield. Alveolar pits v 2 located at the same distance from both bases of setae v 1 and sc 2. All tergites with regular tiny puncta and delicate striation near posterior margin. Each tergite with smooth posterior margins. All dorsal setae smooth; setae
h weakly blunt-tipped, other setae pointed. Lengths of dorsal setae: v 1 15 (16–21), sc 2 26 (26–28), c 1 14 (12 – 15), c 2 16 (14 – 18), d 9 (9–11), e 7 (7–9), f 12 (11–13), h 6 (5–6). Distances between setae: v 1 – v 1 31 (32–33), v 2 – v 2 41 (40–42), sc 2 – sc 2 51 (46–50), c 1 – c 1 78 (76–82),
c 2 – c 2 104 (100–107), c 1 – c 2 31 (29–33), d–d 39 (36–41), e–e 70 (67–72), e–f 30 (25–31), f –f
17 (15–22), h–h 37 (33–38).
Idiosomal venter ( Figs 1B View Figure 1 , 3A, B View Figure 3 ). All ventral plates with tiny uniform puncta. Prosternal apodeme (appr) distally with small y-shaped bifurcation and nodule in middle part, not fused with sejugal apodeme (apsej). Apodemes 2 (ap2) not fused with prosternal apodeme (appr),
with two nodules: one in the middle part, other at the end. Sejugal apodeme indistinct,
continuous. All ventral setae smooth and pointed. Lateral ends of apodemes 3 (ap3) extended laterally, apodemes 3 with three nodules. Apodeme 4 (ap4) with nodules, anterior ends of apodemes not fused with poststernal apodeme (appo). Posterior ends of ap 4 reach base of setae
3 b. Tegula 6 (5–7) long, 13 (13–15) wide, with slightly convace sides. Posterior sternal plate with angular sharp process between trochanter III and IV. Length of ventral setae a:8 1(8–9),
2 a 13 (13–14), 3 a 11 (11–13), 3 b 12 (9–12), ps 8 (7–9). Width of tegula 13 (13–15), length of tegula 6 (5–7).
Legs ( Figs 4A–E View Figure 4 , 5A, B View Figure 5 , 3A, B View Figure 3 ). Chaetotaxy (including unguinal setae u′, u″ on tibiotarsus I and u″ on tarsi II and III) of leg I: Fe4–Ge4–TiTa6(2 ϕ) +10(1 ω); leg II: Fe3–Ge3–Ti4–Ta7(1 ω);
leg III: FeGe1+3–Ti4–Ta6; legIV: FeGe1+1–TiTa1+1. Length of legs: I 47 (48–53), II 48
(45–46), III 43 (41–43), IV 28 (22–24). Leg I ( Figs 4A, B View Figure 4 ). Femur with flange ( Fig. 4B View Figure 4 ).
Solenidion ω elongated, digitiform; solenidia ϕ 1 and ϕ 2 clublike and elongate; seta k 3 (3–4)
baculiform, slightly shorter that solenidion ϕ 1. Lengths of solenidia: ω 5 (5–6), ϕ 1 5 (5), ϕ 2 3
(2–3). Setae: l″, l′, and d of femur barbed and blunt-tipped; seta v″ pointed and barbed. Seta
l′ of genu barbed and blunt-tipped, other setae pointed and barbed. Setae d, pv″ of tibiotarsus smooth and pointed, seta s spiniform, eupathidia p′ (, p″, tc′, tc″) smooth and blunt-tipped, other setae pointed and barbed. Leg II ( Figs 4C–E View Figure 4 ). Solenidion ω 6 (5–6) elongated, digitiform.
Femur with distinct flange ( Fig. 4E View Figure 4 ). Tibia with characteristic sharp process. ( Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ). Seta
d of femur smooth, stout, blunt-tipped; seta l′ blunt-tipped, stout, barbed; seta v″ pointed and barbed. All setae of genu barbed and pointed. Tibia setae v″, l′, and v′ pointed and barbed;
seta d smooth and pointed. Tarsus setae tc′, tc″, pv′ pointed and barbed; seta pv″ pointed and smooth; seta pl″ spiniform and located distally from solenidion ω close to base of seta tc″ ;
seta u′ smooth, spiniform, u″ very small, pointed and smooth. Leg III ( Fig. 5A View Figure 5 ). Setae v′Fe of femorogenu smooth, blunt-tipped; seta v′Ge barbed and pointed; setae l″Ge and l′Ge smooth and pointed. All tibial setae weakly barbed and pointed. Tarsal setae tc′ and pv″ barbed and pointed; setae tc″, pv′, and u″ smooth and pointed; seta u′ smooth, blunt, stout. Leg IV. ( Fig. View Figure 5
5B). All setae smooth and pointed; measurements: v′Fe 6 (6–8), v′Ge 7 (8–10), v′Ti 11 (11–13),
tc″ 42 (43–45).
Males and juvenile stage are unknown.
Type material — Female holotype, Slide ZISP T-Tar-003, Krasnodar Krai, vicinity of the city of Krasnodar, winter wheat field, extracted from soil, 6 April 2022, coll. A.A. Goncharov. Paratypes: 8 females, same data.
Type deposition — The holotype and one paratype are deposited in ZISP (Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciense, St. Petersburg, Russia); other paratypes are deposited in the collection of the TSUMZ (Tyumen State University Museum of Zoology, Tyumen, Russia).
Etymology — The name of the species is a combination of two words, Latin humus meaning soil and Greek φίΛΟΣ meaning love and refers to the soil habitat in contrast to plant habitats of other Floridotarsonemus species.
ZISP |
Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.