Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor, 1986

Blanchard, J, Wang, H & Dilcher, D, 2016, Fruits, seeds and flowers from the Bovay and Bolden clay pits (early Eocene Tallahatta Formation, Claiborne Group), northern Mississippi, USA, Palaeontologia Electronica 19 (3), pp. 1-59 : 9-12

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.26879/579

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A21187CB-FF88-FF96-466D-FA4E2A09FB13

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor, 1986
status

 

Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor, 1986

( Figures 5 View FIGURE 5 , 6 View FIGURE 6 , 7 View FIGURE 7 )

* 1986 Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor , p. 555, figs. 1-22.

v. 2013 Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor ; Wang, Blanchard, and Dilcher, p. 15, fig. 12.

Description. Flowers ca 3–4 mm long and 2–4 mm wide (excluding filaments and pedicel) with up to 10 stamens. Filaments exserted, up to 5 mm long and often of unequal length. Anthers ca 0.75–1 mm long and 0.5 mm wide. Perianth parts usually three, triangular, ca 2 mm long, and 1 mm wide, attached to the rim of the receptacle. Receptacle ca 2 mm wide and 1 mm long. Pedicel ca 0.3 mm wide and up to 6 mm long.

Number of specimens examined. 4. UF15737- 026430, 027593, 060709.

Remarks. Flowers of Protomimosoidea buchananensis Crepet and Taylor, 1986 are common from the Warman, Puryear and Buchanan localities of the Claiborne Group in Tennessee ( Crepet, 1979; Crepet and Taylor, 1985, 1986; Wang et al., 2013). Compared with flowers from other Claiborne localities, specimens from the Bovay locality are better preserved and they are probably more mature than those described from the Warman locality. One complete flower ( Figure 5 View FIGURE 5 ) has 10 stamens, five of which have shorter filaments that are only 67% of the length of the other five stamens.

Berry (1916b, p. 322, plate 96, figures 1-5) described a similar flower from a locality 2.4 km west of Grand Junction in Fayette County, Tennessee. He suggested that this specimen, assigned to Combretanthites eocenica , is closely related to the Combretaceae rather than the Mimosoideae because of its inferior ovary. If, however, the ovary is superior within a hypanthium, Berry’s specimen could belong in Protomimosoidea . Crepet and Taylor (1986) did not include Berry’s specimen in their study of primitive mimosoid flowers. Unfortunately, we are unable to locate the specimen described by

BLANCHARD, WANG, & DILCHER: FOSSIL PLANTS FROM MISSISSIPPI

Berry (1916b) to further confirm or reject its assignment to the Combretaceae .

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF