Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv., Ess. Agrost. 1: 53, 161, 169, pl. 11, f. 2. 1812.
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.197.79499 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9F364C56-4E9A-5FF6-9C22-06BF010192CA |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv., Ess. Agrost. 1: 53, 161, 169, pl. 11, f. 2. 1812. |
status |
|
Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv., Ess. Agrost. 1: 53, 161, 169, pl. 11, f. 2. 1812. View in CoL
Basionym.
Panicum crus-galli L., Sp. Pl. 1: 56. 1753.
Type.
Herb. Burser 1: 303, sine dato (UPS).
Notes.
There has always been a great deal of confusion about the type; see, e.g., Hitchcock (1908) or Gould et al. (1972). In fact, all original material came from North America and belongs to E. muricata ; in 1753 E. crus-galli , from Eurasia, was not yet a widespread introduced species in North America. Crespo et al. (2020b) formally proposed to conserve the binomial P. crus-galli with a conserved type based on the specimen Herb. Burser I: 103 (UPS), the one previously chosen as “lectotype” by Michael (1983).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |