Aegidinus simulatus Colbyı 2009
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2019.1606953 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:09AA5C86-5138-42A7-9646-9FF2A7F46767 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3680490 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9F138799-E545-B07E-9BD6-5EDCD1F8FA1C |
|
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
|
scientific name |
Aegidinus simulatus Colbyı 2009 |
| status |
|
Aegidinus simulatus Colbyı 2009
( Figure 4 View Figure 4 (e – h))
Aegidinus simulatus Colbyı 2009: 32
Material examined
PERU. Loreto: Curaray Riverı Gaseoducto Barrettı 25 February 2008ı W. Yawarcani leg.ı two males and three females ( UNMSM). COLOMBIA. Meta: San Martínı Tocancipa Ranchı 520 mı forestı pitfallı April 2006ı J. Noriega leg.ı one male ( CEMT).
Diagnosis
Aegidinus simulatus is similar to Ae. brasiliensis ı Ae. howeae and Ae. colbyae sp. nov. in having mediobasal margins of the dorsomedial lobes of the parameres strongly sclerotisedı but can be distinguished from them by having the dorsal sides of the parameres strongly overlapping and separated by a slit ( Figure 4 View Figure 4 (f)ı arrowed).
Description of male
Body length 9.5 – 10.0 mm. Colour uniformly blackish brown. Anterior margin of frontoclypeus with a horn rounded apically ( Figure 4 View Figure 4 (e)).
Pronotum with widely rounded lateral marginsı narrower than elytraı 1.6 times wider than length. Posterior angles widely rounded. Anterior margin borderedı border narrowly interrupted mediallyı with shortı somewhat bimodal tubercle. Base of pronotum not borderedı with obsolete punctures laterally. Pronotal disc feebly excavated anteromediallyı with two gibbosities in centre. Pronotum punctate with a few large rounded punctures laterally and transversely elongated punctures anteromedially and with minuteı feebly visible punctures throughout.
Elytra almost as long as wideı widest medially and rounded apicallyı with humeral and apical humps. First elytral stria as continuous line not connected basally with undulate line from scutellum to humeral hump. Other striae marked with rows of sparse elongate punctures.
Protibia without medioapical tooth.
Aedeagus relatively long and slenderı ratio of phallobase length/paramere width 2.6 ( Figure 4 View Figure 4 (f)). Ventroapical plate of phallobase absent ( Figure 4 View Figure 4 (h)). Parameres symmetricalı mediobasal margins of dorsomedial lobes strongly sclerotised (4G)ı dorsal sides of the parameres strongly overlapping and separated by a slit ( Figure 4 View Figure 4 (f)ı arrowed).
Distribution
The species was described from Aliñahui (Ecuadorı Napo Province) and Gigante (Huilaı Colombia). The new records are from Curaray River (Peruı Loreto) and San Martín (Colombiaı Meta) ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Aegidinus simulatus Colbyı 2009
| Frolov, Andrey V., Akhmetova, Lilia A. & Vaz-de-Mello, Fernando Z. 2019 |
Aegidinus simulatus Colbyı 2009: 32
| Colbyi 2009: 32 |
