Euglossa (Glossura) natesi, Parra-H, Alejandro, Ospina-Torres, Rodulfo & Ramírez, Santiago, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.173581 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6259135 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9D2887B4-802C-165E-F129-BB85C3ADFCE6 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Euglossa (Glossura) natesi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Euglossa (Glossura) natesi View in CoL , n. sp. ParraH, OspinaTorres & Ramírez
Syn. Euglossa amoena Dressler, Nomen nudum
Males only, females unknown.
Diagnosis. Separated from other members of the genus by the combination of tongue length (twice body size), sternum 2 with no tufts or depressions, bluegreen scutum and bronze metasoma.
Dimensions. Total length 16.88 mm (16.00–18.00); head width 5.95 mm (5.88–6.00); intertegular span 4.18 mm (3.90–4.40); abdominal width 5.40 mm (5.06–5.80); tongue in repose exceeding twice body length.
Head. Mandibles bidentate; labrum longer than wide, with welldefined median keel, two weak lateral keels and two translucent spots; side of clypeus and paraocular area bluegreen; clypeus dark bluegreen; lateral margins of clypeus dark maroon, medial ridge black ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ); clypeus prominent, with pronounced medial keel and two less prominent lateral keels; paraocular markings dirty white, narrow above, broader below ( Figs. 1, 3 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ); antennal scape black; upper frons blue. Tongue in repose about twice body length, 28.35 mm (27.75–30.55); clypeus length 1.86 mm (1.58–1.92), clypeus width 2.11 mm (2.00–2.42); clypeocular distance 0.18 mm (0.16–0.21); head length 2.73 mm (2.58–3.00); head width 5.95 mm (5.90–6.00); eye length 3.77 mm (3.63–3.83); lower interocular distance 3.04 mm (2.96–3.08); upper interocular distance 2.36 mm (2.25–2.60); antennocular distance 0.56 mm (0.50–0.58); upper interantennal distance 1.45 mm (1.30–1.58); antennocellar distance 1.23 mm (1.13–1.25); interocellar distance 0.24 mm (0.21–0.29); ocellocular distance 0.71 mm (0.67–0.75).
Mesosoma and metasoma. Mesoscutum and scutellum bluegreen; mesepisternum green; abdomen golden bronze ( Fig. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ). Scutellum rounded on posterior margin, about half as long as wide, with strong median depression ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 3 ); sternum 2 without tufts or depressions; total body length 16.88 mm (16.00–18.00); mesoscutum width at anterior end of tegulae 4.10 mm (3.90–4.40); metasoma width 5.40 mm (5.06–5.80). Hind tibia bluegreen. Posterior tuft of midtibia lacking, anterior tuft oblong, shorter than width of velvet area ( Figs. 4, 5 View FIGURES 4 – 9 ); velvet area of midtibia wide, tapering below; midtibia with acute apical process ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 4 – 9 ); midtibial spur serrate; hind tibia triangular, narrow, about half as wide as long. Midtibia length 3.31 mm (3.17–3.50); midtibia width 1.34 mm (1.31–1.38); midbasitarsus length 2.93 mm (2.79–3.00); midbasitarsus width 0.84 mm (0.79–0.88); hind tibia length 5.38 mm (5.17–5.58); hind tibia width 2.76 mm (2.67–2.83). Wing venation dark brown; wing membrane light brown. Jugal comb at base of hind wing with 12–14 blades.
Pilosity. Unbranched, black, long (~ 0.5 mm) sparse setae on vertex; branched, yellow, short (~ 0.2 mm) setae mixed with unbranched, black, long (~ 0.4 mm) setae on mesoscutum; unbranched, black, long (~ 0.4 mm) setae on scutellum; dense, branched, yellow, long (~ 0.7 mm) setae on mesepisternum and genal area.
Punctation. Disc of clypeus with coarse, shallow punctation; mesepisternum shallowly punctate, almost mirrorlike; mesoscutum with fine, sparse punctation, interspaces about 3 times width of punctures; scutellum covered by shallow, sparse punctation; terga 1–4 with shallow, sparse, irregularly shaped punctures with thin band of fine, dense, symmetrical punctures on posterior margin; terga 5–6 with coarse, shallow punctures; basal end of hind tibia with shallow, irregularly shaped punctures.
Genitalia and hidden metasomal sterna. Line drawings of sterna 7, 8 and the genital capsule are provided in Figures 6–9 View FIGURES 4 – 9 . Sternum 7 with small lobes ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 4 – 9 ), with setal patches on each end (not shown in Fig. 6 View FIGURES 4 – 9 ); sternum 8 with strongly curved apical process, spiculum pronounced in lateral view ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 4 – 9 ). Gonocoxite lobes of genitalia rounded, notched at base ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 4 – 9 ); penis valve extending slightly beyond gonostylar setae; dorsal bridge of penis valve (dbpv) curved, with pronounced hornlike processes ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 4 – 9 ). Gonostylus with two lobes ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 4 – 9 ): lower lobe long, digitiform, with thick, short, unbranched setae; upper lobe rounded with thick, long, unbranched setae.
Var ia t io n. Based on a sample size of 10 individuals, low variation (<10%) was found in most of the characters examined here, apart from clypeus length (10.54%), interocellar distance (13.79%), malar area (19.86%), and the coloration of the facial markings, which range from ivory white to light brown.
Etymology. The epithet natesi honors professor Guiomar NatesParra, from the Universidad Nacional de Colombia, who founded the Laboratorio de Investigaciones en Abejas (LABUN) and pioneered research on Colombian bees.
Holotype. COLOMBIA: Nariño, Municipality of Barbacoas, Altaquer, La Tajada. April 7 2005, 960 m, collected by Alejandro ParraH in trap baited with cineole, male (deposited in LABUN).
Paratypes. COLOMBIA: Antioquia, Urrao, La Clara, 1270 m., 8 Nov. 1982, J. P. Folsom B58C (Dressler coll.), 1 male, (deposited in MCZ). Valle, Rio Anchicayá, 400 m, IX281976, Bell, Breed & Michener, male, (deposited in KU). Nariño, Municipality Barbacoas, Altaquer, La Tajada, 960 m, five males collected in traps baited with Cineole and Eugenol, collected by Victor Solarte, (deposited LABUN). ECUADOR: Esmeraldas, km 17 LitaAlto Tambo, 730 m 18 Jan. 1990, collected in traps baited with cineole by M. Whitten, 2 males labeled 122 and 123 (deposited in FLAS).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |