Telenomus ekadanta, Veenakumari & Prashanth, 2019
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2019v41a18 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6E50635A-9895-4BBA-B31A-8E147494BF6D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3729228 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7C1F0408-2251-4516-BD32-28BB76D0E04F |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:7C1F0408-2251-4516-BD32-28BB76D0E04F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Telenomus ekadanta |
status |
sp. nov. |
Telenomus ekadanta n. sp.
( Fig. 8 View FIG )
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:7C1F0408-2251-4516-BD32-28BB76D0E04F
TYPE MATERIAL. — Holotype. ♀, ICAR / NBAIR / P2071 , India: Karnataka: Mandya, Madduru , 12°58’41”N, 77°04’34”E, 646 m, YPT, 14.VI.2016. GoogleMaps
Paratypes. 46 ♀, ICAR / NBAIR /P2072-P2086, 15 ♀, same data as holotype . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2087-P2096, 10 ♀, Madhya Pradesh: Bhopal, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering ( CIAE) , 23°18’48”N, 77°24’27”E, 499 m, YPT, 15.VI.2011 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2097, 1 ♀ , Karnataka: Bengaluru, Hebbal , 13°02’08”N, 77°58’42”E, 927 m, YPT, 29.XII.2007 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2098, 1 ♀, same as P2097, PFT, 10.V.2011 . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2099, 1 ♀, same as P2098, 29.I.2010 . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2100, 1 ♀, same as P2098, 20.III.2010 . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2101-P2104, 4 ♀ , Karnataka : Bengaluru, Attur , 13°09’25”N, 77°56’41”E 936 m, YPT, 01.VIII.2015 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2105, 1 ♀ , Karnataka: GKVK, 13°04’25”N, 77°34’49”E, 938 m, YPT, 20.VII.2015 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2106, 1 ♀ , Karnataka: Bengaluru, Jarakabande Kaval , 13°05’41”N, 77°32’35”E, 921 m, YPT, 19.IV.2013 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2107, 1 ♀ , Karnataka : Bengaluru, Lal Bagh Botanical Garden , 12°57’02”N, 77°35’05”E, 907 m, SN, 12.IV.2010 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2108, 1 ♀ , Karnataka: Mandya, Madduru , 12°58’41”N, 77°04’34”E, 646 m, YPT, 19.IV.2012 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2109, 1 ♀, same as P2108, SN, 16.IX.2010 . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2110, P2111, 2 ♀ , Odisha: Bhubaneshwar , Orissa University of Agricultural Technology ( OUAT) , YPT, 29.I.2016 . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2112, 1♀, Goa: Ela, Farmers’ Training Centre , 15°29’29”N, 73°55’01”E, 16 m, YPT, 14.VII.2015 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2113, 1 ♀ , Tamil Nadu: Kodaikanal, Shenbaganur , 10°14’01”N, 77°30’47”E, 1865 m, YPT, 02.IV.2014 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2114, 1♀ , Tamil Nadu: Krishnagiri, Kelamangalam , Jakkeri , 12°42’17”N, 77°48’37”E, 899 m, YPT, 12.XI.2015 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2115, 1 ♀ , Tamil Nadu: Yercaud, Horticulture Research Station , 11°46’30”N, 78°12’33”E, 1399 m, Suction trap, 05.VIII.2016 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2116, 1 ♀ , Rajasthan: Ajmer, Tabiji , National Research Centre on Seed Spices ( NRCSS) , 26°21’56”N, 74°35’36”E, 445 m, YPT, 27.XI.2016 GoogleMaps . — ICAR / NBAIR /P2116, 1 ♀ , Tamil Nadu: Hogenakkal , 12°06’57”N 77°46’38”E, 250 m, SN, 06.II.2015 GoogleMaps .
DIAGNOSIS. — This species is closer to T. flaviventris but differs from it in the following combination of character states. In T. flaviventris frons predominantly smooth, hyperoccipital carina present, occiput smooth and mesoscutum smooth, IOS half the width of head and subequal to eye length, T2 wider than long, entirely smooth; whereas in T. ekadanta n. sp. frons laterally and ventrally reticulate, occipital carina invaginate as an inverted ‘v’ shaped carina, hyperoccipital carina absent, occiput and mesoscutum coriaceous reticulate, IOS at most 0.35 × width of head and at most 0.65 × eye length, T2 at least 1.4 × as long as wide, with short striae on anterior margin.
ETYMOLOGY. — This species is named ‘ekadanta’ after the Hindu God Lord Ganesha. The name is treated as a noun in the genitive case.
DESCRIPTION
Measurement
Body length = 0.98 mm; (m = 1.08 [0.85 to 1.20] mm, SD=0.09, n= 25).
Colour
Head and mesosoma black; metasoma golden brown with posterior tergites dark brown; legs yellow brown except for brown fore coxae; eyes silvery; entire antenna dark brown; mandibles reddish brown ( Fig. 8A View FIG ).
Head ( Fig. 8 View FIG A-F)
FCI = 1.44; LCI= 1.25; IOS 0.63 × eye length; frons dorsally and medially smooth, in (some paratypes medially with sparse foveae) remainder coriaceous reticulate, setose; gena predominantly smooth except for weak reticulations towards posterior orbit; vertex coriaceous reticulate, densely setose; eyes (L: W= 19.4: 16.8) large, with dense setae; POL: LOL in ratio of 8.1:5.3; lateral ocelli contiguous with orbits; hyperoccipital carina and preoccipital area absent; occiput coriaceous reticulate; occipital carina invaginating into occiput.
Mesosoma ( Fig. 8 View FIG A-C, F)
Mesoscutum (L: W= 19.3: 24.4) coriaceous reticulate, setose; lateral pronotal area dorsally and antero-ventrally coriaceous reticulate, remainder smooth; mesopleuron anteriorly smooth, remainder weakly reticulate, prespecular and mesepimeral sulci nonfoveate; sternaulus non foveate; mesopleural pit distinct; mesopleural carina distinct, mesopleural depression smooth; antero-ventral margin of metapleuron weakly rugose, remainder smooth; metapleural pit distinct; scutoscutellar sulcus narrow; mesoscutellum semicircular, entirely smooth, setose; posterior mesoscutellar sulcus deeply foveate; metascutellum rectangular, smooth (in some paratypes weakly striate) with no foveae on anterior margin; metanotal trough smooth; lateral propodeal area smooth; fore wing (L: W=66.1: 21.0) and hind wing (L:W=59.3: 9.7) with dense microtrichia; length of fore wing and hind wing marginal cilia 0.14 × and 0.57 × width of their respective wings.
Metasoma ( Fig. 8A View FIG )
(L: W=37.8: 23.4); T1 weakly foveate anteriorly, remainder smooth; in some paratypes the basal foveae are strongly indicated; T1 with a weak lateral carina; T1 with two lateral and one sublateral setae; T2 with basal foveae anteromedially, followed by short weak striae, remainder smooth; length and width of tergites T1: T 2 in ratio of 3.5: 11.7, 24.8: 17.5, respectively; ovipositor not visible externally.
Male
Not known.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |