Drymeia pribilofensis (Malloch, 1919)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1024.60393 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:52DD663A-1C91-4E86-A8E3-A68C33F1A9EF |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9B290594-E2E3-5830-ADB3-CCAC8898D007 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Drymeia pribilofensis (Malloch, 1919) |
status |
|
Drymeia pribilofensis (Malloch, 1919) View in CoL Figs 4A View Figure 4 , 5A View Figure 5 , 8B View Figure 8
Eupogonomyia pribilofensis Malloch, 1921: 179.
Pogonomyia inaequalis Malloch, 1922: 81.
Type material examined.
Eupogonomyia pribilofensis - Holotype male labelled " St. Paul Isd. / Alaska / VI-21-20"; "Presented by/ G.D. Hanna / Collector"/ " HOLOTYPE / pribilifensis [red]"; " Eupogonomyia / Drymeia pribilofensis / Mall. Type" ( CAS) .
Other material examined.
More than 400 males and females from: Nearctic: Canada: Manitoba: Churchill ; Northwest Territories: Aklavik, Aulavik Nt. Pk. (Banks Island), Kidluit Bay, Mould Bay , Tuktoyaktuk ; Nunavut: Arviat [formerly Eskimo point], Bathurst Inlet, Cambridge Bay, Chesterfield, Coral Harbour, Frobisher Bay, Kugluktuk [formerly Coppermine], Landing Lake (7.5 km NW of Rankin Inlet), Naujaat [formerly Repulse Bay], Padlei, Williamson Lake ; Quebec: Inukjuak [formerly Port Harrison], Kangirsuk [formerly Payne Bay], Sugluk ; Yukon Territory: Herschel Island. Palaearctic: Russia: Taymyr Peninsula: Ary-Mas cordon, 90 km NW Khatanga, Dixon ; Yamalo-Nenez AO ; Chukotka AO: Wrangel Island ; Sakha Republic: Chokurdakh, Indigirka River ( BUIC, CNC, LEM, SZMN) .
Distribution.
Nearctic: Canada (Manitoba, Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Quebec, Yukon Territory), USA (Alaska). Palaearctic: Russia (W Siberia, Far East (Wrangel I. )) .
DNA Barcode.
BOLDBIN: BOLD:AAD7664 (BIN merge with several other species, see Fig. 25 View Figure 25 ). See Suppl. material 1: Table S1 for GenBank accession numbers.
Remark.
Males of this species can be readily identified based on the combination of a reduced prealar, strongly projecting face (Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ) and distinctive chaetotaxy of the mid femur but the females can be difficult to distinguish from those of D. setibasis and D. cantabrigensis (see key to females). All barcoded specimens of D. pribilofensis from our dataset clustered closest to one another on the neighbour-joining tree (Fig. 25 View Figure 25 ) with a maximum intraspecific p-distance of 0.15% but the distance to D. cristata , one of the seven species found in the BOLD:AAD7664BIN merge was very low (min p-distance = 0.61%). We would therefore not recommend using COI to discriminate specimens of D. pribilofensis from those of other species in this BIN.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.