Diphya napo, Ott & Rodrigues & Brescovit, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1678-4766e2023004 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10668136 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9A7CDF1F-C22A-8E3F-FC6B-FD50FA2B0999 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Diphya napo |
status |
sp. nov. |
Diphya napo , sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:E2D692C2-D24B-45C4-9147-10A241FCC2A0
( Figs 39-58 View Figs 39-48 View Figs 49-57 View Fig )
Types: male holotype and GoogleMaps female paratype IBSP 283136; GoogleMaps male paratype IBSP 283137; GoogleMaps male paratype MCN-ARA 56875; all from Equador: Napo, Cantón Quijos, Parroquia Cosanga , Yanayacu Research Station (00°35.955’S 77°53.431’W) 2128 asl, 24-31.XI.2009, Equipe PBI Oonopidae leg GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The species name is a noun in apposition taken from the type locality.
Diagnosis. The male palp of Diphya napo sp. nov. resembles the South American species of Dyphia by the shape of cymbium, embolus, conductor and also the rounded prolateral paracymbium; however it can be easily distinguished from all known South American species by the shape of the retrolateral tibial apophysis, which is flattened, slightly C-shaped in the prolateral and retrolateral view, elongated, with internal groove on bulb facing side and a very conspicuous spur at distal end ( Figs 8F View Figs 6-10 , H-J); retrolateral tibial apophysis is inconspicuous in D. bicolor (see Figs 6-9 View Figs 6-10 , 11, 15, 16 View Figs 11-16 ), hook-like in D. spinifera (see also ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA & HORMIGA, 2011:744, fig. 29C, F) and finger-like in D. macrophtalma (see MARUSIK & OMELKO, 2017:4-5, figs 12, 16-18). Females of Diphya napo sp. nov. can be recognized by the epigynum without a conspicuous marginal plate and anterior pockets, by the presence of a septum dividing the whole atrium and by the large, triangular-shaped basal plate ( Figs 54-57 View Figs 49-57 ). The last character is shared between D. napo and African species of the genus (see OMELKO et al., 2020:275-276, figs 11A-D, 12A-L; same as “Sb, septum base”).
Description. Male (Paratype, IBSP 283137). Carapace yellow, border of eyes black, cephalic portion behind eyes with olive-colored pattern; borders of carapace slightly darker, suffused with olive color ( Figs 39-42 View Figs 39-48 ). Chelicerae yellow; endites suffused with olive color; labium yellow with anterior border suffused with olive color; sternum yellow, border with narrow olive colored area ( Figs 42, 43 View Figs 39-48 ). Legs yellow with conspicuous, dark olive-colored distal markings at each article and also a stripe of same color at first half of tibia of legs I and II; tarsi of legs I-IV orange, metatarsi of legs I and II also orange ( Figs 39, 40, 43 View Figs 39-48 ). Abdomen oval, slightly elongated, with cream colored background; dorsally with some very small, white guanine dots at anterior half; two olive-colored, broad, sinuous lines on each border, and some transversal olive lines in the posterior quarter ( Fig. 41 View Figs 39-48 ); laterally with a large, white guanine patch on the anterior third and from this patch backwards some wrinkled tegument bearing olive colored longitudinal lines ( Figs 39, 40 View Figs 39-48 ); ventrally suffused in olive color around the book lungs area, central area cream colored without patterns, some transversal olive lines in front of spinnerets ( Fig. 43 View Figs 39-48 ).
Measurements: total length 2.63; carapace 1.48 long, 1.14 wide; eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.06; ALE 0.17; PME 0.16; PLE 0.16; AME-AME 0.03; AME-ALE 0.02; PME–PME 0.05; legs: femur I 1.91; patella + tibia I 2.27; metatarsus I 2.30; tarsus I 0.96; patella + tibia II 1.71; patella + tibia III 0.96; patella + tibia IV 1.29; palp: cymbium 0.35; tibia 0.18. Palp with orange-colored bulbus, tibia, patella and femur yellow; bulb relatively small, length about half of chelicerae length; cymbium covering almost the whole bulbus when in prolateral view ( Figs 8B, H View Figs 6-10 ); embolus and cymbial ectomedian process heavily sclerotized ( Figs 45-48 View Figs 39-48 ); broad conductor with an stout and abruptly narrowed tip ( Figs 45-48 View Figs 39-48 ); paracymbium rounded distally; retrolateral apophysis slightly flattened and C-shaped with internal groove on bulb facing side and a very conspicuous spur at distal end ( Figs 44, 46-48 View Figs 39-48 ).
Female (paratype, IBSP 283136 View Materials ). As in male except as noted ( Figs 49-53 View Figs 49-57 ). Abdomen slightly oval, almost rounded, more conspicuous dorsally ( Fig. 51 View Figs 49-57 ); laterally and ventrally olive-colored markings distributed in patches rather than in stripes, small white guanine dots present ( Figs 49, 50, 52 View Figs 49-57 ) .
Measurements: total length 3.60; carapace 1.68 long, 1.38 wide; eye diameters and interdistances: AME 0.06; ALE 0.17; PME 0.16; PLE 0.16; AME-AME 0.03; AME-ALE 0.02; PME–PME 0.05; legs: femur I 1.58; patella + tibia I 2.02; metatarsus I 1.72; tarsus I 0.83; patella + tibia II 1,80; patella + tibia III 0.92; patella + tibia IV 1,26. Epigynum with large basal plate forming a posteriorly directed, broad, triangular, and flaplike projection; lateral plates strongly sclerotized at ectal borders; atrium clearly divided by septum; copulatory openings at mesal portion of atrium, at anterior border of basal plate ( Figs 54, 56, 57 View Figs 49-57 ); copulatory ducts originating at dorsal most portion of atrium, directed posteriorly and then ventrally, making a strong 180 degree turn in dorsal direction and then running ectally to the spermathecae ( Figs 54-57 View Figs 49-57 ); fertilization ducts runs straight from spermathecae to posterior direction and then mesally along the posterior border of the basal plate; spermathecae comma-shaped, anterior portion rounded (Figs 56,57).
Variation. Males (n=3): total length 2.63−2.69; carapace length 1.48−1.55; femur I length 1.91−2.14.
Distribution. Known only for the type locality ( Fig 58 View Fig ).
IBSP |
Brazil,Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Instituto Butantan |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |