Omangidiella parvidactyla, Iannilli, Valentina, Holsinger, John R., Ruffo, Sandro & Ronald, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.172397 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6256139 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/99623F60-FFD0-FFE4-1D48-FD88322B324E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Omangidiella parvidactyla |
status |
sp. nov. |
Omangidiella parvidactyla View in CoL new species
Figs. 4 View FIGURE 4 , 5 View FIGURE 5
Material examined (expedition station number in parentheses is from Stock et al. 1997)
Sultanate of Oman. (96–67) border of wadi Taww at Halban (23°34’N; 58°01’ E), 3 paratype specimens, 1 April 1996, with thermosbaenaceans, cyclopid copepods, oligochaetes, diverse insect larvae; (96–75) Wadi Bani Henay (26°30’35"N; 57°19’34"E), pump in gravel at 50 cm below sediment surface, 10 paratype specimens, 1 April 1996, with thermosbaenaceans, stenasellid isopods, oligochaetes, chironomids; (96–76) same place and date as (96–75), probe; at 1.20 cm, 10 paratype specimens (very damaged), with thermosbaenaceans, stenasellid isopods, cyclopid copepods; (96–77) Wadi Bani Henay (26°30’35"N; 57°19’34"E) pump in gravel probe at 90 cm, 1 female paratype, 1 April 1996, with thermosbeanaceans, stenasellids, chironomids. Wadi Nakhl (ca. 23° 26’ N 57° 52’ E), Oesterreich Expedition, female holotype (collection date unknown) dissected and mounted in Faure’s medium on slides 4577–4581, 2 paratypes (slides 4582–4591) deposited in Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Verona (MVRCr 444), and 5 paratypes in ethanol deposited in Zoological Museum Amsterdam.
Description
The description is based on the holotype female from Wadi Nakhl, with exception of the mouthparts, which are based on a paratype female from Wadi Bani Henay (see above).
Female (3.0 mm) with oostegites.— Antenna 1: ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 a) ratio of articles 1–3 of peduncle = 1:0.8:0.5, articles without spines, with only few short setae; flagellum little longer than peduncle, with 13 articles increasing in length distally, bearing only fine setae, and without aesthetascs; accessory flagellum uniarticulate, shorter than article 1 of flagellum. Antenna 2 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 b) shorter than antenna 1, with few short setae; glandcone not elongate; articles 4 and 5 of peduncle subequal in length; flagellum less than half length of peduncle, with 5 articles, the distal one very short.
Mouthparts: labrum (upper lip) rounded distally ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 c). Left mandible ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 d): incisor 5dentate; lacinia mobilis also 5dentate and followed by 4 setulose rakers; molar triturative and articulated on short conical base, bearing 1 long plumose seta; mandibular palp reduced in length, article 2 longer than article 3; article 3 bearing only single apical seta; right mandible ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 e) similar to left but lacinia mobilis pluridenticulate; labium (lower lip) ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 f) with well developed inner lobes and rather short, blunt lateral processes. Maxilla 1 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 g); palp reduced in length and bearing only 2 apical setae; outer plate with 7 serrate spines (3 external ones 4toothed and 4 internal ones pectinate); inner plate with 3 naked apical setae. Maxilla 2 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 h): inner plate little shorter than outer, with many fine setae along inner margin distally, apically with 6 distal spines, the 2 inner ones plumose. Maxilliped ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 i): coxal endite partially fused with inner lobe and similar to those of Nubigidiella , bearing fine setae distally and 1 spine apically; inner lobe bearing 2 short, stout bifid spines apically; outer lobe scarcely expanded, bearing 3 blade spines subapically on inner margin; palp article 2 expanded; dactylus as long as preceding article, with fine pubescence on inner face.
Gnathopod 1 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 l): coxa subrectangular, ratio length:height = 1:0.7, with 2 setules on anterodistally rounded corner; basis relatively broad, with 3 long setae on posterior margin; merus with pubescent posterior margin; carpus produced into narrowly rounded ventral lobe, partly pubescent and bearing 2 long distal and 2 long subdistal setae; propodus ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 l’) subtrapezoidal, palm rather short, only about 40 percent as long as the posterior margin, margin uneven and bearing only few setae and 1 or 2 spines near defining angle; posterior margin nearly straight, without spines or setae; dactylus falcate and closing on defining angle. Gnathopod 2 ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 m, n) strikingly different from gnathopod 1: coxa similar to coxa 1 but ventral margin weakly rounded; basis with 2 long setae on posterior margin; carpus elongate, as long as basis and longer than propodus, posterior margin pubescent and bearing 2–4 groups of 2 long setae each; propodus ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 n’) elongate and weakly suboval but little shorter than carpus, medial and lateral faces with inferior and superior rows of numerous short, fine setae; palmar margin very short, without defining spines; posterior margin with approximately 9 long setae; dactylus reduced to small, curved, toothlike process.
Pereopods 3 and 4 similar ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 a): ratio coxa length:height = 1:0.6, ventral margin with 2 anterodistal setules each; basis broad, anterior margin convex and bearing large lenticular organ; merus, carpus and propodus subequal in length, with few short marginal setae; dactylus rather short, ratio propodus:dactylus = 1:0.4. Posterior and inferior margins of coxal plates 1–4 thinly sclerotized. Pereopod 5 ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 b): coxa anteriorly lobed, with posterodistal spine; basis suboval, anterior and posterior margins with 4 or 5 short spines, distal half with a large lenticular organ; merus, carpus, and propodus subequal in length, with few short marginal spines; ratio propodus:dactylus = 1:0.4. Pereopod 6 ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 c) similar to pereopod 5 but distinctly longer; coxa with anterior lobe of coxa reduced; basis with a large lenticular organ on distal half of posterior margin; ratio propodus:dactylus = 1:0.4. Pereopod 7 the longest ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 d); basis little wider than those of pereopods 5 and 6, without lenticular organ, anterior margin with 4 short spines, posterior margin with 6 short spines; merus, carpus and propodus subequal in length but much stronger than those of pereopods 5 and 6; propodus little longer and more robust than two preceding articles, anterior margin with row of 5 or 6 short spines accompanied by long setae; dactylus comparatively long, ratio propodus:dactylus = 1:0.37. Anterior and inferior margins of coxal plates 5–7 thinly sclerotized. Oostegites on pereopods 2–5, elongate, with long marginal and distal setae.
Pleonal plates: posteroventral corners rounded and not produced ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 e). Pleopods ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 e) greatly reduced; inner rami absent; outer rami reduced to 3 articles, the terminal one very short; peduncles nearly twice length of rami, each with 2 coupling spines ( Fig. View FIGURE 5
5e’). Uropod 1 ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 f): inner and outer rami subequal in length, armed with only 3 apical spines on outer and 4 on inner; peduncle longer than either rami, armed with 9 or 10 spines on upper margin and 3 basofacial spines. Uropod 2 shorter than uropod 1 ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 g): outer ramus shorter than inner ramus, armed with 4 apical spines; inner ramus as long as peduncle, armed with 4 apical spines; peduncle with 5 spines. Uropod 3 ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 h): rami approximately equal in length (aequiramus), each bearing several sets of lateral spines in groups of 1, 2, or 3; apex with 3 or 4 spines. Telson ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 i) about as broad as long at base but slightly tapered distally; each side with 1 mediolateral spine and 1 penicillate seta; apical margin convex and armed with 2 + 2 distolateral spines.
Male unknown.
Typelocality
Wadi Nakhl, located at approximately 23° 26’ N; 57° 52’ E ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ). There are no other details available on the date of collection or the physical/chemical characteristics of this locality.
Derivatio nominis
The epithet parvidactyla is derived from the latin parvus (small) and dactylus (finger), denoting the very small dactylus of gnathopod 2.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |