Udamopyga setigena ( Enderlein, 1928 )

Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos & Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De, 2018, Review of the Brazilian species of Udamopyga Hall, 1938 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae), with the description of a new species and a key to males and females, Zootaxa 4508 (1), pp. 1-27 : 20-24

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77343F9E-8441-45C6-A8D1-2DB33C72D3E8

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5957361

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794-FF9E-B226-EAC5-FF12AA33AB57

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Udamopyga setigena ( Enderlein, 1928 )
status

 

Udamopyga setigena ( Enderlein, 1928) View in CoL

( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 41–45 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 , 57 View FIGURES 52–57 )

Udamoctis setigena Enderlein, 1928: 129 View in CoL –130. Type locality: Paraguay, Santa Trinidad. Sarcophaga ogloblini Lopes, 1939: 119 View in CoL –121. Type locality: Argentina, Missiones. Merokellymyia nodositas Blanchard, 1939: 843 View in CoL –845. Type locality: Argentina, Missiones. Udamopyga ogloblini: Lopes (1940: 940–941) View in CoL . Udamopyga setigena: Hall (1938: 256) View in CoL . References. Townsend (1931; placement in Micronotochaeta Townsend ); Hall (1938; placement in Udamopyga View in CoL ); Lopes (1940;

comments and Merokellymyia nodositas View in CoL as synonym of Udamopyga ogloblini View in CoL ); Travassos (1941; fieldwork report); Lopes

(1943; descriptions of larval instars 1 and 2, and Udamopyga ogloblini as synonym of U. setigena ); Dodge (1965; key);

Lopes (1968; comments on U. setigena type); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1988; key); Pape (1996; catalog); Mello-

Patiu et al. (2014; key to genera and list of species from Argentina); Dufek et al. (2015; checklist).

Type-material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂ of U. ogloblini : “Est. Exp. [ Estación Experimental ] Loreto [ Argentina, Misiones]/ 1936. v.22 / Dr. A. Ogloblin [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Sarcophaga / ogloblini / n. sp. / S. Lopes—Det. 937 [1937] [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ MNRJ / 2300 [printed at vertical on white paper]” ( MNRJ) [holotype in good condition; terminalia not dissected].

PARATYPES of U. ogloblini : 4 ♀ f, same data as holotype except vi.1936 ; 1 ♂: Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, São João de Montenegro, i.1933, P. Dacorso leg ; 1 ♀: Brazil, Goiás, Campinas [Goiânia], i.1936, T. Borgmeier and H.S. Lopes leg. ( MNRJ) [paratypes in good conditions; one ♀ from Argentina with terminalia mounted on microscope slide N o 13615] .

Additional material examined. Argentina: 1 ♂, Salta Province, Department of San Martín , Provincia de Salta, 500–800m, 10.i.1957, P. Wygodzinsky leg. Brazil: 1 ♂, Espírito Santo, Linhares , vi.1972, P.C. Elias leg. ; 1 ♂, Goiás, Goiânia , viii.1943, Freitas & Nobre leg. ; 1 ♂, Mato Grosso do Sul, Miranda, Salobra , i.1941, Com. IOC leg. [Commission Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] ; 1 ♂, Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Reserva Biológica Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, 23.x.2013, R. Toma leg. ; 1 ♂, Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre , R. Di Primio leg. ; 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, Santa Catarina, Nova Teutônia [Seara], 27°11’S 52°23’W, vi.1960, F. Plaumann leg. GoogleMaps Paraguay: 1 ♂, Central Department, Areguá , Isla Valle , vi.1944, Missão Científica Brasileira leg. (MNRJ).

Diagnosis. Male cercus with a tuft of long setae on cercal base ( Figs 42–43 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); vesica formed of two concave lobes with striated ornamentation and inner ventral margin as two spinose projections ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 44–45 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); juxta with two lobes, each with lateral margin turned backward near base in lateral view ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 44–45 View FIGURES 41–45 ). Female T6 undivided and convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST5 wider than long; ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; epiproct membranous, with two or three pairs of setae.

Redescription. Differs from U. squamata sp. nov. as follows:

Male (n = 10). Length: 9–15 mm; parafacial, fronto-orbital plate and postocular orbits with golden pruinosity; frons about 0.24x head width at level of ocellar triangle; 7–9 well-developed frontal setae reaching level of apex of pedicel; gena and genal groove with pale golden pruinosity; 10–12 meral setae; T5 with 12 marginal setae; ST5 with rounded arms and a short window with numerous setulae ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); terminalia reddish-brown; cercal prong narrow in distal third (posterior view), blackish apically and projected anteriorly (lateral view) ( Figs 42–43 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); surstylus long, of similar length as cercus, with a very narrow base and numerous setae along anterior margin ( Figs 42 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); pregonite with a long, weakly sclerotized median projection ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 41–45 ); postgonite straight with rounded apex and a long seta near apex ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 41–45 ); basiphallus longer than distiphallus ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 41–45 ); vesica formed of two concave lobes with striated ornamentation and inner ventral margin as two spinose projections ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 44– 45 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); juxta with two lobes, each medially projected in distal margin (ventral and dorsal views) and with lateral margin turned backward near base (lateral view) ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 44–45 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); lateral stylus narrow with a laterally elongated base and small spines in distal half; median stylus with a spinose apex ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 1–6 , 45 View FIGURES 41–45 ).

Female (n = 7). Length: 9–13 mm. Differs from male as follows: frons about 0.35x head width at level of ocellar triangle; T6 convex along midline dorsally, without a longitudinal crease ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST2–3 with one pair of long setae; ST5 wider than long; terminalia yellowish brown; ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; vaginal plate weakly sclerotized; epiproct membranous, with two or three pairs of setae ( Lopes 1940: figs 27–28; as U. oglobini ).

Distribution. Argentina (Corrientes, Misiones, Salta *); Brazil (Espírito Santo *, Góias, Mato Grosso *, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, São Paulo); Paraguay (Central*, Itapúa).

Remarks. Udamopyga setigena is morphologically similar to U. percita and U. provecta . See remarks under U. percita .

MNRJ

Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro

IOC

Colecao de Culturas de Fungos do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Sarcophagidae

Genus

Udamopyga

Loc

Udamopyga setigena ( Enderlein, 1928 )

Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos & Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De 2018
2018
Loc

Udamoctis setigena

Lopes, H. S. 1939: 119
Blanchard, E. E. 1939: 843
Hall, D. G. 1938: 256
Enderlein, G. 1928: 129
1928
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF