Udamopyga setigena ( Enderlein, 1928 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77343F9E-8441-45C6-A8D1-2DB33C72D3E8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5957361 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794-FF9E-B226-EAC5-FF12AA33AB57 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Udamopyga setigena ( Enderlein, 1928 ) |
status |
|
Udamopyga setigena ( Enderlein, 1928) View in CoL
( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 41–45 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 , 57 View FIGURES 52–57 )
Udamoctis setigena Enderlein, 1928: 129 View in CoL –130. Type locality: Paraguay, Santa Trinidad. Sarcophaga ogloblini Lopes, 1939: 119 View in CoL –121. Type locality: Argentina, Missiones. Merokellymyia nodositas Blanchard, 1939: 843 View in CoL –845. Type locality: Argentina, Missiones. Udamopyga ogloblini: Lopes (1940: 940–941) View in CoL . Udamopyga setigena: Hall (1938: 256) View in CoL . References. Townsend (1931; placement in Micronotochaeta Townsend ); Hall (1938; placement in Udamopyga View in CoL ); Lopes (1940;
comments and Merokellymyia nodositas View in CoL as synonym of Udamopyga ogloblini View in CoL ); Travassos (1941; fieldwork report); Lopes
(1943; descriptions of larval instars 1 and 2, and Udamopyga ogloblini as synonym of U. setigena ); Dodge (1965; key);
Lopes (1968; comments on U. setigena type); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1988; key); Pape (1996; catalog); Mello-
Patiu et al. (2014; key to genera and list of species from Argentina); Dufek et al. (2015; checklist).
Type-material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂ of U. ogloblini : “Est. Exp. [ Estación Experimental ] Loreto [ Argentina, Misiones]/ 1936. v.22 / Dr. A. Ogloblin [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Sarcophaga / ogloblini / n. sp. / S. Lopes—Det. 937 [1937] [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ MNRJ / 2300 [printed at vertical on white paper]” ( MNRJ) [holotype in good condition; terminalia not dissected].
PARATYPES of U. ogloblini : 4 ♀ f, same data as holotype except vi.1936 ; 1 ♂: Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul, São João de Montenegro, i.1933, P. Dacorso leg ; 1 ♀: Brazil, Goiás, Campinas [Goiânia], i.1936, T. Borgmeier and H.S. Lopes leg. ( MNRJ) [paratypes in good conditions; one ♀ from Argentina with terminalia mounted on microscope slide N o 13615] .
Additional material examined. Argentina: 1 ♂, Salta Province, Department of San Martín , Provincia de Salta, 500–800m, 10.i.1957, P. Wygodzinsky leg. Brazil: 1 ♂, Espírito Santo, Linhares , vi.1972, P.C. Elias leg. ; 1 ♂, Goiás, Goiânia , viii.1943, Freitas & Nobre leg. ; 1 ♂, Mato Grosso do Sul, Miranda, Salobra , i.1941, Com. IOC leg. [Commission Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] ; 1 ♂, Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, Reserva Biológica Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, 23.x.2013, R. Toma leg. ; 1 ♂, Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre , R. Di Primio leg. ; 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, Santa Catarina, Nova Teutônia [Seara], 27°11’S 52°23’W, vi.1960, F. Plaumann leg. GoogleMaps Paraguay: 1 ♂, Central Department, Areguá , Isla Valle , vi.1944, Missão Científica Brasileira leg. (MNRJ).
Diagnosis. Male cercus with a tuft of long setae on cercal base ( Figs 42–43 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); vesica formed of two concave lobes with striated ornamentation and inner ventral margin as two spinose projections ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 44–45 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); juxta with two lobes, each with lateral margin turned backward near base in lateral view ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 44–45 View FIGURES 41–45 ). Female T6 undivided and convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST5 wider than long; ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; epiproct membranous, with two or three pairs of setae.
Redescription. Differs from U. squamata sp. nov. as follows:
Male (n = 10). Length: 9–15 mm; parafacial, fronto-orbital plate and postocular orbits with golden pruinosity; frons about 0.24x head width at level of ocellar triangle; 7–9 well-developed frontal setae reaching level of apex of pedicel; gena and genal groove with pale golden pruinosity; 10–12 meral setae; T5 with 12 marginal setae; ST5 with rounded arms and a short window with numerous setulae ( Figs 41 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); terminalia reddish-brown; cercal prong narrow in distal third (posterior view), blackish apically and projected anteriorly (lateral view) ( Figs 42–43 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); surstylus long, of similar length as cercus, with a very narrow base and numerous setae along anterior margin ( Figs 42 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); pregonite with a long, weakly sclerotized median projection ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 41–45 ); postgonite straight with rounded apex and a long seta near apex ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 41–45 ); basiphallus longer than distiphallus ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 41–45 ); vesica formed of two concave lobes with striated ornamentation and inner ventral margin as two spinose projections ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 44– 45 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); juxta with two lobes, each medially projected in distal margin (ventral and dorsal views) and with lateral margin turned backward near base (lateral view) ( Figs 4–6 View FIGURES 1–6 , 44–45 View FIGURES 41–45 , 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); lateral stylus narrow with a laterally elongated base and small spines in distal half; median stylus with a spinose apex ( Figs 5 View FIGURES 1–6 , 45 View FIGURES 41–45 ).
Female (n = 7). Length: 9–13 mm. Differs from male as follows: frons about 0.35x head width at level of ocellar triangle; T6 convex along midline dorsally, without a longitudinal crease ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST2–3 with one pair of long setae; ST5 wider than long; terminalia yellowish brown; ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle ( Fig. 57 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; vaginal plate weakly sclerotized; epiproct membranous, with two or three pairs of setae ( Lopes 1940: figs 27–28; as U. oglobini ).
Distribution. Argentina (Corrientes, Misiones, Salta *); Brazil (Espírito Santo *, Góias, Mato Grosso *, Mato Grosso do Sul, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, São Paulo); Paraguay (Central*, Itapúa).
Remarks. Udamopyga setigena is morphologically similar to U. percita and U. provecta . See remarks under U. percita .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Udamopyga setigena ( Enderlein, 1928 )
Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos & Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De 2018 |
Udamoctis setigena
Lopes, H. S. 1939: 119 |
Blanchard, E. E. 1939: 843 |
Hall, D. G. 1938: 256 |
Enderlein, G. 1928: 129 |