Udamopyga provecta ( Lopes, 1939 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4508.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:77343F9E-8441-45C6-A8D1-2DB33C72D3E8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5957357 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/981F8794-FF9C-B220-EAC5-FF12AA33AD39 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Udamopyga provecta ( Lopes, 1939 ) |
status |
|
Udamopyga provecta ( Lopes, 1939) View in CoL
( Figs 37–40 View FIGURES 37–40 , 50 View FIGURES 46–51 , 56 View FIGURES 52–57 )
Sarcophaga provecta Lopes, 1939: 122 View in CoL –123. Type locality: Argentina, Missiones.
Udamopyga provecta: Lopes (1940: 937–938) View in CoL .
References. Lopes (1940; placement in Udamopyga View in CoL and revision); Dodge (1965; key); Lopes (1969a; catalog); Lopes (1988; key); Pape (1996; catalog); Mello-Patiu et al. (2009; checklist); Mello-Patiu et al. (2014; key to genera and list of species from Argentina); Buenaventura & Pape (2018; sarcophagine phylogeny).
Type-material examined. HOLOTYPE ♂: “Est. Exp. [ Estación Experimental ] Loreto / 1936. VI / Dr. A. Ogloblin [printed on white paper, black frame]” // [ EX] “ Col. Ins. O. Cruz [Collection Instituto Oswaldo Cruz] / N. 10047 [microscope slide;printed on white paper]” // “ Holotype [printed on red paper, black frame]” // “ Sarcophaga View in CoL / provecta View in CoL / n. sp. / S. Lopes—Det. 937 [1937] [printed on white paper, black frame]” // “ MNRJ / 2298 [printed vertically on white paper]” [holotype in good condition; terminalia dissected and mounted on microscope slide].
ALLOTYPE ♀: same data as holotype ( MNRJ) [in good condition,].
PARATYPES: 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ (one allotype): same data as holotype ( MNRJ) [paratypes in good condition, ♀ allotype with terminalia mounted on microscope slide N. 10048] .
Additional material examined. Argentina: 1 ♂, Salta Province, Department of San Martín, Aguaray , 500– 800m, 6–16.i.1957, P. Wygodzinsky leg. ( MNRJ) . Brazil: 1 ♂, Mato Grosso, Dourados , iii.1974, M. Alvarenga & O. Roppa leg. ( MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio de Janeiro, Nova Friburgo, Hotel Fazenda São João [Pico São João], 11.iii.1990, J. M. Costa & S. Marshall leg. ( MNRJ) ; 1 ♂, Rio Grande do Sul, Pelotas , 3.v.1961, C.M. Biezanko leg. ( MNRJ) ; 2 ♂♂, Santa Catarina, Nova Teutônia [Seara], 27°11’S 52°23’W, viii.1951, F. Plaumann leg. ( MNRJ) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Male cercus with numerous long setae of the same length on cercal base ( Figs 37–38 View FIGURES 37–40 , 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ); vesica formed of two blackish and sclerotized lobes with a cracked-looking integument and inner ventral margin as two long projections covered with microtrichia ( Figs 39–40 View FIGURES 37–40 , 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ); juxta formed of two lobes, well-individualized juxtal lobes with latero-anterior membranous projections ( Figs 39–40 View FIGURES 37–40 , 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ). Female T6 undivided and convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease, and with conspicuous golden setulae along apical margin ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST5 wider than long; ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; epiproct membranous, with two pairs of setae.
Redescription. Differs from U. squamata sp. nov. as follows:
Male (n = 8). Length: 8–13 mm; parafacial, fronto-orbital plate and posterior ocular orbits with golden pruinosity; frons about 0.22x head width at level of ocellar triangle; frontal vitta blackish along its whole length; 10–12 well-developed frontal setae reaching level of apex of pedicel; T5 with about 10 marginal setae and a set of long setae concentrated on ventral margin; cerci fused along their whole length and with apex truncate (posterior view), cercal prong blackish distally and with a small, anteriorly curved projection (lateral view) ( Figs 37–38 View FIGURES 37–40 , 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ); pregonite of similar length as postgonite, with a narrow apex, median projection and a weakly sclerotized area near apex in anterior margin ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37–40 ); postgonite almost straight, with narrow base and a long seta inserted almost in the middle ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37–40 ); basiphallus longer than distiphallus ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37–40 ); vesica formed of lobes with a dark margin, with a cracked-looking integument; inner ventral margin of vesica as two elongated projections covered with microtrichia ( Figs 39–40 View FIGURES 37–40 , 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ); juxtal lobes with latero-anterior membranous projections ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37–40 ); lateral stylus a bit shorter than median stylus ( Fig. 40 View FIGURES 37–40 ).
Female (n = 2). Length: 10–13 mm; frons about 0.27x head width at level of ocellar triangle; 9 well-developed frontal setae; ST4 with two pairs of long setae; ST5 wider than long; T6 undivided and convex along midline, without a longitudinal crease and with conspicuous golden setulae along posterior margin ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST7 about 3x as long as ST6, with a discal concavity near middle ( Fig. 56 View FIGURES 52–57 ); ST8 membranous and not very distinct; epiproct membranous, with two pairs of setae ( Lopes 1940: figs 35–36).
Distribution. Argentina (Misiones, Salta *); Brazil (Mato Grosso *, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul *, Santa Catarina).
Remarks. Udamopyga provecta is morphologically similar to U. percita and U. setigena . See remarks under U. percita .
VI |
Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute |
EX |
The Culture Collection of Extremophilic Fungi |
MNRJ |
Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal de Rio de Janeiro |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Udamopyga provecta ( Lopes, 1939 )
Santos, Josenilson Rodrigues Dos & Mello-Patiu, Cátia Antunes De 2018 |
Sarcophaga provecta
Lopes, H. S. 1939: 122 |