Komiyandra formosana ( Miwa and Mitono, 1939 ), 2010

Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi, 2010, Revision of Hawaiian, Australasian, Oriental, and Japanese Parandrinae (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae), Insecta Mundi 2010 (130), pp. 1-120 : 25-27

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5164485

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8400156

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/975887B7-FFC9-FFF5-66D0-F9D811573636

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Komiyandra formosana ( Miwa and Mitono, 1939 )
status

 

Komiyandra formosana ( Miwa and Mitono, 1939) View in CoL

( Fig. 34, 35 View Figure 1-44 , 95 View Figure 90-104 , 156, 157 View Figure 148-176 , 235 View Figure 235-251 , 278 View Figure 277-299 , 301, 306, 307 View Figure 300-314. 300-303 , 320 View Figure 317-322 , 413-415 View Figure 410-415 )

Parandra janus View in CoL ; Matsushita 1933: 161.

Parandra formosana Miwa and Mitono, 1939: 92 View in CoL ; Arigony 1984: 89; Hayashi et al. 1988: 166; Yu et al. 2002: 74, pl. 1, fig. 6a-6b.

Birandra (Birandra) formosana View in CoL ; Santos-Silva and Shute 2009: 32.

Description. Integument shining, dark-brown; parts of the head, mandibles, scape, margins of the pronotum, epipleura and elytral suture, and parts of the legs blackish.

Male ( Fig. 413 View Figure 410-415 ). Dorsal face of head, on the gibbosities, coarsely and moderately abundantly punctate; longitudinal depression between gibbosities smooth; area behind gibbosities with transverse region almost smooth, interrupted in middle by punctures as coarse as on the gibbosities, and with the same kind of punctures, somewhat sparse, between that region and the occiput; area between gibbosities and ocular carina distinctly depressed, and with some punctures at anterior part of that depression; area behind the area depressed, coarsely punctate (punctures partially confluent); area behind the eyes coarsely and sparsely punctate; ocular carina elevated, distinctly bifurcated in “Y” near the posterior edge of the eyes ( Fig. 413 View Figure 410-415 ); punctation behind bifurcation of ocular carina coarse and anastomosed. Eyes ( Fig. 95 View Figure 90-104 ) moderately narrow; posterior ocular edge ( Fig. 413 View Figure 410-415 ) distinct. Central area of clypeus almost vertical close to the front. Central projection of labrum ( Fig. 34 View Figure 1-44 ) wide, truncate at apex, and with a small triangular projection in its middle. Submentum depressed from middle to anterior edge; punctation moderately coarse and sparse; pilosity short and sparse (longer and more abundant towards anterior edge); anterior edge elevated throughout, more distinctly laterally. Mandibles approximately as long as head; teeth of inner margin ( Fig. 156 View Figure 148-176 ) placed around middle. Antennae reaching posterior angles of prothorax; ventral sensorial area of antennomeres III-XI not visible from side ( Fig. 235 View Figure 235-251 ), and not divided by carina; dorsal sensorial area of antennomere XI moderately small, narrow and elliptical.

Lateral margins of prothorax subparallel at anterior two-thirds towards anterior angles. Pronotum moderately finely and abundantly punctate at central region, gradually coarser laterally, mainly close to anterior angles; lateral area microsculptured, more distinctly close to anterior angles; anterior edge sinuous; anterior angles slightly projected forward; lateral angles not marked; posterior angles well marked. Basal two-thirds of elytra coarsely, abundantly punctate, mainly laterally on basal third and across medial third; punctation of apical third just finer, more abundant and concentrated; each elytron with two carinae well marked. Metasternum with punctures just coarse, moderately abundant laterally, gradually finer and sparser towards the metasternal suture. Metafemur moderately short. Dorsal face of metatibia slightly rounded at basal half, and slightly sulcate at apical half; in dorsal view moderately wide. Metatarsomere V (without claws) slightly longer than I-III together ( Fig. 278 View Figure 277-299 ); in dorsal view ( Fig. 301 View Figure 300-314. 300-303 ) distinctly enlarged at basal half.

Male genitalia: median lobe long, forming a flattened tube, with two elongate struts at base, apex widely rounded and distinctly incised at middle ( Fig. 307 View Figure 300-314. 300-303 ); parameres long, forming a ring, with a pair of pointed processes, separate near their base in dorsal view, apical lobes short and wide, stout relatively wide ( Fig. 306 View Figure 300-314. 300-303 ).

Female ( Fig. 415 View Figure 410-415 ). Head moderately narrow; dorsal face coarsely and abundantly punctate throughout. Central projection of labrum ( Fig. 35 View Figure 1-44 ) narrow and rounded at apex. Mandible ( Fig. 157 View Figure 148-176 ). Pronotum with punctation as in male, but microsculptured lateral area not evident; anterior angles more projected than in male; anterior edge sinuous. Antennae almost reaching posterior angles of prothorax. Metafemur ( Fig. 414 View Figure 410-415 ) moderately short.

Variability. Male and female: elytral carinae visible.

Dimensions in mm (M / F). Total length (including mandibles), 15.9-22.2/21.7; prothorax: length, 3.9- 4.6/4.4; anterior width, 4.6-5.8/5.6; posterior width, 3.8-4.5/4.7; humeral width, 4.6-6.0/6.3; elytral length, 10.4-12.6/13.5.

Geographical distribution. Taiwan.

Material examined. TAIWAN, Kaohsiung: Liukuei, M, IX.27.1984, W. L. Chen coll. ( HNCO) ; Mount Chuyunshan , M, VI.5.1999, Chen Changging coll. ( CCCO) ; M, V.2000, WenShing Lim coll. ( NOCO) ; Shanping , M, X.15.1988, C. L. Cen coll. ( HNCO) ; Taiyuan-shan, M, VIII.10.1987, W. C. Raw coll. ( HNCO). Nantou: Puli, M, (ex-Collection Hajime Yokoyama), V.1.1973 ( OMNH). Specimen examined through photographs taken by Dr. Mei-Ling Chan ( NMNS): TAIWAN, Kaohsiung: Shanping, F, 6-VII-1997, Z. A. Liao coll. ( NMNS) .

Types, type-localities. Two female syntypes from Taiwan (Bandaisya near Musya). Gressitt (1951) stated that Mitono’s Collection is deposited at TARI. However, Dr. Chi-Feng Lee (personal comm.) stated that he has not found the types of this species at TARI.

Comments. Miwa and Mitono (1939) recorded: “It may be regarded that this species agrees with the one reported from Formosa as P. janus , by A. Lameere”. However, Lameere (1902), when redescribing the species that he incorrectly believed to be P. janus , did not record it from Taiwan: “…provenant de la Nouvelle-Guinée occidentale (Hatam et Andai) et de Ternate, et ceux de Java …Bates la cite encore de Célèbes et van Lansberge de Céram”. It was only in Lameere (1912) that that author recorded Taiwan as a distribution area for P. janus : “M. Boppe m’en a communiqué um exemplaire de Formose”. Besides, Parandra janus sensu Lameere (1902) is not the species described by Bates, but instead, K. javana . Therefore, the redescription presented by that author does not correspond to K. janus or K. formosana . We believe that it is incorrect to affirm that K. formosana agrees with the species redescribed by Lameere (1902, 1912), although, probably, the species from Taiwan examined by Lameere corresponded to K. formosana .

Hayashi (1963) was the first to record Parandra formosana from the Ryukyu Islands based on a male from Omotodake (Ishigaki Island, Yayeyama Islands). We believe that K. formosana does not occur in the Ryukyu Islands, and that Hayashi was actually examining K. uenoi . Thus, K. formosana should be excluded from the Japanese fauna. Apparently, the misidentification of the male from the Ryukyu Islands is based on the elytral carinae that are well marked in both K. formosana and K. uenoi . The authors believe the distribution of K. formosana is restricted to Taiwan.

Samuelson and Gressitt (1965) followed the opinion of Hayashi (1963), and recorded K. formosana from “Ryukyus (Ishigaki)”. The key presented by those authors, to separate the species known from the Ryukyu Islands, correctly separates K. shibatai from K. uenoi (incorrectly pointed out as K. formosana ).

Komiyandra formosana differs from K. uenoi , mainly by the: head of female proportionally larger ( Fig. 415 View Figure 410-415 ); central projection of labrum of female narrow and rounded at apex ( Fig. 35 View Figure 1-44 ); metatibiae distinctly wider in dorsal view; metatarsomere V distinctly enlarged at basal half ( Fig. 301 View Figure 300-314. 300-303 ). In K. uenoi , the head of female is proportionally smaller ( Fig. 480 View Figure 474-480 ), central projection of labrum of female is truncate at apex ( Fig. 73 View Figure 45-74. 45-73 ), metatibiae are narrow in dorsal view, and metatarsomere V is not enlarged at basal half ( Fig. 303 View Figure 300-314. 300-303 ).

See comments on K. shibatai and K. lanyuana .

OMNH

Osaka Museum of Natural History

NMNS

National Museum of Natural Science

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Cerambycidae

Genus

Komiyandra

Loc

Komiyandra formosana ( Miwa and Mitono, 1939 )

Santos-Silva, Antonio, Heffern, Daniel & Matsuda, Kiyoshi 2010
2010
Loc

Birandra (Birandra) formosana

Santos-Silva, A. & S. Shute 2009: 32
2009
Loc

Parandra formosana

Yu S. - K. & H. Nara & Y. Chu 2002: 74
Hayashi, M. & S. Nakamura & H. Makihara & A. Saito & Y. Chu 1988: 166
Arigony, T. H. A. 1984: 89
Miwa, Y. & T. Mitono 1939: 92
1939
Loc

Parandra janus

Matsushita, M. 1933: 161
1933
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF