Savarna huahin Yao & Li, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4778.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5ACCAA9D-0C9B-4435-B665-15A0C79E2D6E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3856754 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/971C0A2A-FFD1-F47D-FF2A-E43FFC28B51E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Savarna huahin Yao & Li |
status |
sp. nov. |
Savarna huahin Yao & Li View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 5–6 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6
Type material. Holotype: ♂ (IZCAS-Ar39735), Laplae Cave and Kailone Cave (12°36’15.30”N, 99°43’20.46”E, elevation 175 m), Nong Phlap Subdistrict, Hua Hin District, Prachuap Kiri Khan, Thailand, 30 October 2014, P. Wongprom leg. GoogleMaps Paratypes: 1♂ (IZCAS-Ar39736), 2♀♀ (IZCAS-Ar39737–Ar39738), same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific name is a noun in apposition and refers to the type locality.
Diagnosis. This species resembles S. kaeo Huber, Petcharad & Bumrungsri, 2015 (see Huber et al. 2015b: 5, figs 2–4, 14–29, 36–37) with similar male chelicerae ( Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 ) and female epigynum ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ) but can be distinguished by large distal apophysis prolaterally (arrow in Fig. 5C View FIGURE 5 ) and short and wide, completely sclerotized distal apophysis retrolaterally (arrow in Fig. 5D View FIGURE 5 ) on procursus (prolateral apophysis small and retrolateral apophysis long and sclerotized only distally in S. kaeo ), small distal apophysis on embolus (arrow 1 in Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ; absence in S. kaeo ), and by presence of posteriorly constrictive vulval pore plates ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ; not distinctly constrictive posteriorly in S. kaeo ) and black marks on epigynal plate (arrow in Fig. 6H View FIGURE 6 ; absence of black marks medially in S. kaeo ).
Description. Male (holotype, IZCAS-Ar39735): Total length 2.31 (2.48 with clypeus), prosoma 0.90 long, 1.08 wide, opisthosoma 1.41 long, 1.06 wide. Leg I: 20.09 (5.13 + 0.39 + 5.02 + 7.71 + 1.84), leg II: 15.04 (4.09 + 0.38 + 3.88 + 5.53 + 1.16), leg III: 11.26 (3.32 + 0.36 + 2.74 + 4.03 + 0.81), leg IV: 14.75 (4.31 + 0.36 + 3.63 + 5.61 + 0.84); tibia I L/d: 45; leg formula: I-II-IV-III. Distance PME-PME 0.20, diameter PME 0.10, distance PME-ALE 0.04, AME absent. Sternum wider than long (0.72/0.54). Habitus as in Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 E–F. Dorsal shield of prosoma yellowish, with black marks laterally and narrow, dark median line behind ocular area; ocular area, clypeus and sternum black; Legs brown, but slightly whitish on distal parts of femora and tibiae, with darker rings on subdistal parts of femora and tibiae. Opisthosoma yellowish, with black subcuticular spots lying above deeper white spots dorsally and laterally and distinct ventral pattern consisting of three interconnected black marks. Ocular area elevated, each eye triad on top of short, laterally directed hump. Thoracic furrow deep. Clypeus with pair of rounded processes at rim furnished with strong and long hairs. Chelicerae as in Fig. 6D View FIGURE 6 , with pair of proximo-lateral apophyses. Palps as in Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 A–B, trochanter with small dorsal apophysis (arrow in Fig. 5B View FIGURE 5 ) and long ventral apophysis proximally attached to femur; procursus simple proximally but complex distally, with two sclerotized distal apophyses (arrows in Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 C–D), long subdistal apophysis ventrally and very large distal apophysis dorsally; bulb ( Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ) with proximal sclerite and sclerotized embolus (provided with small distal apophysis, arrow 1 in Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ) apparently containing sperm duct (sperm duct opening visible, arrow 2 in Fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ). Retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia I at 4% proximally; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia I, present on other tibiae; legs with short spines in single ventral rows on femur I and tibiae I–III, with vertical hairs in higher than usual density on all tibiae, without curved hairs; tarsus I with 13 distinct pseudosegments.
Female (paratype, IZCAS-Ar39737): Similar to male, habitus as in Figs 6 View FIGURE 6 G–H. Total length 2.16 (2.34 with clypeus), prosoma 0.68 long, 0.90 wide, opisthosoma 1.48 long, 1.06 wide. Leg I: 16.23 (4.56 + 0.37 + 4.41 + 4.98 + 1.91), leg II: 11.87 (3.61 + 0.32 + 2.83 + 4.01 + 1.10), leg III: 8.33 (2.44 + 0.30 + 1.93 + 2.91 + 0.75), leg IV missing (see variation); tibia I L/d: 40. Distance PME-PME 0.13, diameter PME 0.10, distance PME-ALE 0.04, AME absent. Sternum slightly wider than long (0.62/0.52). Clypeus unmodified. Epigynum ( Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ) slightly protruding, with pair of large humps laterally (arrows in Fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ). Vulva ( Fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ) with curved anterior arch and pair of anteriorly wide and posteriorly narrow, long pore plates.
Variation: Tibia I in male paratype (IZCAS-Ar39736): 5.50. Tibia I in another female paratype (IZCAS- Ar39738): 6.98, leg IV: 12.49 (3.90 + 0.33 + 2.90 + 4.55 + 0.81).
Natural history. The species was found in the twilight zone of the Laplae Cave and Kailone Cave (karst area).
Distribution. Known from the two very close type localities ( Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.