Dorcadion (Crubridorcadion) invicinum Pic, 1902
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.25221/fee.422.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7C62934B-FFCF-4CF0-A1BC-16084E878578 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/96600610-FFCF-FFFE-55AE-35768FC7AA10 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dorcadion (Crubridorcadion) invicinum Pic, 1902 |
status |
|
Dorcadion (Crubridorcadion) invicinum Pic, 1902 View in CoL , stat. resurr.
Figs 4, 5 View Figs 1–9
Dorcadion invicinum Pic, 1902b: 93 View in CoL (type locality: “ Turquie d’Asie : Diarbekir ”).
Dorcadion (Pedestredorcadion) cingulatum: Breuning, 1958: 30 View in CoL (part., including m.
persianum Breun. View in CoL = m. nigrobivittatum Breun.; m. invicinum Pic, 1902b View in CoL ); Breuning, 1962:
465 (part., including m. persianum Breun. = m. nigrobivittatum Breun.; m. invicinum Pic ).
Dorcadion (Autodorcadion) cingulatum: Plavilstshikov, 1958: 196 View in CoL (part., including ab.
nigrobivittatum Breun.).
Pedestredorcaduon cingulatum: Villiers, 1967: 365 View in CoL (part.).
Dorcadion cingulatum: Danilevsky, 1998: 49 View in CoL .
Dorcadion (Cribridorcadion) cingulatum: Danilevsky, 2010a: 245 View in CoL (part., including invicinum Pic, 1902b View in CoL = persianum Breuning, 1943 View in CoL ); Bernhauer, 2015: 13, Abb. 14-16.
MATERIAL EXAMINED. Iran: Āzarbāyjān-e Gharbī, Jaldian env., Nagadeh , h= 1500 m ,
16.4.1996, 3 ♂, 1 ♀, leg. W. Heinz [ MD]; Iran: Āzarbāyjān-e Gharbī, Pass zw. Mahabad u .
Pasweh, h= 1400–2000 m, 16.4.1991, 5 ♂, leg. W. Heinz [ MD]; Iran: Āzarbāyjān-e Gharbī ,
pass 16 km SWW Nagadeh (S Orumiye), 16.4.2002, 3 ♂, 2 ♀, leg. P. Kabatek [ MD] .
DESCRIPTION. Body length of available males 9.5–12.3 mm; body length of available females 10.8–13.1 mm. Body relatively small.
Antennae more or less red with darkened apical joints, sometimes rather dark with reddish
1st joint.
Prothorax usually with obliterated lateral spines; pronotum often poorly pubescent,
sometimes nearly glabrous in fresh specimens, in males pronotal punctation never totally hiding by pubescence; dorsal ground pubescence in males black, in females – brown (darker or lighter); narrow white central pronotal line always distinct.
plyushchi Danilevsky et Skrylnik , sp. n. 10 – holotype, male; 11– paratype, male; 12 –
paratype, female; 13 – Phytoecia (Musaria) faldermanni m. blessigi, male [ Armenia,
Goravan, 24.5.1999, M. Kalashyan leg.]; 14 – biotope of Cortodera kukinae Danilevsky et
Skrylnik, sp. n. in Tehran province; 15 – Euphorbia sp. , a food plant of C. kukinae , 16 –
female of C. kukinae on the food plant.
Elytra in males with even black pubescence, without velvety black longitudinal stripes,
but sometimes with small brownish apical areas; elytra in females brown with a pair of very contrast velvety black irregular dorsal stripes, many times interrupted; sometimes short parts of dorsal black stripes can be replaced by fine white pubescence; humeral white stripes with or without numerous black spots.
Legs red (darker or lighter).
DISTRIBUTION. As far as Iranian populations are conditionally accepted here as being conspecific to Turkish Diarbekir population following a generally accepted opinion by Breuning (1958, 1962), the species can be distributed along eastern Anatolia to Iranian border.
Four localities are definitely known in North-West Iran in south-west of Āzarbāyjān-e Gharbī province: Jaldian env., Nagadeh , 1500 m (about 36°51'42"N, 45° 8'47"E), Pass zw. Mahabad u. Pasweh, 1400–2000 m (about 36°44'30"N, 45°31'59"E), pass 16km SWW Nagadeh GoogleMaps
(about 36°54'15"N 45°12'50"E), Piranshahr environs (about 36°41'28"N, 45°6'43"E) ( Fig. View Fig
21, 14–17 View Figs 10–16 View Figs 17–20 ).
REMARKS. The species is very close to Dorcadion cingulatum and represents its northern vicariant. A species with even black elytral pubescence (without velvety black dorsal stripes)
distributed in Āzarbāyjān-e Gharbī was wrongly accepted by Bernhauer (2015, though the locality of depicted specimens was not published here) as D. cingulatum . That incorrect conception was shown by several internet publications (Danilevsky, 2011; Kasatkin, 2015;
Hoskovec et al., 2020). No correct names were proposed for those populations. I don’t like to describe this form as a new species now, as the status of the nearest Turkish population traditionally attributed to D. cingulatum is not clear. It was described as D. invicinum Pic,
1902b on the base of a single female from Diarbekir. Now I provisionally attribute the name
D. invicinum Pic , stat. ressur. to the populations from Āzarbāyjān-e Gharbī.
Dorcadion kharpuensis Danilevsky, 1998 (described from Gilan; Fig. 21 View Fig , 18 View Figs 17–20 ) was compared with “ D. cingulatum ” from Āzarbāyjān-e Gharbī in the original description. So, in fact it was compared with D. invicinum . But D. kharpuensis differs from both D. cingulatum and
D. invicinum by glabrous shining pronotum in males. So, D. kharpuensis is close to neighbor
D. cingulatoides Breuning, 1946 distributed in Mazandaran ( Fig. 21 View Fig , 20 View Figs 17–20 –26), but latter is usually bigger and wider, with usually red prothorax and head, thicker antennae.
MD |
Museum Donaueschingen |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Dorcadion (Crubridorcadion) invicinum Pic, 1902
Danilevsky, M. L. & Skrylnik, Yu. E. 2021 |
Dorcadion (Cribridorcadion) cingulatum
: Danilevsky 2010: 245 |
Dorcadion cingulatum:
Danilevsky 1998: 49 |
cingulatum:
Villiers 1967: 365 |
Dorcadion (Pedestredorcadion) cingulatum
: Breuning 1958: 30 |
Dorcadion (Autodorcadion) cingulatum
: Plavilstshikov 1958: 196 |
persianum Breun.
Breuning 1943 |
persianum
Breuning 1943 |
Dorcadion invicinum
Pic 1902: 93 |
invicinum
Pic 1902 |
invicinum
Pic 1902 |