Scelidocteus incisus ( Tullgren, 1910 ) Zonstein & Marusik, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.26107/RBZ-2020-0010 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6533FC4C-8451-4309-BA10-C0502C26D2EB |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/964E87BD-FFB8-C318-FC95-F86829D3F791 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Scelidocteus incisus ( Tullgren, 1910 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Scelidocteus incisus ( Tullgren, 1910) View in CoL , new combination
( Fig. 7 View Fig A–G)
Boagrius incisus Tullgren, 1910:112 View in CoL , pl. 1 fig. 28a–g (male, female).
Lectotype. Male (designated here), TANZANIA: SW Mt Kilimanjaro, Kibongoto (“Kibongo”, as labelled; 3°11′S, 37°06′E), 1,000–1,200 m, June 1905, Y. Sjöstedt ( RMS; examined). GoogleMaps
Paralectotype. 1 female (designated here), same collecting data ( MNB 13846; examined) .
Notes. This species, originally placed in Boagrius , possesses many characters which are dissimilar to those observed in B. pumilus and B. simoni , new species. Tullgren (1910) mentioned the type series of B. incisus consisting of seven adult and non-adult females, and one adult male. However, only one adult female and the above-noted male have been located. Although Tullgren (1910) described one of the syntype females first, we prefer to choose the conspecific syntype male to designate as the lectotype. This male was obviously used in the original description, while the same cannot be claimed regarding the only available female. The examination of both these type specimens revealed that this East African taxon, when compared with the South-Eastern Asian Boagrius spp., differs from them by: a) a considerably larger body size (TL 6.9–7.8 vs. 2.1–2.8 mm); b) the presence of a slit-like (not a bipartite) thoracic fovea; c) femur I considerably swollen in both sexes (vs. an almost unmodified one); d) corrugated (not smooth) segments of leg I, at least in the male; e) dense leg scopula (vs. a poorly developed one); and f) the configuration of the male copulatory organs possessing accessory structures twisting around each other (see Fig. 7 View Fig A–G). According to the listed characters, this African species can be considered as belonging to the purely African chedimine genus Scelidocteus Simon, 1907 . Hence, we place this species in the latter genus as S. incisus ( Tullgren, 1910) , new combination. Its further position will be specified in the course of a planned revision of Scelidocteus .
RMS |
University of Wyoming |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Scelidocteus incisus ( Tullgren, 1910 )
Zonstein, Sergei L. & Marusik, Yuri M. 2020 |
B. simoni
Zonstein & Marusik 2020 |
Boagrius incisus
Tullgren 1910: 112 |
Boagrius pumilus
Simon 1893 |