Blumea stricta (DC.) Anderb. & Bengtson, 2022
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.52.52306 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9633715F-FFF0-F84D-FC9F-FAA4FDD5DD5C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Blumea stricta (DC.) Anderb. & Bengtson |
status |
comb. nov. |
Blumea stricta (DC.) Anderb. & Bengtson View in CoL , comb. nov.
≡ Cyathocline stricta DC., Prodr. 5: 374. 1836. – Lecto-
type (designated by Fayed 1979: 514): “342. Tanacetum viscosum Wall. in herb. F. Artemisia stricta herb. Heyne”
(G-DC G00452565); isolectotype: Herb. Heyne in Herb .
Wallich, Kew no. 3232.F (K-W K001118872).
= Tanacetum purpureum Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don, Prodr. Fl. Nepal.: 181. 1825 ≡ Cyathocline purpurea (Buch.- Ham. ex D. Don) Kuntze, Revis. Gen. Pl. View in CoL 1: 333. 1891 ≡ Blumea purpurea (Buch.-Ham. ex D. Don) W. P. Li View in CoL in Pl. Syst. Evol. 300: 603. 2013, nom. illeg. [non Blumea purpurea DC., Prodr. 5: 443. 1836]. – Type: according to the protologue, the species was collect- ed by Hamilton in Nepal, but no specimens could be traced .
= Cyathocline lyrata Cass. View in CoL in Ann. Sci. Nat. (Paris) 17: 420. 1829 [non Blumea lyrata (Kunth) V. M. Badillo View in CoL in Bol. Soc. Venez. Ci. Nat. 10: 257. 1946]. – Type: according to the protologue, only a few capitula were collected by Reynaud from Pégu (Bago, Myanmar), but no specimens could be traced .
–
– “ Tanacetum viscosum Wall. ” Wallich, Numer. List: no. 3232. 1831, nom. inval., nom. nud.
“ Tanacetum gratum Wall. ” Candolle, Prodr. 5: 374. 1836, nom. inval., pro syn.
F |
Field Museum of Natural History, Botany Department |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Blumea stricta (DC.) Anderb. & Bengtson
Anderberg, Arne A. & Bengtson, Annika 2022 |
Cyathocline lyrata
V. M. Badillo 1946: 257 |
Cass. 1829: 420 |