Foza Reed and Cumberlidge, 2006
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2022.2049389 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6762513 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9529DB19-FFF8-FFB6-3ACF-FB1EFED28C74 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Foza Reed and Cumberlidge, 2006 |
status |
|
Foza Reed and Cumberlidge, 2006
( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (a–l); Tables 1–4 View Table 1 View Table 2 View Table 3 )
Foza Reed and Cumberlidge, 2006: 59–60 , figs 1, 2.
Foza – Cumberlidge and Meyer 2009:78 View Cited Treatment (name only) (not Foza Reed and Cumberlidge,2006 ). Foza – Cumberlidge et al. 2015: 3 View Cited Treatment (partim).
Foza – Cumberlidge et al. 2020: 586 (name only).
Foza – Cumberlidge et al. 2021: 5 (name only) (partim).
Type species
Foza raimundi Reed and Cumberlidge, 2006 , by original designation.
Rediagnosis
Carapace front conspicuously narrow (FW/CW = 0.24–0.25), sharply deflexed; carapace extremely high ( CH /FW = 0.48) ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (b)); lateral margin of carapace curved evenly outward, lined with small granules, continuous with posterolateral margin; postfrontal crest faint to absent, postorbital crests lacking, epigastric crests faint, positioned forward on front almost touching frontal margin; deep mid-groove between epigastric crests forked posteriorly; distinct notch between the exorbital, epibranchial teeth ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (a)); branchiostegite pterygostomial region with broad area of dense setae, suborbital, subhepatic regions smooth (except for carinae near posterolateral margin) ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (b)); eyestalks, cornea, normal size ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (b)); mandibular palp terminal article bilobed, anterior lobe on terminal article conspicuous, large-sized (MPAL/MPTA = 0.6) ( Table 2 View Table 2 ); exopod of third maxilliped reaching lower half of merus; exopod with short flagellum (less than, or equal to, merus length); ischium with faint vertical sulcus curving distally towards medial margin ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (b)); ambulatory legs (P2–5) long (ΣP2–5/ CW = 7.3) Table 3 View Table 3 ); anterior sterno-pleonal cavity lined with short setae; sternal sulcus S1/2 short, very faint; S2/3 completely crossing sternum; S3/4 V-shaped, deepest at edges, faint in middle; episternal sulci S4/E4, S5/E5, S6/E6, S7/E7 absent, smooth; S4/5 meeting PL6/telson; S6/7 meeting PL6 one-quarter of segment length from PL6/5 ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (c)); male pleon slim, triangular, tapered, widest at PL3; telson outline forming straight-sided triangle with broad base, rounded apex ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (c)); G1 TA short (G1 TA/ SA = 0.25), straight, broadly conical, tip wide ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (g)); G2 TA extremely long (length G2 TA either subequal, or greater than G2 SA), G2 TA tip with distinct distal curve ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (i)).
Distribution
The revision of Foza restricts its distributional range to three locations, all in the Antsiranana Province in northern Madagascar: two in the Diana Region (the Montagne des Francais Reserve and the Ankarana Special Reserve), and one in the Sava Region ( Marojejy National Park). The humid forested slopes of Mount Marojejy in the Marojejy National Park are the most northerly extent of the continuous eastern rainforests in Madagascar, while the other two localities are in dry deciduous and riverine forest that is part of a limestone plateau with tsingy and numerous caves and canyons. The range of the revised Foza does not now include any localities farther south than this (e.g. in Toamasina Province) ( Figure 6 View Figure 6 ).
Species included
Foza raimundi Reed and Cumberlidge, 2006 and Foza manonae Cumberlidge, Klaus, Meyer, and Koppin, 2015 .
Remarks
The removal from Foza of A. goudoti (by Cumberlidge et al. 2020) and V. ambohitra (present work) leaves this genus with two species, F. raimundi and F. manonae . The revised genus diagnosis provided here distinguishes Foza from the other Malagasy freshwater crab genera.
Foza manonae sp. nov. was assigned to Foza on the basis of characters that it shares with F. raimundi . These include a conspicuously bilobed mandibular palp ( Cumberlidge et al. 2015, fig. 2e,f), a faint postfrontal crest ( Cumberlidge et al. 2015, fig. 1a,b), a sternal groove S6/7 that meets the margin of PL 5 in the middle of the article ( Cumberlidge et al. 2015, fig. 2d), and a curved, elongated G2 TA that is curved inward distally ( Cumberlidge et al. 2015, fig. 2a). Molecular evidence that may guide the decision to continue to group F. manonae in the same genus as F. raimundi is not currently available (except for a preliminary, unpublished DNA comparison of 16S rRNA sequences of F. manonae with other Malagasy freshwater crab taxa that placed it in a separate clade from F. raimundi ).
For the time being, F. manonae is retained in Foza , but we are aware of a number of characters of the carapace, thoracic sternum and gonopods ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (d–f,j–l)) that distinguish it from F. raimundi ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (a–c,g–i)), the type species of the genus ( Reed and Cumberlidge 2006). For example, the G1 TA is short and slender, and glabrous on the dorsal side, in F. manonae ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (k)), vs short and stout, and heavily setose on the dorsal side, in F. raimundi ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (h)); the S3/4 is glabrous, incomplete, and only visible as two short lateral depressions in F. manonae ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (f)), vs a heavily setose and complete S3/4 that traverses the thoracic sternum in F. raimundi ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (c)); the carapace lateral margin is strongly convex in F. manonae ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (d)), vs a weakly convex carapace lateral margin in F. raimundi ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (a)); the ambulatory legs (P2–5) are short (ΣP2–5/CW = 4.7) in F. manonae ( Table 3 View Table 3 ), v ersus ambulatory legs (P2–5) that are long (ΣP2–5/CW = 7.3) in F. raimundi ( Table 3 View Table 3 ); and the telson has gently sinuous lateral margins in F. manonae ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (c)), vs a telson with straight lateral margins ( Figure 7 View Figure 7 (f)).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Foza Reed and Cumberlidge, 2006
Leever, Ellen M., Daniels, Savel R., Soma, Julia B. & Cumberlidge, Neil 2022 |
Foza
Cumberlidge N & Soma J & Leever EM & Clark PF & Daniels SR 2021: 5 |
Foza
Cumberlidge N & Soma JB & Leever EM & Daniels SR 2020: 586 |
Foza
Reed SK & Cumberlidge N 2006: 60 |