Dicotylophyllum sp. 5
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.4202/app.2011.0024 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/922F3E29-556F-FFA0-FF34-67FFFEA7FB38 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dicotylophyllum sp. 5 |
status |
|
Fig. 6C.
1907 Fagus prisca Ettingsh. (?); Nowak 1907a: 49, pl. 1: 2.
non 1962 Fagus cf. prisca Ett. ; Cieśliński and Milaković 1962: 254, pl. 3: 1.
Material.—A subcomplete leaf JS 8 from Krasnobród, a fragmentary leaf from Chełmowa Góra KrS 2, a fragment L PB−K.18 (formerly 153) from Potelych.
Description.—Blade attachment marginal, laminar size notophyll (the blade is 7 cm long and 5 cm wide), blade medially slightly asymmetric, basally symmetric. Base shape convex, angle obtuse. Margin probably entire. Venation pinnate, secondaries straight for about half of the blade width, then poorly preserved, eucamptodromous?; their attachment excurrent, angle constant, about 50 °, spacing regular. Tertiaries not preserved.
Remarks.— Dicotylophyllum sp. 5 differs from other taxa described herein under the generic name Dicotylophyllum in smaller length to width ratio (and from Dicotylophyllum sp. 4 moreover in distinct secondary venation). Once again, it is not excluded that this morphotype does not represent a separate biologic species.
The fragmentary leaf of “ Magnolia polysperma Karczmarz, 1966 ” (MZ VII/37/31, Karczmarz and Popiel 1966: fig. 3; refigured by Kohlman−Adamska 1975: pl. 1: 1) might represent either Dicotylophyllum sp. 4 or Dicotylophyllum sp. 5 . For the status of this name and of Fagus cf. prisca sensu Cieśliński and Milaković (1962) see below, under Unidentified taxa.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Genus |
Dicotylophyllum sp. 5
Halamski, Adam T. 2013 |
Fagus prisca
Nowak, J. 1907: 49 |