Ectateus calcaripes (Gebien, 1904) Gebien, 1904
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.415.6406 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:372DF48D-D163-4742-AABF-5D7E4913050C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F724204-5FDB-A385-A726-9FC6EFEE6E5B |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Ectateus calcaripes (Gebien, 1904) |
status |
comb. n. |
Ectateus calcaripes (Gebien, 1904) comb. n. Figs 3, 20, 27, 31, 41, 45
Selinus calcaripes Gebien, 1904: 3. - Gebien 1910: 277, 1938: 297; Koch 1956: 238; Kulzer 1963: 425, Iwan 2002b: 265.
Notes.
The types of Selinus calcaripes seems to be lost. According to the information provided by Iwan (2002b) they should be deposited in Naturhistorisches Museum collection (Basel, Switzerland). Unfortunately, the curators do not confirm this statement. Additionally, during the preparation of my recent scientific project - Phylogeny, biogeography and generic classification of the Ectateus generic group ( Coleoptera : Tenebrionidae : Platynotina ) - I have studied diverse entomological material concerning the subtribe Platynotina from several collections across the World and I did not menaged to locate these specimens.
Based only on the original species descriptions Koch (1956) proposed to consider Selinus calcaripes as a synonym of Ectateus curtulus (Fairmaire, 1893). Unfortunately, the morphology of the holotype of Ectateus curtulus (damaged female - Fig. 47) do not correspond to Gebien’s (1904) description of Selinus calcaripes and Koch’s (1956) interpretation of Ectateus curtulus . Both publications refer rather to a morphological form that is very closely to Ectateus modestus and differers from it mainly by the structure of male protibiae (Figs 31-32). A consistent to the above mentioned descriptions morph was found in the studied material. It was included in the cladistic analysis as Selinus calcaripes .
The results of a cladistic analysis confirmed the aforementioned assumption that Ectateus curtulus and Selinus calcaripes represent two distinct morphological forms (Fig. 25). They can be easily distinguished by the structure of head (char. 3, 5), pronotum (char. 9) and elytra (elytral intervals with conspicuous punctures in Ectateus curtulus ). Additionally, the results shows that Selinus calcaripes is very closely related to Ectateus modestus - which is consistent with Gebien’s (1904) description and Koch’s (1956) interpretation.
Taking into consideration the difficulties associated with Selinus calcaripes I propose to designate a neotype to clarify the taxonomic status of this species. Additionally, on the basis of the results of a cladistic analysis I propose to treat this taxon as a independent species - not as a synonym of Ectateus curtulus .
Studied material.
Neotype designated here, male (MNHN): "Rep. Centrafric., La Maboke, 2.IX.1967, L. Matile rec.". Other material: male (MNHN): “Musée du Congo, Haut-Uele: Yebo moto, VII-1926, L. Burgeon", male (MRAC): “Musée du Congo, Haut-Uele: Yebo moto, V-1926, L. Burgeon", male (MRAC): “Musée du Congo, Bambesa, 15-X-1933, J. V. Leroy", male and 3 females (MRAC): "Coll. Mus. Tervuren, Oubanghi-Chari: Bangui I/III.1968, ex. coll. Breuning", male and female (RBINS): "R.I.Sc.Nat. Belg.,I.G. 16.364", 4 females (MNHN): "Calcaripes, Geb., det. Dr. Kaszab", male and female (MNHN): "Boukoko, Rep. Centr Afric.", male and female (MNHN): "La Maboke, Rep. Centr Afric.", 2 males and female (MNHN): “Lamaboké, 10.XI.1965", male and female (MNHN): “Lamaboké, 20-21.XI.1966", male (MNHN): “Lamaboké, 18.XI.1965", 2 females (HNHM): "Cameroon, Dja Reserve, Ekom, 21-26.XII. 1996, G. Hácz & G. Köszegi”, 3 males (MNB): "Kamerun Buea, 1-7.III.1912, v. Rothkirch S.G.", female (MNB): "Kamerun, Brea 1000m, 2. - 7. III- 1912; v. Rothkirch S.G.", female (MNB): "Kamerun, Soppo 25. II. 1912, v. Rothkirch S.G.", 2 males (MNHN): “Lamaboké, Rep. Centrafric., V-1964, J. Carayon", female (MNHN): "1968-69, La Maboké, Rép. Centre Afr., P. Teochhi leg.", male (MNHN): "21.VIII.1969, La Maboké, Rép. Centre Afr., P. Teochhi leg.", female (RBINS): "Coll. R. I. Sc. N. B., congo belge Beni, crottes d’ éléphants, 18-I-1952 Ch. Verbeke", female (MNHN): “Muséum Paris, La Maboké, Rép. Centrafric.", male (MRAC): “Musée du Congo, Région de Sassa, 1895-96, Colmant", male and female (MNHN): "Cameroun, Dr. G. Nonveiller", female (MNHN): “Muséum Paris, Congo Moyen, Rég. de M`Baiki, (D Fidao), Pitard 1919", male (MNHN): "Uganda Prot., Mabira Forest, Chagwe., 3,500-3,800 ft.", female (MNHN): "Uganda, Nimuli to, Murchison Falls", male (MNB): "Neu-Kamerun, No. 3360-71, Tessmann S.G."
Redescription.
Habitus as in Fig. 45. Body length = 11.5-14.0 mm. Elytra wider and longer than pronotum (width ratio elytra / pronotum = 1.1-1.2; length ratio elytra / the middle of pronotum = 2.4-2.6).
Dorsal side of head dull, with punctures (the intervals between the punctures are smaller than the diameter of the puncture). Frontoclypeal suture coarse. Clypeal emargination relatively deep (clypeal emargination width / depth ratio = 8.0-8.6). Mentum with median part narrow. Submentum with short base. Maxillary palp not widened (width of maxillary palp / length of 3rd antennomere = 1.0-1.1). Length of antennae greater than pronotal length (ratio antenna / pronotum from tip of anterior pronotal angle to tip of posterior pronotal angle = 1.1-1.2). 3rd antennomere relatively long (length ratio of antennomere 3rd / 2nd = 2.8-3.0).
Pronotal disc transverse (middle of pronotum length / width ratio = 0.4-0.5); dull, with coarse punctures (the intervals between the punctures are smaller than the diameter of the puncture). Anterior pronotal angles sharp and protruding outwards. Lateral margins of pronotal disc sinusoidal. Apophyseal and basal depressions on pronotal disc present; apophyseal depressions rounded. Pronotal hypomera dull; without punctures.
Elytra oblong (elytra length / width ratio = 1.1-1.2). Elytral striae with fine punctures; intervals non-convex, with transverse sculpture (Fig. 27). Elytral base slightly rounded. Elytral humeri rounded, not protruding laterad. Wings absent. Scutellum triangular; situated in a depression.
Intercoxal process protruding towards mesoventrite; peaked at the apex. Metaventrite reduced (length ratio cavity of hind coxa / metaventrite between the insertions of mid and hind coxae ca. 2). In both sexes abdominal process without tubercles; relatively narrow (process of 1st abdominal ventrite / process of metaventrite = 2.1-2.2). 5th abdominal ventrite without bordering; punctures fine (the intervals between the punctures are greater than the 2 diameters of the puncture).
Male legs. Protarsi slightly narrow. Protibiae as in Fig. 31. Mesotibiae and mesofemorae with large denticle. Metafemorae with an hair fringe. Female legs simple.
Male genitalia. Parameres narrowest in the half of their length; length equal to the 0.2 of the rest of aedeagal tegmen (Fig. 20). Clavae hook-shaped (Fig. 20). Female genitalia. Paraproct equal to coxites. Bursa copulatrix with a sclerite in the distal part. Spermatheca with narrow ducts.
Distribution.
This species has been collected in the following ecoregions of Central Africa (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, South Sudan): Atlantic Equatorial coastal forests, East Sudanian savanna, Mount Cameroon and Bioko montane forests, Northeastern Congolian lowland forests, Northwestern Congolian lowland forests (Fig. 41).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.