Sarasinula plebeia ( Fischer, 1868 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11606/1807-0205/2020.60.47 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F2E8799-F823-3D0F-FF1A-FA7069A0D4EF |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Sarasinula plebeia ( Fischer, 1868 ) |
status |
|
Sarasinula plebeia ( Fischer, 1868) View in CoL
Vaginulus plebeius Fischer, 1868: 145-146 View in CoL ; Thomé,
1971: 34-36. Vaginula andreana Semper, 1885: 321 View in CoL . Vaginula behnii Semper, 1885: 310-311 . Vaginula dubia Semper,1885:296 View in CoL ; Thomé, 1972:252-253. Veronicella hedleyi Simroth, 1889: 552 View in CoL ; Simroth,
1891: 863-906; Simroth, 1918: 281-292. Vaginula levucana Simroth, 1918: 262-290 . Vaginula samoana Simroth, 1918: 290-291 . Vaginula tahitiana Simroth, 1918: 290-292 . Sarasinula plebeja Grimpe& Hoffmann,1924:177 ; Grimpe
& Hoffmann, 1925a: 19-26; Grimpe & Hoffmann,
1925b: 357-362; Hoffmann, 1925: 190, 251-252;
Thomé, 1975: 25-27. Imerinia plebeja Baker, 1925 ; Hoffmann, 1934: 259-260. Veronicela discrepans Thiele, 1927: 328. Sarasinula lemei Thomé, 1967: 528-531 . Vaginulus (Sarasinula) plebeius Forcart, 1969: 149-150 ;
Aguayo, 1964; Forcart, 1973; Cowie, 1998.
Sarasinula dubia Thomé,1993:71 View in CoL ; Thomé et al., 1997: 530; Simone, 2006: 96; Agudo-Padrón, 2008: 153.
Vaginula plebeia Cowie, 1997: 38 View in CoL .
Sarasinula plebeia Thomé, 1975: 25-27 View in CoL ; Thomé, 1989: 19-23; Thomé, 1993: 71; Thomé et al., 1997: 530; Gomes & Thomé, 2001: 141-143; Gomes & Thomé, 2002; Gomes & Thomé, 2004: 591; Simone, 2006: 97; Agudo-Padrón, 2008: 153.
Material examined: Puerto Iguazú , Misiones province (25°36′39″S, 54°34′49″W), March 2011, N = 1, MLP-Ma 15015 GoogleMaps ; Selvas del Río de Oro, Chaco province (26°45′09″S, 58°58′30″W), July 2000, N = 1, MLP-Ma 15016 GoogleMaps .
Description ( Fig. 1 View Figure 1 ): Thickened notum that sometimes appears dotted ( Fig. 1A View Figure 1 ); light brown to dark coloration without pale stripes. The tentacles are contracted and hidden underneath the notum when the slug is dormant. Penis ( Fig.1C View Figure 1 ) short,smooth, without annular protrusion, bilaterally symmetrical, with an enlarged glans. There is no spatha. Digitiform gland (= penial gland, Fig. 1B View Figure 1 ) with an elongated papilla with 6 short tubules with varying lengths (not bifurcate). Proximal region of the tubules meandering and covered by a thick membrane. The width to length ratio of the papilla is 2.33, and the width to length ratio of the glans is 1.52. Copulation bursa (or spermatheca) formed by a globular and thin sac seat- ed over a thick cylindrical uniform duct, which narrows slightly until it penetrates the integument, where it joins the oviduct, opening in the female genital pore. Canalis junctor (or junctor duct) thin and short, penetrating the narrowest part of the copulation bursa itself.The rectum penetrates the integument near the female genital pore, located near the middle of the right hyponotum.The two nerve pairs,pedal and pallial, originate in their respective ganglia in the periesophageal ring and stretch through the body cavity in two sets, right and left, which runs together from the nerve ganglion to the posterior end of the body, centrally along the foot.The pairs leave a small anterior space for the passage of the main artery (fide Grimpe & Hoffmann, 1925b).
Ecological notes: Both new records were found in residential gardens, under branches and trunks, so it is inferred that the trade-in plants are the pathway of dispersal of this species. The Selvas del Río de Oro locality corresponds to the Humid Chaco terrestrial ecoregion (humid temperate climate), while Puerto Iguazú locality corresponds to the Alto Paraná Atlantic Forest ecoregion (subtropical climate), ecoregions defined by Olson & Dinerstein (2002). Both records are the first to be cited for these terrestrial ecoregions ( Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ).
Distribution in South America ( Fig. 2 View Figure 2 ): Argentina: Misiones and Chaco provinces (This study). Brazil: States of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Espírito Santo, Bahia, Pará (Santarém), Paraíba, and Ceará ( Thomé, 1993; Mansur & Thomé, 1994; Thomé et al., 1997; Simone, 2006; Agudo-Padrón, 2008; GBIF, 2020). Colombia: Departments of Risaralda (Pereira),
Atlantico (Barranquilla), Valle del Cauca (Palmira) Antioquía (San NicolasValley),and Caldas.( Götting, 1978; GBIF, 2020). Andina región ( Constantino et al., 2010). Ecuador:Provinces of Zamora and Pichincha (GBIF,2020). Peru: Departments of Lambayeque and Loreto (Iquitos) (GBIF, 2020). Venezuela: States of Anzoátegui (San Tome), Aragua, Caracas (Campo Alegre), Mérida, Miranda (El Hatillo), Monagas, Sucre, and Táchira, ( Fernández de Varela, 1982; Thomé et al., 1997; GBIF, 2020).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Sarasinula plebeia ( Fischer, 1868 )
Daglio, Eduardo Daniel, Lucía, Micaela de, Gomes, Suzete Rodrigues & Gregoric, Diego Eduardo Gutiérrez 2020 |
Sarasinula dubia Thomé,1993:71
Agudo-Padron, A. I. 2008: 153 |
Simone, L. R. L. D. 2006: 96 |
Thome, J. W. & dosSantos, P. H. & Pedott, L. 1997: 530 |
Vaginula plebeia
Cowie, R. H. 1997: 38 |
Sarasinula plebeia Thomé, 1975: 25-27
Agudo-Padron, A. I. 2008: 153 |
Simone, L. R. L. D. 2006: 97 |
Gomes, S. R. & Thome, J. W. 2004: 591 |
Gomes, S. R. & Thome, J. W. 2001: 141 |
Thome, J. W. & dosSantos, P. H. & Pedott, L. 1997: 530 |
Thome, J. W. 1993: 71 |
Thome, J. W. 1989: 19 |
Thome, J. W. 1975: 27 |
Vaginulus plebeius
Fischer, P. 1868: 146 |