Panjange marilog Huber
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2015.169 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BB0E51AB-C0E6-4054-AFED-939D14BD1EFB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6095783 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0B086DBA-DB8C-4253-AB9C-E932F2697216 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:0B086DBA-DB8C-4253-AB9C-E932F2697216 |
treatment provided by |
Jeremy |
scientific name |
Panjange marilog Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Panjange marilog Huber View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:0B086DBA-DB8C-4253-AB9C-E932F2697216
Figs 14–15 View Figs 2 – 15 , 79–89 View Figs 79 – 83 View Figs 84 – 89
Diagnosis
Easily distinguished from most known relatives (except Pa. dinagat Huber sp. nov.) by complex male palpal trochanter apophysis ( Fig. 80 View Figs 79 – 83 ), and by widening of epigynal scape in mid-section ( Fig. 82 View Figs 79 – 83 ); from Pa. dinagat Huber sp. nov. by male pedipalp ( Figs 79–80 View Figs 79 – 83 ; relatively more slender tibia; longer whitish elongation of tarsus; different shapes of procursus and appendix; wider embolus) and female genitalia (wider than long; Fig. 82 View Figs 79 – 83 ).
Etymology
The species name is derived from the type locality; noun in apposition.
Type material
PHILIPPINES: holotype Ƌ, in ZFMK ( Ar 13018 ), Mindanao , Davao del Sur Province, Marilog Distr., Baganihan (7.469°N, 125.250°E), 1210 m a.s.l., primary forest near road , on leaves , 15 Feb. 2014 (B.A. Huber, E. Mondejar) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
PHILIPPINES: Davao del Sur Province: 4 ƋƋ, 1 ♀ in ZFMK ( Ar 13019 ) GoogleMaps and 1 Ƌ in MSU-IIT, same data as holotype GoogleMaps ; 2 ♀♀, 3 juvs in pure ethanol, in ZFMK ( Phi 255 ), same data GoogleMaps ; 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀ in ZFMK (Ar 13020), same locality, “ site 2 ” (7.4563°N, 125.2390°E), 6 Dec. 2014 (M.A. Responte) GoogleMaps ; 1 Ƌ, 2 ♀♀, 3 juvs in ZFMK ( Ar 13021 ) GoogleMaps and 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀ in MSU-IIT, same locality, “ site 3 ” (7.4696°N, 125.2452°E), 7 Dec. 2014 (M.A. Responte) GoogleMaps . Bukidnon Province: 2 ƋƋ, 4 ♀♀, 7 juvs in ZFMK ( Ar 13022 ) and 1 Ƌ, 1 ♀ in MSU-IIT, all poorly preserved, Imbayao (8.1344°N, 125.0297°E), 9–10 Feb. 2015 (E.P. Mondejar) GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 5.1, carapace width 1.2. Leg 1: 41.2 (9.6 + 0.5 + 9.7 + 19.1 + 2.3), tibia 2: 6.5, tibia 3: 3.8, tibia 4: 5.7; tibia 1 L/d: 97. Distance PME–PME 470 µm, diameter PME 90 µm, distance PME–ALE ~50 µm; AME absent.
COLOR. Carapace pale ochre yellow to whitish, without posterior mark, ocular area and clypeus dark brown, with black mark in AME area; sternum whitish; legs ochre-yellow with dark brown patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen ochre-gray, with black marks dorsally, monochromous ventrally.
BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 14 View Figs 2 – 15 ; ocular area raised, each triad on long stalk, with pointed curved process arising from near PME and directed toward anterior ( Figs 81 View Figs 79 – 83 , 84, 87 View Figs 84 – 89 ); carapace without median furrow; clypeus with two patches of modiFed hairs: slightly stronger hairs below black mark and distinct Feld of ~20 short spines more distally ( Figs 84–85 View Figs 84 – 89 ); sternum wider than long (0.70/0.60), unmodiFed.
CHELICERAE. As in Figs 81 View Figs 79 – 83 and 84 View Figs 84 – 89 , with pair of simple, weakly sclerotized processes in rather frontal position directed toward median; without modiFed hairs; without stridulatory ridges.
PALPS. As in Figs 79–80 View Figs 79 – 83 ; symmetric; coxa with strong ventro-distal rim but otherwise unmodiFed; trochanter relatively long, with simple retrolatero-dorsal process and complex retrolatero-ventral apophysis distally curved toward prolateral, with two distinctive subdistal branches directed toward distal and retrolateral respectively; femur short, with two short dorsal processes and indistinct prolateral hump; tibia very thick (tibia width ~60% of length); tarsus with whitish elongation with terminal capsulate tarsal organ ( Fig. 89 View Figs 84 – 89 ); procursus proximal part with ventral process, distal part hinged, with distinctive retrolateral process and simple Fat prolateral process; bulb with strong proximal sclerite, long processes extending in opposite directions (dorsal embolus; ventral appendix), with retrolateral process arising from proximal bulbal sclerite, with small round sclerite between appendix and bulb.
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 2%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with> 30 pseudosegments, only distally fairly distinct.
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in 10 other males: 9.2–10.4 (mean 9.6). Background color of abdomen with variable shades of reddish to light brown ( Figs 14–15 View Figs 2 – 15 ).
Female
In general similar to male but eye triads on low humps and much closer together (distance PME–PME 240 µm); clypeus unmodiFed. Tibia 1 in 4 females: 7.1, 7.3, 7.3, 7.5. Epigynum weakly sclerotized plate with scape directed toward anterior, scape strongly folded, apparently extensible, with distinctive widening in mid-section ( Fig. 82 View Figs 79 – 83 ), distal part semitransparent; internal genitalia as in Fig. 83 View Figs 79 – 83 .
Natural history
The spiders were found on the undersides of leaves about 0.5–1 m above the ground.
Distribution
Known from two localities on Mindanao Island ( Fig. 16 View Fig. 16 ).
ZFMK |
Germany, Bonn, Zoologische Forschungsinstitut und Museum "Alexander Koenig" |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.