Radicipes gracilis ( Verrill, 1884 )

Perez, Carlos D., 2017, A revision of the genus Radicipes Stearns, 1883 (Anthozoa: Octocorallia: Chrysogorgiidae), Zootaxa 4319 (1), pp. 1-26 : 14-17

Radicipes gracilis ( Verrill, 1884)

Figs. 2 E–F, 9, 10

Lepidogorgia gracilis Verrill, 1884: 220 ; 1885: 512, 533, pl. 2, fig. 10, 10a.—VerSluyS, 1902: 16.— ThomSon & HenderSon, 1906: 27 (tabular key).

Strophogorgia fragilis Wright & Studer, 1889: 4 , pl. 2, fig. 2, pl. 5a. fig. 4.

Lepidogorgia fragilis .—VerSluyS, 1902: 16-17.— ThomSon & HenderSon, 1906: 27.

Radicipes gracilis .— Kükenthal, 1919: 548; 24: 412.— Verrill, 1922: 42, fig 10, 10a.— Deichmann, 1936: 237.— MadSen, 1944: 46 –49, text-figS. 37–41.— Bayer, 1979: 882, fig. 2c.— Bayer & Macintyre, 2001: 342 (mineralogy).— Watling & AuSter, 2005: 28 (liSted).— McFadden et al., 2006: 525, figS. 1–3.— Wareham & Edinger, 2007: 295, 298, 302, fig. 1J.— CogSWell et al., 2009: fig. 10G.— Buhl-MortenSen et al., 2010: 43 (mentioned). — Pante & France, 2010: 597.— Watling et al., 2011: 59 (liSted).— Baker, et al., 2012: 239, 240, 244.— Pante & France, 2012: figS. 2–3, Supplemental table 1 (liSted).— Cordeiro et al., 2015: 94, 95 (tabular key).— Buhl-MortenSen et al., 2015: 39 –61, figS. 2f, 3i, 4, 5.

? Lepidogorgia challengeri . — JungerSen, 1915: 1184.

Radicipes fragilis .— Kükenthal, 1924: 143. — Tixier-Durivault & d’Hondt, 1975: 1410. —Braga-HenriqueS et al., 2013: 4026 (liSted).— Cordeiro et al., 2015: 95 (tabular key).

Lepidogorgia verrilli . — ThomSon, 1927: 20 –21, pl. 3, fig. 18, pl. 5, fig. 20.

Types and Type Localities. Radicipes gracilis : USNM 9118 (syntype), Alb- 2072, 41°53'N, 65°35'W (off Massachusetts), 1569 m; USNM 8877 , USNM 9350 , USNM 26030 , USNM 30283 , USNM 33570 , YPM 8768 and YPM 10045 (syntypes), Alb- 2037, 38°53'N, 69°23'30"W, 3166 m (off Massachusetts); part of the syntype series (from Alb -2036) is lost.

Strophogorgia fragilis : BM 1889.5.27.4 (holotype, one specimen), Chall- 70: 38°25’N, 35°50’W (west of Azores), 3063 m.

Material Examined. Del- 23, 39°55'55"N, 67°11'W, 1155 m (USNM 1111944, YPM 35442 and YPM 36838); Alb- 2569, 39°26'N, 68°03'30"W, 3259 (USNM 11913 and YPM 10049); Del- 29, 39°53'N, 67°23'W, 1395 (USNM 1110402); Alb -2209, 39°34'45"N, 71°31'30"W, 1975 m (USNM 8193 and YPM 10051); Alb -2570, 39°54'05"N, 67°05'30"W, 3316 m (USNM 11914); Alb -2575, 41°07'N, 65°26'30"W, 3128 m (USNM 11908); Alb -2563, 39°18'30"N, 71°23'30"W, 2601 m (USNM 11929 and YPM 10106); Del -14, 39°53'N, 67°26'24"W, depth unknown (USNM 100900); Del -47-Bear, 39°52'58"N, 67°25'58"W, 1195-1402 (USNM 1010390); Del-24, 39°52'12"N, 67°20'18.6"W, 1428–1650 m (YPM 36783); Pisces -16, 40°10'54"N, 67°26'40.2"W, 1961 m (YPM 72083).

Description. Colonies golden, stiff, tall, up to 90 cm in height, coiled in clockwise or counterclockwise manner; aXis 2.2 mm, maXimum diameter. Young colonies brittle and iridescent. Holdfast calcareous, profusely branched, usually thinner than aXis. Coenenchyme thin, fragile and easily detachable from aXis. At least one quarter of lower part of colony devoid of polyps. Distance between polyps about 1.5 mm in proXimal portions to 10.0 mm distally. Polyps 2.5–5.0 mm long, cylindrical to slightly trumpet-shaped ( Fig. 2 E–F), disposed in a single longitudinal line (polypar side), spaced 4.0–10.0 mm apart in a frequency of three to five per centimeter (usually three). Eight longitudinal rows of rods in the body wall of completely developed polyps, with adaXials usually less developed, 0.18–0.7 mm long and 0.02–0.06 mm wide. Longest rods of body wall aligned with abaXial side, but no large supporting rods in abaXial side. AbaXial line from the lower portion of polyp to distal portion with four to siX juXtaposed pairs of rods in alternate lines, relatively homogeneous in size. Sclerite size decreases from abaXial to outer lateral rows. Inner lateral and adaXial rows composed of loosely placed rods, sometimes naked. Oral portion with rods similar in size to those from lower portion of polyp. Infrabasal and adaXial portions filled with flattened rods, slightly 8-shaped, 0.15–0.26 mm long and 0.04–0.05 mm wide ( Figs. 9 A, 10A). Infrabasal and abaXial rods with slightly flattened tips becoming more rounded and sparse in oral portion. AbaXial row of rods eXtending through coenenchyme between polyps, connecting them. Coenenchymal sclerites rare or completely absent, when present, similar to those of infrabasal and adaXial portions. Tentacular rods 0.07–0.18 mm long and 0.01–0.04 mm wide, becoming flatter in proXimal-distal wall ( Figs. 9 B, 10C). Pinnules filled with small scales, 0.1–0.13 mm in length and 0.01–0.04 mm in width ( Figs. 9 C, 10B).

Comparisons. Colonies of R. gracilis differ from the Atlantic species R. challengeri and R. kopelatos by having larger polyps (Table 1) and by having their body wall densely filled with sclerites ( Fig. 2 ). Although the longest polyps in R. kopelatos reach up to 3.3 mm, most polyps in a colony are very short in comparison to those in R. gracilis , usually half their length. As well, the aXis diameter in R. gracilis is usually thicker. The Pacific species Radicipes stonei has a similar polyp shape, but differs in having one or two long supporting rods in the lower abaXial side, having irregular infrabasal flattened rods, and having body wall rods with at least one flat tip.

Remarks. Radicipes gracilis is the most frequently recorded species in the genus, with at least 12 records presented herein and several others gleaned from the literature ( Fig. 3 , Supplementary file). Most studies have treated mid-Atlantic ( R. fragilis ) and western Atlantic ( R. gracilis ) populations as separate species. Nonetheless, no revisions including eXaminations of both types have been carried out until now. The type remains of R. fragilis consist of just a fragment of tissue (no aXis) with several polyps. But this is enough to determine that the types are indistinguishable (compare Fig. 2 E,E’ with 2F and Fig. 9 with Fig. 10 ). Several misconceptions about the morphological features of R. gracilis can be seen in the available literature. Thomson & Henderson (1906), for eXample, implied that the species has more coenenchymal sclerites than R. pleurocristatus (see Thomson & Henderson, 1906: p. 27, comparative table of species of Lepidogorgia ). According to Madsen (1944) and Cordeiro et al. (2015), the main differences between the two species can be seen in the measurements of the polyps, twice as long in R. gracilis , and the longer body wall rods in R. fragilis ( Cordeiro et al., 2015) . We understand that the ‘polyp distinction’ is due to the measurements given by Madsen (1944), which included tentacles in the total polyp length determination, whereas no other author has included the tentacles to describe this character. Actually, both species have the same polypar length range, from 2.5 to 4.0 mm, not 5.0 to 10.0 mm as stated by Madsen. Rods from the body wall were slightly longer in the R. fragilis type (up to 0. 75 mm long, whereas usually just up to 0.5 mm in western Atlantic specimens). Even though we only eXamined one mid-Atlantic colony, we consider it to be the same species, considering the sclerite size to be more related to age of the colony and seXual maturation.

It remains to be seen if the sequenced mid-Atlantic specimen ‘VER2041’ ( Pante et al., 2012) fits our R. gracilis definition, or R. challengeri , or is a different species. Considering Pante’s phylogenies, in the first case, one could consider treating R. gracilis as a cryptic species compleX or one could suggest the reestablishment of R. fragilis as a valid name. Our eXaminations however do not allow us to keep both as valid.

Distribution. In western Atlantic from North Carolina to Canada; Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Seamounts and Portugal (Azores), from 500–3259 m.

Figures

FIGURE 2. PolypS of Radicipes Spp. A, B: polypS of Radicipes challengeri (Wright & Studer, 1889) (BMNH 1889.5.27.3, holotype, and USNM 57314, reSpectively); C: polyp of Radicipes stonei Sp. nov. (USNM 1418007, holotype); D: polyp of Radicipes kopelatos Cordeiro, Pérez & CaStro, 2015 (MNRJ 8566, holotype); E – F: polypS of Radicipes gracilis (Verrill, 1884) (BMNH 1889.5. 27.4, holotype, including detail of the oral portion (E’), of Radicipes fragilis (Wright & Studer, 1889) and, USNM 8877, Syntype of Radicipes gracilis (Verrill, 1884 )), reSpectively; G: polyp of Radicipes aureus Kükenthal, 1919 (ZMB 8565, holotype); H, H': polyp of Radicipes pleurocristatus StearnS, 1883 (BMNH 1889.5.27.2, holotype of Radicipes verrilli (Wright & Studer, 1889 )) and detail of the oral portion, reSpectively; I, I': polypS of Radicipes pleurocristatus StearnS, 1883 (USNM 49464), full-Sized polypS, normal and fertile, reSpectively. Scale barS: A, H': 0.2 mm; B: 0.6 mm; C: 0.5 mm; D, E, G, H, I’: 1 mm; D', E’, F: 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 3. DiStributional range of Radicipes recordS baSed on localitieS of the SpecimenS herein examined (orange circleS) aS Well aS geo-referenced data compiled from literature (WilliamS, 1992; MortenSen et al., 2007; Altuna, 2010; Watling et al., 2011; Rueda et al., 2012; AlderSlade et al., 2014; Gonzalez-MireliS & Buhl-MortenSen, 2015) and the Ocean Biogeographic Information SyStem—OBIS (yelloW circleS).

FIGURE 9. ScleriteS of Radicipes gracilis (Verrill, 1884) (USNM 8877, Syntype). A: rodS from polyp body Wall; B: flattened tentacular rodS; C: pinnular ScaleS. Scale barS: A, B: 0.1 mm; C: 0.05 mm.

FIGURE 10. ScleriteS of Radicipes gracilis (Verrill, 1884) (BMNH 1889.5.27.4, holotype of R. fragilis (Wright & Studer, 1889 )). A: rodS from body Wall; B: pinnular ScaleS; C: tentacular rodS. Scale barS: A, C: 0.1 mm; B: 0.05 mm.