Equus hemionus Pallas 1775
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.7316519 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11330561 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8D187E38-317C-C3FB-85D4-CD1615E66ECD |
treatment provided by |
Guido |
scientific name |
Equus hemionus Pallas 1775 |
status |
|
Equus hemionus Pallas 1775 View in CoL
Equus hemionus Pallas 1775 View in CoL , Nova Comm. Imp. Acad. Sci. Petropoli, 19: 394.
Type Locality: "ad Lacum Tarei Dauuriae", i.e. Russia, Transbaikalia, S Chitinsk. Obl., Tarei-Nor, 50°N, 115°E. GoogleMaps
Vernacular Names: Onager.
Subspecies: :
Subspecies Equus hemionus subsp. hemionus Pallas 1775
Subspecies Equus hemionus subsp. blanfordi Pocock 1947
Subspecies Equus hemionus subsp. hemippus I. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire 1855
Subspecies Equus hemionus subsp. khur Lesson 1827
Subspecies Equus hemionus subsp. kulan Groves and Mazák 1967
Subspecies Equus hemionus subsp. luteus Matschie 1911
Subspecies Equus hemionus subsp. onager Boddaert 1785
Distribution: Formerly much of Mongolia, north to Transbaikalia ( Russia); east to NE Inner Mongolia ( China) and possibly W Manchuria ( China); and west to Dzhungarian Gate. Survives in SW and SC Mongolia and adjacent China; see Sokolov and Orlov (1980:248). Also formerly Kazakhstan north to upper Irtysh and Ural Rivers ( Russia); westward north of the Caucasus and Black Sea at least to Dniestr River ( Ukraine); Anatolia, Syria, and SE of Caspian Sea in N Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, and Pakistan to Thar Desert of NW India; survives as isolated populations in Rann of Kutch ( India), Badkhys Preserve, Turkmenistan, and C Iran; also reestablished on Barsa-Khelmes Isl (Aral Sea, Uzbekistan); until 17th-18th centuries in Armenia and Azerbaidjan.
Conservation: CITES – Appendix I as E. h. hemionus , E. onager and E. onager khur ; otherwise Appendix II; U.S. ESA – Endangered; IUCN – Extinct E. h. hemippus, Critically Endangered as E. h. onager and E. h. kulan, Endangered as E. h. khur, Vulnerable as E. hemionus , E. h. hemionus and E. h. luteus.
Discussion: Revised by Groves and Mazák (1967), Groves (1986), and Schlawe (1986), who included onager in hemionus . Bennett (1980) considered onager (including hemippus , khur , and kulan) to be a distinct species. Nominate subspecies is also known by common name Kulan or Dzigetai; luteus doubtfully separable from it. Groves (2003) considered khur as a species separate from E. hemionus .
ESA |
Universidade de São Paulo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.