Chinoperla sila, Sivec & Stark, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4759667 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4759535 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8D0787D3-FFC3-FFAC-FEF8-FE61FEAE6044 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Chinoperla sila |
status |
sp. nov. |
Chinoperla sila View in CoL sp. n.
( Figs. 19-25 View Figs View Figs )
Material examined. Holotype ♂, 15♂ and 6♀ paratypes from Tam Dao , Vietnam, 800-1100 m, 19 May-13 June 1995, H. Malicky ( PMSL).
Adult habitus. Biocellate. Head with dark brown pigment over most of dorsum but interrupted by pale M-line and clypeus. Pronotum pale brown with darker rugosities clustered near midline and center of disk. Wings tinted brown except for narrow pale costal and apical band. Legs banded with narrow brown band on apex of femur and base of tibiae.
Male. Forewing length 9 mm. Median process of tergum 9 more or less circular and distinctly rugose. Finger like hemitergal processes short, ca. twice as long as basal width ( Fig. 22 View Figs ). Aedeagal tube poorly sclerotized and bearing a pair of sparse setal patches basolaterally ( Figs. 23-24 View Figs ); sac with a dorsal and smaller ventral membranous lobe and bearing a long slender terminal spine; basoventral margin of sac armed with sparse patch of small spines.
Female. Forewing length 10 mm. Subgenital plate unproduced but posterior margin of sternum 8 bearing a shallow, median U-shaped notch ( Fig. 25 View Figs ). Egg. Length ca. 0.39 mm, width ca. 0.22 mm. Tear drop shaped with short narrow collar and stalked anchor ( Fig. 19 View Figs ). Chorionic surface finely punctate throughout; collar surface and adjacent egg body with an irregular pattern of meshwork formed by anastamosing low ridges ( Fig. 20 View Figs ). Micropylar orifices slender, surrounded by small area of smooth chorion ( Fig. 21 View Figs ).
Larva. Unknown.
Etymology. The species name, used as a noun in apposition, honors the Si La people of northern Vietnam.
Diagnosis. This is another species whose aedeagus is similar to that of C. unidentata in having a single, long, slender apical spine ( Fig. 23 View Figs ). It can be distinguished from C. gorohovi and C. unidentata by the somewhat circular and rugose process of tergum 9 ( Fig. 22 View Figs ), and by the narrow pale margin of the wing tips.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |