Pyrrhalta jungchani, Lee & Bezděk, 2021

Lee, Chi-Feng & Bezdek, Jan, 2021, Revision of the genera Xanthogaleruca Laboissiere, 1932 and Pyrrhalta Joannis, 1865 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae) of Taiwan, with type designation of Galerucella lineatipes Takei, ZooKeys 1039, pp. 1-108 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1039.64740

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3487C357-0FAC-4907-A5C0-C0A0C801C6E3

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4C599464-5532-40EB-B379-B4C92C03ABE2

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:4C599464-5532-40EB-B379-B4C92C03ABE2

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Pyrrhalta jungchani
status

sp. nov.

Pyrrhalta jungchani sp. nov. Figs 38A-C View Figure 38 , 39 View Figure 39 , 40A View Figure 40

Types.

Holotype ♂ (TARI), Taiwan. Pingtung, Tahantrail (大漢林道), 30.VII.2012, leg. J.-C. Chen. Paratypes. Chiayi: 1♀ (TARI), Zengwen Reservoir (曾文水庫), 2.IV.2016, leg. U. Ong; Nantou: 2♀ (NMNS), Juiyenhsi (瑞岩溪), Shuikuan Road (水管路), 19.II.2009, Beating,leg. M. L. Chan; 1♂ (NMNS), same locality, 19-21.II.2009, UV light trap, leg. H. H. Lian & C. D. Tang; 1♀ (TARI), Tsuifeng (翠峰), 23.V.1982, leg. L. Y. Chou; 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 20.IV.1983, leg. K. C. Chou & S. P. Huang; 1♀ (TARI), same as holotype but with “22.XI.2010”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “13.IX.2012”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “16.X.2013”; Pingtung: 1♀ (TARI), Lilungshan (里龍山), 5.XI.2009, leg. M.-H. Tsou; 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 28.XI.2009, leg. J.-C. Chen; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “8.I.2010”; 1♂, 1♀ (TARI), same but with “2.III.2012”; 3♀ (TARI), same but with “13.III.2012”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “27.III.2012”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “8.I.2013”; 2♂, 4♀ (TARI), Shuangliu (雙流), 14.III.2018, leg. Y.-T. Chung; 2♂, 2♀ (TARI), Tahanshan (大漢山), 18.IV.2018, leg. C.-F. Lee; 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 3.III.2020, leg. Y.-T. Chung; Taitung: 1♀ (TARI), Hsiangyang (向陽), 23.VI.2010, leg. M.-H. Tsou; 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 8.VII.2010, leg. J.-C. Chen; 1♂ (TARI), same but with “12.VII.2012”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “9.V.2013”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “17.V.2014”; 1♀ (TARI), Motien (摩天), 23.VI.2010, leg. M.-H. Tsou.

Diagnosis.

Small species, 4.3-5.0 mm in length. Pronotum with three large black spots, one at middle, two laterally. Elytra relatively narrow, 1.7 × longer than wide, disc with dense coarse punctures, with black stripes at humeral calli, with one additional pair of longitudinal dark stripes between humeral calli and suture.

Description.

Length 4.3-5.0 mm, width 1.9-2.3 mm. Body yellowish brown (Fig. 38A-C View Figure 38 ); vertex with median longitudinal dark stripe, expanding laterally at base; antennae dark brown, but five or six basal antennomeres paler; pronotum with one pair of large dark spots at lateral depressions, with three small dark spots medially, one pair at apical 1/3, the other at basal 1/3; elytra with three pairs of longitudinal dark stripes, first pair arising from humeral calli, abbreviated at apical 1/3, second pair halfway between first pair and suture, present from base to apical 1/3; third pair along suture, from apical 1/3 to base; those dark spots or stripes more or less reduced in different individuals; lateral margins of femora and tibiae dark brown. Eyes small, interocular space 2.34-2.68 × diameter of eye. Antennae filiform in males (Fig. 39A View Figure 39 ), length ratios of antennomeres I-XI 1.0: 0.5: 0.6: 0.5: 0.5: 0.5: 0.5: 0.5: 0.6: 0.6: 0.8, length to width ratios of antennomeres I-XI 2.9: 2.1: 2.2: 1.9: 1.9: 1.9: 1.9: 2.0: 2.0: 2.1: 2.7; similar in females (Fig. 39B View Figure 39 ), length ratios of antennomeres I-XI 1.0: 0.5: 0.6: 0.5: 0.5: 0.5: 0.5: 0.6: 0.5: 0.6: 0.8, length to width ratios of antennomeres I-XI 3.3: 2.2: 2.7: 2.3: 2.2: 2.1: 2.1: 2.4: 2.3: 2.4: 3.3. Pronotum and elytra convex. Pronotum 2.0-2.1 × wider than long, with transverse ridge along apical margin deflexed at antero-lateral angles; disc with reticulate microsculpture, and extremely coarse, dense punctures, with one extremely short seta at each puncture; with median longitudinal and lateral depressions; lateral margins moderately rounded, widest at middle, apical and basal margins slightly concave; anterior and posterior setiferous punctures not erect. Elytra broad, parallel-sided, 1.7 × longer than wide; disc smooth, with extremely coarse and dense punctures, and sparse, extremely short pubescence, usually located between punctures; with indistinct ridges along dark stripes. Apical spur of tibia of middle leg small (Fig. 39F View Figure 39 ), and tarsomere I modified, axe-shaped in lateral view, narrow basally, and extending to apical 2/3, angles of extended part narrowly rounded in males (Fig. 39H View Figure 39 ). Aedeagus (Fig. 39C, D View Figure 39 ) slender in dorsal view, 5.3 × longer than wide, asymmetrically lanceolate, slightly curved at middle, strongly narrowed and recurved near apex, apex narrowly rounded; ostium obliquely longitudinal, covered by a membrane; strongly curved near base in lateral view, recurved near apex, apex narrowly rounded; two endophallic sclerites elongate, primary sclerite 0.8 × as long as aedeagus, with dense teeth along apical margin. Secondar sclerite much shorter, 0.3 × as long as secondary sclerite, apex acute. Only apices of gonocoxae (Fig. 39G View Figure 39 ) sclerotized, longitudinal, few short setae near base, with six to seven long setae near apex of each gonocoxa. Ventrite VIII (Fig. 39E View Figure 39 ) well sclerotized, with dense, short setae along lateral and apical area, short and long marginal setae, spiculum long. Receptacle of spermatheca (Fig. 39K View Figure 39 ) slightly swollen and elongate; pump short and strongly curved; sclerotized proximal spermathecal duct narrow and short. Apical margin of abdominal ventrite V slightly concave medially and with deep depression in males (Fig. 39J View Figure 39 ); while broadly rounded in females (Fig. 39I View Figure 39 ).

Remarks.

Adults of P. jungchani sp. nov. (Fig. 38A View Figure 38 ), X. aenescens (Fairmaire) (Fig. 1D View Figure 1 ), and P. lineatipes (Takei) (Fig. 45G View Figure 45 ) are easily recognized by the three black spots on the pronota. This new species (Fig. 38C View Figure 38 ) is most similar to P. lineatipes (Fig. 45I View Figure 45 ) based on the brown elytra with a black stripe arising from the humeral calli and convex pronotum and elytra (entirely metallic green elytra and dorso-ventrally flattened pronotum and elytra in X. aenescens (Fig. 1F View Figure 1 )). The new species is different from P. lineatipes in possessing sparse pubescence and extremely dense elytral punctures (dense pubescence with sparse elytral punctures in P. lineatipes ), and modified tarsomere I of middle leg in males (Fig. 39H View Figure 39 ) (normal tarsomere I of middle leg in males of P. humeralis ). In males of this new species, the aedeagus (Fig. 39C, D View Figure 39 ) is similar to that of P. lui sp. nov. (Fig. 40C, D View Figure 40 ) with the asymmetrically lanceolate shape and two endophallic sclerites but differs in the recurved apex and shorter secondary endophallic sclerite, 0.3 × as long as primary endophallic sclerite (the straight apex and the longer second endophallic, 0.6 × as long as primary endophallic sclerite, in P. lui sp. nov.).

Food plant.

adults feed on leaves of Viburnum odoratissimum Ker Gawl. ( Adoxaceae ) (Fig. 40A View Figure 40 ).

Distribution.

The species is widespread at mid-altitudes (1,500-2,500 m) in central and southern Taiwan.

Etymology.

Dedicated to Mr Jung-Chan Chen who was the first member of TCRT to collect specimens of this new species.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Chrysomelidae

Genus

Pyrrhalta