Priscula espejoi Huber, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.909.2351 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A48BD2B3-DC40-45BD-9968-F04890A1C5C5 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10249901 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BF9F8559-152A-4541-8096-56EFDBBEB85C |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:BF9F8559-152A-4541-8096-56EFDBBEB85C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Priscula espejoi Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Priscula espejoi Huber sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:BF9F8559-152A-4541-8096-56EFDBBEB85C
Figs 5G–H View Fig , 16–20 View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig View Fig
Diagnosis
Distinguished from known congeners by details of procursus ( Fig. 17A–C View Fig ; distal ventral sclerite long and slender in lateral view, with distinctive bifid tip in dorsal view; distinctive dorsal membrane smaller than in similar P. azuay sp. nov.; without retrolateral process), genital bulb ( Fig. 17D–F View Fig ; main bulbal process with obtuse tip, similar to P. llaviucu , smaller than in P. azuay ), male chelicerae ( Fig. 18A–B View Fig ; frontal apophyses in very distal position, longer than in most known congeners), epigynum ( Fig. 19A–B View Fig ; in lateral view with anterior bulge), and female internal genitalia ( Fig. 18C View Fig ; pore plates roughly triangular, narrower anteriorly than posteriorly and converging anteriorly – apparently indistinguishable from P. azuay ).
Etymology
The species is named for Francisco Javier Eugenio de Santa Cruz y Espejo (1747–1795), a scientist and writer of mestizo origin in colonial Ecuador.
Type material
Holotype ECUADOR – Azuay • ♂; between Guayaquil and Cuenca , ‘loc. 1’; 2.664° S, 79.445° W; 1100 m a.s.l.; 21 Sep. 2021; B.A. Huber and M. Herrera leg.; in tunnel under road; MECN–ARAC–28–T . GoogleMaps
Paratype ECUADOR – Azuay • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype but in forest at roadside; MECN– ARAC–29–T , in ZFMK Ar 24096 GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
ECUADOR – Azuay • 2 ♀♀, 3 juvs, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for paratype; ZFMK Ecu151 GoogleMaps • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; between Guayaquil and Cuenca , ‘loc. 2’; 2.706° S, 79.435° W; 2400 m a.s.l.; 21 Sep. 2021; B.A. Huber and M. Herrera leg.; ravine with forest remnant near road; MECN–ARAC–30–T , in ZFMK Ar 24097 GoogleMaps • 3 ♀♀, in pure ethanol; same collection data as for preceding; ZFMK Ecu154 GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 4.8, carapace width 2.25. Distance PME–PME 230 µm; diameter PME 220 µm; distance PME–ALE 130 µm; distance AME–AME 35 µm; diameter AME 65 µm. ALE and PLE larger than PME (diameters 270 µm). Leg 1: 41.2 (10.8+0.9 +10.9 +16.5 +2.1), tibia 2: 7.5, tibia 3: 4.9, tibia 4: 6.9; tibia 1 L/d: 52.
COLOR (in ethanol). Carapace pale ochre-yellow, with brown median mark and lateral bands, ocular area and clypeus also dark brown; sternum brown with some lighter marks; legs ochre-yellow, with dark rings subdistally on femora and proximally and subdistally on tibiae; abdomen gray, dorsally and laterally densely covered with black marks and small white marks in-between, ventrally with distinct brown plate in front of gonopore and ochre mark between gonopore and pedicel.
BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 5G View Fig . Ocular area raised, without hump on posterior side, with stronger hairs at median side of each ocular triad. Deep thoracic groove. Clypeus unmodified except sclerotized rim. Sternum wider than long (1.35/1.00), unmodified.Abdomen higher than long, dorso-posteriorly rounded.
CHELICERAE. As in Fig. 18A–B View Fig , with short entapophyses, pair of frontal apophyses in very distal position and in lateral view pointing towards distal, without stridulatory ridges.
PALPS. As in Fig. 16A–C View Fig ; coxa unmodified, trochanter with low whitish rounded ventral protrusion, femur large, proximally with distinct retrolateral process, ventrally with low rounded process at half-length followed by whitish round area, distal ventral rim protruding, in ventral view with wide excavation; patella ventrally reduced to strongly sclerotized narrow rim; tibia small relative to femur; procursus ( Fig. 17A–C View Fig ) distally with dorsal transversal membranous element and distinctive ventral sclerite; genital bulb ( Fig. 17D–F View Fig ) with small process on proximal sclerite, with whitish area on retrolateral-ventral side (collapsed in holotype), slightly spiraling main bulbal process.
LEGS. Without spines; with curved hairs on metatarsi 1–3, some weakly curved hairs also on tibiae 1–2; with few short vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 6%; prolateral trichobothrium present on all leg tibiae; tarsi without regular pseudosegmentation but rather with many indistinct platelets.
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in second male: 9.3.
Female
In general similar to male ( Fig. 5H View Fig ), but clypeus rim not sclerotized, hairs between eye triads shorter. Tibia 1 in seven females: 7.4–8.1 (mean 7.7). Epigynum ( Figs 19A–B View Fig , 20A–B View Fig ) main anterior plate trapezoidal, in lateral view anteriorly protruding and angular. Internal genitalia ( Figs 18C View Fig , 19C–D View Fig , 20C– F View Fig ) with pair of triangular pore plates at slightly variable distances, converging anteriorly.
Distribution
Known from two neighboring localities in Azuay Province, Ecuador ( Fig. 4A View Fig ). The two localities are close together (<5 km straight line) but at very different altitudes (1100 and 2400 m a.s.l.).
Natural history
Most specimens were found deep in sheltered spaces in the ground; the male at the type locality was collected in a tunnel under the road. One egg-sac had a diameter of 4.5 mm, and contained ~ 40 eggs with a diameter of 1.20 mm.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.