Protosticta khaosoidaoensis Asahina, 1984

Phan, Quoc Toan & Kompier, Tom, 2016, A study of the genus Protosticta Selys, 1855, with descriptions of four new species from Vietnam (Odonata: Platystictidae), Zootaxa 4098 (3), pp. 529-544 : 542-543

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4098.3.6

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A005DB6C-7389-4506-B2D5-392531F832EB

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6056391

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8A1EB74F-8972-FF99-C7F3-60AFFE95903B

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Protosticta khaosoidaoensis Asahina, 1984
status

 

Notes on the status of Protosticta khaosoidaoensis Asahina, 1984 View in CoL

( Figure 10 View FIGURE 10 A–E)

Protosticta khaosoidaoensis: Asahina (1984) View in CoL , pp. 588–590, Figs. 8 View FIGURE 8 –15. Type locality: Khao Soi Dao mountains, Thailand.— Hämäläinen & Pinratana (1999), p. 60 (Chiang Mai, Chantaburi).—van Tol (2008), pp. 220–221, Figs. 5–10 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 . Makbun et al. (2011), p. 63 (Chiang Mai).— Yokoi & Souphanthong (2014), p. 26, Pl. 3, Fig. 14.

Protosticta khaosoidaoensis khaosoidaoensis: Kitagawa & Katatani (2002) View in CoL , pp. 33–34, Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 (Pong Nam Ron, Khao Soi Dao).

The material identified in van Tol (2008) as this species, but no longer considered to belong to it: 2 males, Huong Son district, Ha Tinh Province, 2.VII.1990; 1 male, Ky Son district, Nghe An Province, 8.VII.1990; 2 males, Thanh Chuong district, Nghe An Province, 11-12.VII.1990; 1 male, Doi Suthep, Chiang Mai, Thailand (JvT 19422).

Specimens examined. 1 male, Krating waterfall, Chantaburi Province, Thailand, 10.VII.2011; 2 females, Krating waterfall, Chantaburi Province, Thailand, 03.IV.2015, Noppadon Makbun leg.

Notes. Van Tol (2008) recorded P. khaosoidaoensis from Huong Son district, Ha Tinh Province of central Vietnam based on a comparison with a male of P. khaosoidaoensis from Doi Suthep in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Although he recognized that the Vietnamese specimen resembled P. c ur i o s a, he identified it as P. khaosoidaoensis based on the similarity of the color pattern of the prothorax to the original description ( Asahina 1984). To ascertain the status of P. khaosoidaoensis in Vietnam, we examined the types and other specimens of this species from its type locality (Chantaburi, Thailand) and compared these with the Vietnamese and Thai P. khaosoidaoensis illustrated by van Tol (2008: p. 221, Figs. 5–10 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 ).

Surprisingly, the male " P. khaosoidaoensis " from Doi Suthep illustrated by van Tol (2008: p. 221, Figs. 5–7 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 ) is different from P. khaosoidaoensis in several characters: (1) in P. khaosoidaoensis , the paraprocts have elongated tips, extending as far as the cerci ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 B and Fig. 13, p. 589, Asahina 1984), but are very short in van Tol's specimen (2008: p. 221, Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ); (2) in P. khaosoidaoensis the paraprocts have at their dorsal apex a large cup-like structure with a small spine ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 B) that is absent in van Tol's male (van Tol 2008: p. 221, Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ). Therefore, it appears that the male P. khaosoidaoensis from Doi Suthep illustrated by van Tol (2008) does not represent true P. khaosoidaoensis .

Van Tol (2008) also questioned whether P. c u r i o s a and P. khaosoidaoensis are truly distinct species, as structural differences seemed to be small. In fact there are some clear differences. Whereas P. khaosoidaoensis has a large cup-like structure with a large spine on its distal margin at the dorsal apex of the paraprocts ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 B), P. curiosa has only a very small cup-like structure lacking a spine ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 N). The female of P. c ur i os a differs from the female of P. khaosoidaoensis by a large oval yellow spot on the dorsum of S9 ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 Q), whereas this segment is generally, but not always, entirely black in P. khaosoidaoensis ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 E).

The Vietnamese material identified by van Tol (2008) as " P. khaosoidaoensis " is clearly much closer to P. curiosa than to P. khaosoidaoensis . Therefore we reject his specimen as P. khaosoidaoensis and cannot support the occurrence of that species in Vietnam. In fact his material matches our description of P. pseudocuriosa spec. nov.

from the same locality, especially by having the same two small oval yellow spots at the posterior end of the mesepisternum and mesepimeron (van Tol 2008: p. 221, Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). This character is absent in P. khaosoidaoensis ( Figs. 10 View FIGURE 10 A, 10D) and P. c u r i o s a ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 P).

Distribution. Thailand (Chantaburi and Chiang Mai Provinces), Lao PDR (Louang Phabang, Oudomxay Province).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Odonata

Family

Platystictidae

Genus

Protosticta

Loc

Protosticta khaosoidaoensis Asahina, 1984

Phan, Quoc Toan & Kompier, Tom 2016
2016
Loc

Protosticta khaosoidaoensis khaosoidaoensis:

Kitagawa & Katatani 2002
2002
Loc

Protosticta khaosoidaoensis:

Asahina 1984
1984
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF