Dilasia similis, Carpintero, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3871.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:373BF217-8734-47A1-AF27-C16DFE48D1C9 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5121972 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/894D87D0-861A-FFBD-FF1C-F8F3FD15F845 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dilasia similis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Dilasia similis n. sp.
( Fig. 139 View FIGURES 137–143 )
Diagnosis: Characterized by the typical structure of pygophore and left paramere (see Discussion).
Description: Measurements, see Table IV. Male: Dorsal view: General coloration dark brown with extreme base of corion, small spot on inner margin of cuneal fracture, labium and legs paler. One specimen with pronotum and abdomen also pale. Dorsal setae medium-sized. Setae longer on pronotum and exocorion. Head: Smooth, prolonged anteriorly from base of antennae; eyes small, interocular space wide ( Fig. 149 View FIGURES 149–158 ); antennal segment II slightly thicker towards the apex and longer than head. Antennal segments (I:II:III:IV) 1: 3.1: 2.4: -. Thorax: Pronotum small, with lateral margins straight; their anterior margins rounded; posterior margin slightly concave; anterior lobe smooth, posterior lobe strongly rugose ( Fig. 150 View FIGURES 149–158 ). Mesosternum and metasternum not sulcate medially; the latter prolonged posteriorly ( Fig. 155 View FIGURES 149–158 ). Foretibiae armed with spines ( Fig. 151 View FIGURES 149–158 ); pads medium-sized ( Fig. 152 View FIGURES 149–158 ); forefemora unarmed; foretrochanters with short and thick spines ( Fig. 153 View FIGURES 149–158 ). Hemelytra smooth ( Fig. 154 View FIGURES 149–158 ). Abdomen: Hairs on dorsal surface short and restricted to outer margins; copulatory spines short and thick ( Fig. 156 View FIGURES 149–158 ). Genitalia: Prominence on pygophore beneath the paramere ( Fig. 157 View FIGURES 149–158 ). Aedeagus armed with two lateral and subapical feather-like structures. Left paramere long, straight, slightly widened subapically and apically rounded ( Fig. 158 View FIGURES 149–158 ). Female: Similar to male in coloration and dimensions. Antennal segments (I:II:III:IV) 1: 2.8: 2.7: 2.5.
Distribution: Peru. ( Fig. 144 View FIGURE 144 ).
Material examined: Holotype: PERU: ♀ Cusco, Pagoreni (at light), VII-2004, J. Williams, 72º54’07’’W – 11º42’22’’S. MACN; ♀ same data II-2004. MACN; ♂ same data (slide-mounted). MACN; GoogleMaps ♂ Cusco, Nuevo Mundo, Base Pluspetrol, VII-2004, Williams, (at light), 78º08’30’’W – 11º33’02’’S. MACN; GoogleMaps ♂ Ucayali, Kirigueti (at light), VII-2004, J. Williams, 73º07’08’’W – 11º38’13’’S. MACN. GoogleMaps
Etymology: The specific name is given by having the external aspect similar to the new species crassicornis and gracilicornis .
Discussion: This species is similar to D. crassicornis and D. gracilicornis , but differs by having the left paramere straight, with outer margin straight to slightly concave, and apically not acute, as well as a longer prominence on pygophore beneath the paramere.
MACN |
Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales Bernardino Rivadavia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |